Talk:Battle of Mărășești

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.

Additional information:
/
	This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

Ecaterina Teodoroiu death date does not match here and in her aricle. mikka (t) 23:49, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know. See this. I'm not sure which is which. --Candide, or Optimism 01:55, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ro victory

The battle was a Ro victory. The Germans retreated after suffering huge loses. Sure, Ro could not regain the occupied territory and would soon sign a peace treaty, but the battle itself was a Ro victory. The aftermath is a different chapter. If you wish, you can expand the aftermath section. --Candide, or Optimism 13:07, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidness

Dear candid Anittas, before insulting people (see also Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:Etiquette if you haven't read them yet), did you care to check at least what have I added to this article [1]? It's not that complicated, you know. I added a paragraph about the Mărăşti battle and one about the aftermath of the battle. Was it that wrong? Anyone (who can actually read) can see the only words I replaced were:"near the fortress at Focsani" by adding more details about the Mărăşti offensive. Yours sincerely (or candidly, if you prefer), Mentatus 15:03, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I got a penny every time someone gave me a link to Wiki Civility, I would be able to buy Gate's house. There was nothing wrong with what you added, but with what you removed. You removed info about casualties on both sides and the aftermath. That was insane, so I just reverted. Do not remove valid info. --Candide, or Optimism 15:31, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you should use that money for a reading course (good manners can't be bought anyway). I haven't removed the casualties on both sides and the aftermath, as any sane person can see: [2] Mentatus 15:37, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]