Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 May 26

< May 25	May 27 >

May 26, 2006

Template:Mangalist

Resurrected and renamed template that was deleted last year. The reason I give for re-delete comes from the original deletion proposal and a subsequent comment: Category scheme in a box. Very pretty, but it doesn't even have any content specifically related to any given article that it's put on. It does not follow the policy for navigational templates because it is more like a combination of TOC templates for the following: List of manga, Mangaka, and Manga. Secondly, the links for List of manga and List of Manga-ka are in alphabetical order, thus making it redundant to categories. --Kunzite 23:15, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User tlh

lo'wI'vam Sung Hol 'oH tlhIngan Hol’e'. (meaning This user is a native speaker of Klingon.) is a bad joke. I am proposing it's deletion and BJAODNing. Computerjoe 's talk 19:33, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Used, harmless, and we do actually have Klingon speakers (there was even a Klingon Wikipedia a while back, but it was locked). --Rory096 20:16, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Rory, I speak Klingon. But you can't speak Klingon natively, surely! Computerjoe's talk 20:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oh right, good point... In that case, subst and delete. --Rory096 20:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, sigh. --Cyde↔Weys 20:27, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Anonymous_anonymous_Have a Nice Day 20:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; subst if deleted. Unlike much of Wikipedia, this is entirely harmless. Septentrionalis 20:56, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep perfectly valid if odd babel box. Klingon is an officially recognized language in several countries. JohnnyBGood t c 22:42, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pol (keep) - jIH rur 'oH vaj pol 'oH --Disavian 22:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nom. Hope folks are raising Klingon speakers. -MrFizyx 23:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as one cannot be a native speaker of Klingon. But keep other Klingon templates (like we have for the other languages). Sophy's Duckling 23:26, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User iamafish-en

Keep deleted, orphaned, non-encyclopedic template. This isn't Uncyclopedia ... "humor value" isn't a valid criterion for a second DRV. --Cyde↔Weys 17:19, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete as very silly template. Please don't waste our time by undeleting crap templates and bringing them here. --Tony Sidaway 17:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete per Tony. (Did I really say that?) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 17:31, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Speedy Keep per the Tfd rulings of last week. --D -Day ^{on WHEELS!!!} 18:33, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In fairness last week would have only been a no consensus keep. It is right to debate these again. Sorry that some of the above folks feel that process is wasting their time. Hmmm... how did this all get started? -MrFizyx 23:42, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, subst if deleted. Harmless; the only effect this has on Wikipedia is to allow one bunch of users to pointlessly annoy another. Septentrionalis 20:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep It amuses me. Sophy's Duckling 23:26, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep until more convincing reason than "I don't think its funny," is found. I'm not buying, "UBX's are evil", "Template space is sacred," "This will only allow the fish to rise up against us all." I have taken the transclusion issue seriously enough to subst my own boxes, but I need more evidence. -MrFizyx 23:42, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User iamalemming-en

Keep deleted, orphaned, non-encyclopedic template. This isn't Uncyclopedia ... "humor value" isn't a valid criterion for a second DRV. --Cyde↔Weys 17:19, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete as very silly template. Please don't waste our time by undeleting crap templates and bringing them here. --Tony Sidaway 17:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete per Tony. (Did I really say that?) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 17:31, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Speedy Keep per the Tfd rulings of last week. --D -Day ^{on WHEELS!!!} 18:33, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In fairness last week would have been a no consensus keep -MrFizyx 23:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep; subst if deleted. Those who think this silly don't have to use it. Septentrionalis 20:59, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Pmanderson Sophy's Duckling 23:31, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep until more convincing reason than "I don't think its funny," is found. I'm not buying, "UBX's are evil", "Template space is sacred," "This will only allow the lemmings to rise up against us all." I have taken the transclusion issue seriously enough to subst my own boxes, but I need more evidence. -MrFizyx 23:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User iamamonarch-en

Keep deleted, orphaned, non-encyclopedic template. This isn't Uncyclopedia ... "humor value" isn't a valid criterion for a second DRV. --Cyde↔Weys 17:19, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete as very silly template. Please don't waste our time by undeleting crap templates and bringing them here. --Tony Sidaway 17:24, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete per Tony. (Did I really say that?) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 17:31, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Speedy Keep per the Tfd rulings of last week. --D -Day ^{on WHEELS!!!} 18:33, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Silliness is harmless, as long as it is kept out of articles. Septentrionalis 21:00, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy strong keep Harmless. Sophy's Duckling 23:27, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep until more convincing reason than "I don't think its funny," is found. I'm not buying, "UBX's are evil", "Template space is sacred," "This will only allow the evil monarchs to organize." I have taken the transclusion issue seriously enough to subst my own boxes, but I need more evidence. -MrFizyx 23:55, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User iamanaeroplane-en

Keep deleted, orphaned, non-encyclopedic template. This isn't Uncyclopedia ... "humor value" isn't a valid criterion for a second DRV. --Cyde↔Weys 17:18, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete as very silly template. Please don't waste our time by undeleting crap templates and bringing them here. --Tony Sidaway 17:22, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete per Tony. (Did I really say that?) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 17:31, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Speedy Keep per the Tfd rulings of last week. --D -Day ^{on WHEELS!!!} 18:33, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Harmless, and campaign to delete it pointless. Septentrionalis 21:01, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Pmanderson. Sophy's Duckling 23:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep until more convincing reason than "I don't think its funny," is found. I'm not buying, "UBX's are evil", "Template space is sacred," "This may cause an aeroplane uprising." I have taken the transclusion issue seriously enough to subst my own boxes, but I need more evidence. -MrFizyx 23:56, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PDFlink

What is the point in this? What makes a link to a PDF file so special that it needs to be distinguished from any other links? I don't think it makes sense to have this. — Timwi 14:31, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, there is something special about PDF files, many peoples internet browers don't display them but rather they get downloaded. The template needs fixing though as currently it seems to cause a line breck.--JK the unwise 15:03, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, useful as per JK the unwise. I think I fixed the linebreak issue. Kusma (討論) 15:43, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - usefull Agathoclea 21:32, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per JK -MrFizyx 23:52, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User Singularitarian

Template:User Singularitarian (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Granted, I realize this is a userbox, and blahblahblahkeep/deletealluserboxes, yeah, I know. Userbox, schmuserbox, this template is almost wholly unused, to the point where the accompanying category was speedied for a lack of members. However you feel about userboxes, this is not a useful or used userbox. (This was AFDed, by me, several months ago, and that AFD ended up being a mostly-ignored no consensus, with most users voting a variation of "Foo all userboxes!") - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 03:19, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. —MiraLuka 07:19, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete But NOT as CSD T1. --D-Day^{(Wouldn't you like to be a pepper too?, on WHEELS?!}) 14:56, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; subst if deleted; two users are actually transcluding this, and some others may well have substed it. Septentrionalis 21:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and subst if deleted per Pmanderson Sophy's Duckling 23:29, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep This box just led me to an article I would not have read otherwise. Keep unless you can show singularitanism to be non-notable. -MrFizyx 23:48, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pokémon Criminal Masterminds

Delete, not used and to small to be of much use.--JK the unwise 15:10, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Anonymous_anonymous_Have a Nice Day 20:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because of uselessness. Sophy's Duckling 23:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge to a more general Pokemon template (if wanted). -MrFizyx 23:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]