User talk:CieloEstrellado

Welcome!

Hello, CieloEstrellado, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Danke! ☆ CieloEstrellado 07:13, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saints Wikiproject

I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints. You can sign up on the page and add the following userbox to your user page.

{{User Saints WikiProject}}

This user is a member of
WikiProject Saints.

Thanks! --evrik 20:00, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mestizo pop. in Chile

Thank you for the link to the study. If your aim was to somehow suggest that the majority population of Chile wasn't mestizo, I'm affraid you've failed. I'm not sure why you quoted that study, given that it, like every other study on the population of Chile, has also found the population to be overwhealmingly mestizo. In fact, that very same study was mentioned in an analysis by the University of Chile which I had already wuoted, and which examined the population of Chile and its mestizo constitution. For much more detailed information and sources and quotes please see the discussion that was had at the User_talk:Epf#Mestizos in Chile and also discussions and more info at Talk:Demographics of Chile#Chile and my "vandalism".Al-Andalus 01:10, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Template Infobox President request

Hi, I replied on my talk page (as usual —see the disclaimer at the top). --Gennaro Prota ^(talk) 14:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Bullets_tmp_may_19_2006.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Bullets_tmp_may_19_2006.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:12, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Republic of Moldova

Your recent edit to Republic of Moldova was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 22:16, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look, this is foolish....

I suspect that neither of us has the time or the interest in embarking on an edit war.

Rather than simply reverting everything the other does, why don't we each read carefully the other's contribution and edit in a respectful manner the work of the other.

My guiding principle is to provide as much orderly information as possible. When you systematically revert information that is undisputed and provides context to a subject — especially when you object to one sentence, but by your indiscriminate revert edit out three pieces of undisputed fact — it really raises my hackles.

There is no reason that keeps us from finding a modus vivendi. I hope we can resolve this situation amicably. Regards, --MILH 13:17, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's personal when....

It's personal when you make a blanket dismissal of the facts that someone is presenting merely because you do not like the facts, or because you don't agree with the conclusions to which those facts lead.....

I insist: There is no reason this has to become an edit/revert war. If you think that any statement my edits make are POV, then challenge those specific edits, not the entire article.

--MILH 20:23, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First and only warning

I included the undisputed fact that Bachelet can speak some Russian and can read Cyrillic, and you are calling it vandalism. You are deliberately trying to smear my reputation because you do not like the undisputed facts that I am including in certain articles. I have also noted that you have been tampering with discussion entries of other editors.

If you continue with this libel, and if you continue to eliminate information that is accurate but which you do not care for, I will be forced to formally notify an administrator. Wikipedia adminstrators take very seriously precisely the attitudes and actions that you have been carrying out.

I have tried to solve these disputes in a civil manner. You have rejected my offer of civility, and instead have chosen an aggressive, libelous attitude. Most seriously of all, you have eliminated objective, undisputed facts, apparentley because you do not like the political inference that can be drawn from said information.

If you continue in this path, I will be forced to take immediate and drastic action. I will not bother warning you again.

--MILH 16:15, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]