Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2006 May 28

May 28

The following images have been linked to the article Max Ernst and improperly tagged as public domain.

Justin Foote 00:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Userbox red y.png
Derivative work and trademark infringment of the yahoo logo, despite being made from scratch. ed g2s • talk 01:32, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Doodie.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Farzonl (notify). OR, possible CV —PS2pcGAMER (talk) 02:38, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:yv9.jpg and Image:vj9.jpg

where to start... clearly spurious claim of "i made it myself" (copyright watermarking is clear on both pics). And the only reason these two hard porn photos were uploaded was so as they could be added to a (twice speedied and now protected) attack page. Can't see any way they quite qualify under speedy criteria, but hopefully someone will spot how they can. Grutness...wha? 04:37, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well all of the copyright rules in WP:CSD, not to mention vandalism. Speedy deleted. ed g2s • talk 11:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chase field 1.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by SportsFan411 (notify). CV. Free alternate can be taken. —fuzzy510 06:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete. There is no valid reason for deletion. There is no current free alternative and fair use is acceptable in that case for use in demonstrating an article. So unless you're going to upload a "free" image of the Talledega raceway there is no basis for this deletion. Gateman1997 18:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And the lack of a free alternative right now means that one must be created, not that a non-free image should be used in its place. --fuzzy510 18:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Scottsdale Stadium.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by FPAtl (notify). CV. Free alternative can be taken. —fuzzy510 06:17, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete. There is no valid reason for deletion. There is no current free alternative and fair use is acceptable in that case for use in demonstrating an article. So unless you're going to upload a "free" image of the Talledega raceway there is no basis for this deletion. Gateman1997 18:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And the lack of a free alternative right now means that one must be created, not that a non-free image should be used in its place. --fuzzy510 18:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tai O San Ki Bridge.jpg, CV--Shizhao 12:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Valleduparflag.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by F3rn4nd0 (notify). OB by SVG version Commons:Image:Valleduparflag.svg —MeekMark 13:52, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Normans cleave.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by SELlbydate (notify). Orphan (OR) --Marknew 15:17, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Valledupar cesar.JPG (talk | delete)

Uploaded by F3rn4nd0 (notify). OB by png version Commons:Image:Valledupar_cesar.png —MeekMark 15:20, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wallace In Battle.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Nukles (notify). OR —cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:48, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Image-calcutta victoria palace 03.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Harishmukundan (notify). OR —cholmes75 (chit chat) 16:19, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ds2f(2).png (talk | delete)

Uploaded by AppleJuicefromConcentrate (notify). CV, Apple symbol is used in logo, does not qualify for fair use-- The ikiroid 17:15, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Talledaga.jpg (talk | delete)

Uploaded by Gateman1997 (notify). CV. Free alternative can be taken. Was listed once, Uploader removed from list. —fuzzy510 18:01, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete. I removed it because there is no valid reason for deletion. There is no current free alternative and fair use is acceptable in that case for use in demonstrating an article. So unless you're going to upload a "free" image of the Talledega raceway there is no basis for this deletion. Gateman1997 18:06, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And the lack of a free alternative right now means that one must be created, not that a non-free image should be used in its place. --fuzzy510 18:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]