Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/RickK vs. Guanaco/Evidence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RickK (talk | contribs) at 21:39, 3 September 2004 (Other personal attacks by RickK: deleting non-relevant, non-peronal attack information). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Anyone, whether directly involved or not, may add evidence to this page. Please choose an appropriate header for your evidence and sign your comments with your name.

This page is not for general discussion - for that, see talk page.

If you disagree with some evidence you see here, please provide counter-evidence, or an explanation of why the evidence is misleading. Please do this under a separate header, to separate your response from the original evidence.

Be aware that the arbitrators may at times rework this page to try to make it more coherent.

Please add articles to this list as articles are found..

Discussions about the situation

Policy

  • Wikipedia:Banning policy
    • "As a general guideline, consider if you found the text in question on some open content website elsewhere - is it sufficiently high quality that you would copy it to Wikipedia. If not, you probably shouldn't reinstate it. Also, you should be aware of possible problems with the text. For example, if a banned user is known to be biased on some subject, you should be especially careful to check such text for bias."
    • "If a user does knowingly reinstate an edit by a banned user, they have taken responsibility for it, in some sense, so there is no benefit in reverting that edit again, and there is the risk of causing unnecessary conflict amongst the Wikipedia community."

Personal attacks

Personal attacks by Guanaco against RickK

Personal attacks by RickK against Guanaco

  • [1] "…Now don't you feel stupid?"
  • [2] "…And you just go ahead and try to put me on a RfA page and we'll see what people say about your arbitrary unblocking and blocking policy and see who wins. I'll go back and re-block that user now, and watch your ass because you'll be next.…"
  • [3] "[[Image:Barnstar.png]] in recognition of your repeated and devoted efforts to keep vandals happy and contented."
  • [4] "I finally see what you're up to with the unblockings that you've been performing. You've been outed by your nomination of Plato for sysophood. If you continue to unblock people, I will request that you be desysoped.
  • [5] "…You're just itching to unblock people, aren't you?"
  • [6] "…I will expect an explanation as to your selective enforcement of your own, unsubstantiated, blocking policy."
  • [7] "What the hell do you think this is? [8] Just so busy trying to cause trouble that you can't be bothered to check what people are doing? Am I really a liar, or are you just an idiot? I vote for idiot."
  • [9]