User talk:RevolverOcelotX

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello RevolverOcelotX! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Kukin i

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Kukini 16:16, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Deiaemeth 00:07, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

You're already in breach of the three revert rule on the Go (board game) article. If you continue with such edits, you're be immediately blocked. Please take your concerns to the article talk page and try and reach a consensus version. Deiaemeth 00:15, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 3RRV

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Incidentally, I blocked your friend Dei as well. JoshuaZ 01:46, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Rory096 07:32, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. --Rory096 07:57, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Lee

Stop changing the Bruce Lee page with that large graphic taking up so much space. What browser are you using???FrankWilliams 12:35, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RevolverOcelotX

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ShuckyDucky"

Funny I could actually apply same sentiment towards you. So none of my the revisions were up to your standard????? So I need a consensus from you???? Who do you need a consensus from?? Your Welcome ShuckyDucky 06:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you serious? I'm actually adding, and trying to fix mistakes. Besides the Bruce Lee Wiki is over recommended size, you have noticed that right? Please stop vandilising my hard work, Thank you ShuckyDucky 07:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RevolverOcelotX, removing content from Wikipedia IS NOT always considered vandalism: "..any material that is challenged and has no source may be removed by any editor."WP:CITE/WP:REF The question is whether or not the content was referenced to a verifiable and reliable source. --Electric Eye (talk) 10:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

108 Stars of Destiny

Theoretically, that article isn't supposed to just be on the Suikoden GAME series. That's why the stuff on the original story comes first. It's just that there's a lot more information (and editors who know stuff) about the games than the original. I'm not sure if it should be stuck in the Computer / Video Game category. SnowFire 00:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated violation

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Deiaemeth 02:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your move of Rail transport in Taiwan

I have reverted your move of Rail transport in Taiwan to Rail transport in the Republic of China. The article deals with rail transit systems in the geographical area of the island of Taiwan (which, as it happens, is the only part of territories under ROC jurisdiction where there are railways). This issue was discussed previously, please discuss any proposed changes at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese) before making any further changes. Thanks. -Loren 04:40, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is open to discussion here. Thanks. -Loren 04:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GunBound

The GunBound Article does not need expansion as it is already 30 kb in size and it is only by my work that I have been able to condense it into two separate articles. Fr e ddi e 14:26, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PRC as emerging superpower

Hello, thanks for your contribs. I wish to talk to you about the Political factors and you keep adding "Influence in East Asia" as a factor. I have read your point and that point definitely doesn't belong in the Political factor. It's more about spread and the importance of Chinese culture in Japan, Korea etcetera, and hence, it is a Cultural factor (already included there) not a Political factor. The Political factor is reserved for either direct political influence, economic influence, or military influence (see the other examples), not cultural influence (which is soft power). Please understand this. I am the one who added all those political factor points originally, and you can trust me that I have considered everything. The only considerable political influence China has in another East Asian country is only in North Korea, but I don't think it's worth mentioning (i.e. it's China's backyard anyway). You also would need references for future contribs. Heilme 23:55, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Same applies to you. And given you've been blocked for the 3RR before I think you have the problem, not me. John Smith's 22:23, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My Talk Page

If you have an allegation to make, do it in the formal channels. Otherwise please Act ;ole an adult. :) John Smith's 22:29, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Vandalism"

You're not fooling anyone. You're making tendentious edits to Asia and China related articles and attempting to "warn" anyone who opposes you to stop making completely legitimate reverts. YINever 00:12, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Lots of pages. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. YINever 00:27, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR block

I have looked at the complaint filed by YINever, and it appears that you have reverted four times within a 24hr span on Mao: The Unknown Story, leading to a 24hr block. Please use the talk page when this expires. your complaint against YINever does not appear to hold as the reverts need to be witihin a 24hr period Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 06:13, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing to Names of China. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. 72.65.80.34 15:11, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinking

hi, i noticed you making many minor stylistic edits in various articles. please note that generally, only the first mention of a term should be wikilinked, not later mentions. also, simple years or centuries generally should not be wikilinked unless they are siginificant subjects in themselves, although this is somewhat flexible. the main reason for wikilinking dates is for formatting preferences that work only when full dates (e.g. January 1, 2001) are used. please see WP:MOS and WP:MOSDATE for details. thanks. Appleby 16:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwan

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. 151.205.36.69 18:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]