Jump to content

2003–2004 Liberal Party of Canada infighting

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Tom (talk | contribs) at 21:12, 29 July 2004 (Effects: dab). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The period between Paul Martin's assumption of the leadership of the Liberal Party of Canada on November 14, 2003, and the 2004 Canadian election being called on May 23, 2004, saw a large amount of infighting within the party.

Traditionally the Liberals have been the most unified of Canada's major parties. The Progressive Conservatives would implode regularly, having done so under John Diefenbaker, Joe Clark, and Brian Mulroney, and the Canadian Alliance did so under Stockwell Day, but the Liberals had traditionally seen heated but soon forgotten leadership contests that did not harm party unity. A notable exception was the period after John Turner was elected leader.

Many pundits have dated the current split to that earlier era arguing that there is a clear division between the socially progressive, nationalist, and federalist wing of the party represented by Pierre Trudeau and Jean Chrétien and the fiscally conservative, pro-business wing of John Napier Turner and Paul Martin.

When the Liberals formed a majority government after the 1993 election with Chrétien at the helm, party unity was assured by placing Martin, whom Chrétien had defeated for the party leadership in 1990, in the crucial role of Minister of Finance.

Martin worked hard to become the clear successor to Chrétien, ensuring that most of the institutions of the Liberal Party were controlled by his allies. The split opened wider, however, in the summer of 2003 when Chrétien tried to curtail Martin's open campaigning for the leadership. Martin was about to resign from Cabinet when Chrétien fired him. Martin's influence in the party forced Chrétien to announce his retirement, however, and in December Martin took over.

While the issue of the party leadership was settled, at the lower levels unprecedented intraparty warfare began. Most of Chrétien's loyal cabinet ministers were relegated to the backbenches. Ministers such as John Manley, Allan Rock, Don Boudria, Sheila Copps, and Stephane Dion who had spent a decade running one of the most popular and successful governments in Canadian history were reduced to minor roles, and many of them decided to leave politics for the private sector.

Some Chrétien loyalists refused to retire, hoping to remain as backbenchers. The Martin Liberals arranged to defeat some of them in riding nomination battles. Unlike in previous elections incumbent Liberals were not backed by the party. Rather in many cases challengers received unofficial support from the Martinites.

Nomination battles

The highest profile battle was in the riding of Hamilton East–Stoney Creek between former Deputy Prime Minister and leadership candidate Sheila Copps and Martin loyalist and newly minted cabinet minister Tony Valeri. Copps was one of the most noted representatives of the party's left wing and had been a leading Liberal for decades, but lost the nomination battle, which she blamed on dirty tricks.

Other battles happened across the country:

Effects

The departure from parliament of many of the members of the left flank of the Liberals has meant that the party has moved much further to the right. On close issues, like last year's same-sex marriage vote, the outcome would have been different with the new group of Liberals.

The infighting has also embarrassed the party and, combined with the sponsorship scandal, hurt it in the polls. In the June 28 election the party failed to form a majority government, a great chnage from months earlier.

The fighting has also exacerbated internal party differences. With the parties sub-par perfromance in the t election, another round of bloodletting may ensue as the Chrétien wing tries to retake control of the party.

See also