Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:
The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
The eligibility to eventually become an administrator.
Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.
We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign your posts and comments with four tildes (~~~~), which will let others know who left it. --rxnd ( t | € | c ) 22:27, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with the page Seinfeld on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Akamad23:03, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- 65.103.86.243:
- I'm sorry. I've watched Bambi 2, and I know I'm wrong to put junk about Count Tunbarr when he doesn't even exist. I just didn't want to face the facts. I thought, "Hey, wouldn't it be cool if Bambi 2 had a villain?" But that was a negative thought. And hey, there are enough bad guys out there already in the Disney world. If you let me back to editing, it will be by the truth and the present! "" (note above)by 65.103.86.243
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. RexNL00:00, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again. RexNL00:00, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
STOP IT! LEAVE ME ALONE!! I DON'T CARE IF THERE ISN'T A COUNT TUNBARR IN BAMBI 2! JUST DROP IT AND STOP HOUNDING ME!! I'M GOING TO SCREAM! PLEASE! J-Just let me be free. I know I'm wrong, but if you want to yell, please don't do it at me. I'm begging you!
65.103.86.243
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. As you have admitted both above and in this edit, you are vandalising Wikipedia by putting knowingly false information into articles. Your threats to continue doing so will only hasten you getting banned if you continue. IrishGuy00:06, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Message: Listen, buddy. Cut the threats. You're ticking me off. Leave me alone, and I'll leave your stupid little article alone.End of line, the end, good-bye.
65.103.243
This isn't something we can, or will, haggle about. We're not going to cut a deal. Stop vandalising articles. When you do, you will be warned and then banned as you are a habitual vandal. IrishGuy18:18, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Misty (Pokémon)
Hello, I'm [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]]. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Misty (Pokémon) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|my talk page]]. Thank you. -- Irixman(t)(m)02:46, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your kind message. I will leave Misty's article alone. Come visit me if you have time, friend. 65.103.86.243
P.S. If IrishGuy warns you about me, just ignore him.
With all due respect, IrishGuy, I was assigned to do this by a couple of Wikipedian friends. See related talk pages for more info. 65.103.86.243
Wizard (Oz)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. IrishGuy23:09, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thanks for the message. And sir, what I said on the Tin Woodman article is true. Go to the Wicked article and you'll see why. 65.103.86.243
Reverted back to your version, it seems to be correct. You have quite a few warnings, thus why I jumped on it. Sorry. -- SonicAD (talk) 22:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That's okay. I have a bad history of false info, so that's understandable. Just keep doing your duty. 65.103.86.243
May 29
The joke is getting old. Humor's great, but Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia. It is time to straighten up and make serious contributions.
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Minor allies in Kim Possible, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Crazynas11:58, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits.Mahogany20:20, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
They're not personal views, IrishGuy. They're true. It says so in the book, even though it's not written. Sometimes, you have to see things in books that aren't there. 65.103.86.243
Actually, it doesn't even remotely say those things in the book. And if you can concede that they aren't written in there, how can you argue that it is in the book? No, these articles don't need your personal opinions. If you do it again, you will be warned for vandalism. IrishGuytalk19:49, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, my friend, sometimes you have to look at the good side of a person and bring that out. And in a way, what I say is pretty much true. Edmund was misjudged, as his brother Peter was always on his case, such as the beginning of the movie, when he accused Edmund of being selfish, and all he wanted was his father's photo, and vice versa. And once again, stop calling my contributions personal views. They are facts. Thank you for sharing your concerns, and if you want me to stop my business, put together an intervention. 65.103.86.243
A) it isn't a movie. The article is about the books. B) no, it isn't about finding something hidden deep within the text. Obviously you haven't read the books because Edmund was clearly described by the narrator and the other characters as devious and self-centered. Anything else is your own point of view and doesn't belong in this encyclopedia. IrishGuytalk09:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A. Fist of all, I was talking about the movie for clues. B. Yes, sometimes the deepest messages cannot be written in ink.I read the books, and had to look deeper into the person and see all the conflict inside. And you can look past the narrator's words of discrimination, and find that good part of someone, as I said before. And C, stop calling my editations personal views. If you put any more negative trademark on Edmund, I will hire a Wikipedian official to settle this nonsense. Signed, 65.103.86.243
The films is irrelevant as the article is about the character from the book. I couldn't care less what you personal believe you can read into a book, the fact stands that the character should be interpreted as written and not as you believe it should be. Your edits are personal views as your words even illustrate. Wikipedians aren't for hire. IrishGuytalk17:41, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That's it. We're having too much conflict on this page. Our business from here on in will be on Edmund's talk page. 65.103.86.243
You cannot possibly in good conscience argue here [4] that Edmund simply made bad choices and therefore wasn't evil, and then turn around and make edits like this [5] in other articles. IrishGuytalk18:22, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Enough. We have settled this issue once and for all, and that's final. And IrishGuy, do you have me on GPS? If you do, stop. I hate all this discrimination from you. All you're doing is making me mad. I have stopped vandalizing, and all I do now is contribute. If you hound me somewhere else one more time, I will ask an accomplise to block my talk page from being attacked. Go live your own life. And Mr. TrackFan, I did speak truth. Rose never was called off as Jake's crush. He proably does harbor feelings for her. And Mr. Rotwood is evil. He kidnapped Jake once, and another time tried to unleash an evil genie into the world. And IrishGuy, they are not personal views. And my Shift changes are true. Shift was evil, and he was killed by Tash. 65.103.86.243
Obviously, nothing is settled with you as you insist on putting personal views into articles. After numerous warnings. You continue to do so and boldy admit as such [6]. Stop. It is considered vandalism. IrishGuytalk02:42, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That's it! I've had it with you! I'm calling a Wikipedian to block you from editing my talk page. 65.103.86.243
There. So, Mr. IrishGuy, in a couple of minutes, RadioKirk's brilliant fingertips shall block you from complaining all this nonsense. I wish to talk to you again once you have cooled down. (smiley face) 65.103.86.243
I think you will note that I am not banned. Also, a quick perusal of this talk page and your edit history will illustrate to anyone that you continue to vandalize articles by placing your own beliefs into them regardless of how many other editors continue to revert your nonsense. IrishGuytalk05:22, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I do not vandalize pages. I put facts, not personal views. And I do not tolerate you making me look like an imbecile of Wikipedia. 65.103.86.243
And yet this talk page (as well as the one I linked above from one of your sockpuppet accounts) illustrate the numerous times you have been reverted for adding your own views. By multiple editors. A look through your edit history shows that the vast majority of your edits have been reverted because of vandalism of one nature or another. IrishGuytalk19:18, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Brock0820
Hi, I wasn't on vacation, I just wasn't on Wikipedia for awile because editing the May article became boring... Brock082007:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Thanks for telling me. I was just concerned. Is there a related article I can contribute to, if you need help? 65.103.86.243
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This is exactly what I am talking about [8]. Stop putting your own personal opinions into articles. Clearly, when a sentence starts with hopefully it is your own point of view. It isn't encyclopedic. IrishGuytalk09:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Calm down, IrishGuy. It was just a sentence. I never said Drakken would turn good, I said he might. There were clues, such as the Zorpox episode. 65.103.86.243
No. What you said was Hopefully, before the series ends... that is eminently a personal point of view and not even remotely encyclopedic. Please stop making edits like that. Stick to facts, not what you would like to believe. IrishGuytalk00:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.
Hello, I'm [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]]. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Misty (Pokémon) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|my talk page]]. Thank you. -- Irixman (t) (m) 02:46, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
