Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exopolitics (0th nomination)
Neologism, original research, dubious factuality, possible copyvio. - KeithTyler 20:50, Sep 17, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, "Exopolitics: A Decade of Contact" seems to say it all for me. -Vina 22:04, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Keep! - Its a real term, not neologism. -- Crevaner 23:20, 17 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- OK, then find me a dicdef at dictionary.com [1] or even Merriam-Webster [2]. Even WordSpy doesn't have it [3]. - KeithTyler 00:32, Sep 18, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Who boasts of an MEd? They come in the bottom of cereal boxes now. At any rate, when we get representation in the exoparliamentary bodies and can exoembargo the exostates, we will need to worry about exopolitics. For now, this is exorational. Geogre 00:21, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Good god, will we have to start worrying about losing our jobs to exoshoring? - KeithTyler
- Keep, its a good article. Eventually more information will be added to make it better. -- Old Right 15:53, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: The term does get over 4,000 Google hits, but the current content seems in need of, ummm, NPOVing? (Sigh) I'm trying not to mention tin-foil hats and I just failed.
No vote at present.Andrewa 18:27, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)- Nearly all of those have to do with Michael Salla (who owns exopolitics.org), Alfred Webre (who wrote the book Exopolitics), Universe Books (who supposedly published the book), or are spams posted to mailing lists and forums. I dunno. Does two people, a website, and a book all on a dubiously factual and neological topic count as notable? Some of those links claim that exopolitics is just another word for ufology. - KeithTyler
- Delete. Well put. Andrewa 07:02, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Nearly all of those have to do with Michael Salla (who owns exopolitics.org), Alfred Webre (who wrote the book Exopolitics), Universe Books (who supposedly published the book), or are spams posted to mailing lists and forums. I dunno. Does two people, a website, and a book all on a dubiously factual and neological topic count as notable? Some of those links claim that exopolitics is just another word for ufology. - KeithTyler
- Delete. Semi-proprietary jargon. Jallan 16:01, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete - Beam it up, Scotty. - Tεxτurε 17:04, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- (Ineligible anon vote:) Keep! I just finished a course in Exopolitics. - Robert Colee - http://global33.com
- !Keep! If Exopolitics is Deleted Wikipedia is NOT a Legitimate Encyclopedia. Exopolitics is a legitimate field of human knowledge and scholarly inquiry. There has been, for example, an International Exopolitics Conference, held in Washington, DC in April 2004, at which many of the researchers writing in the field of Exopolitics participated. Exopolitics
- Sockpuppet, first/only edit is this discussion. - KeithTyler
- (Ineligible anon vote:) !Keep! There is enough credible evidence pointing to the fact that we are not alone in the Universe. Former CIA remote viewers (www.courtneybrown.com / www.davidmorehouse.com & many more...), to former government/military whistleblowers (www.disclosureproject.org), to experiencers (www.centerchange.org/passport) to contactees (www.eceti.org) We need to evolve a potential political understanding of law in the Universe to better understand how we fit within its possible hierarchy of higher intelligence. Alfred Webre was the head investigator of President Carter's proposed ET/UFO investigation study in 1977 through Stanford Research Institute and has credentials. Our world is clearly being engaged by a higher intelligence and we need to find ways to establish diplomacy by first understanding how the Universe culture is organized. - Pierre, Sept. 20, 2004