Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unplugged podcast
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Retired username (talk | contribs) at 01:42, 26 June 2006 (Closing debate; result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:42, 26 June 2006 by Retired username (talk | contribs) (Closing debate; result was delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 01:42, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A podcast begun (checking watch) two days ago. Three guys and a mic: not notable. Was prod'ed and tagged for speedy deletion -- all tags removed without comment. Calton | Talk 02:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Highly non-notable. --Danielrocks123 02:40, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Do NOT Delete. The podcast is quite notable, many peopel know abotu it. THe blogspot is just 2 days old, we reasently moved, as for removal, that was unrelated to the podcast, by soem one else, this should not be delted, also there are many podcasts such as triangulation that are less notable than ours— Preceding unsigned comment added by Spektormax (talk • contribs)
- You'll need to cite a source if your right, otherwise it's your word against other peoples word.--Andeh 06:54, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless there are any reliable sources (press, journal articles, etc.) for the information presented. Ziggurat 02:59, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Gain notability, then come back and see us. -- Rjm656s 03:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete absurdly non notable - "One of the amazing things about the podcast is that it was only 6 hours from the initial idea to the release of the first episode". Please... Jammo (SM247) 03:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete. How often does it need to be said? Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Eddie.willers 03:54, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete obviously added by the owner, vanity/non notable basically per nom and others.--Andeh 06:55, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete, fails WP:NFT and WP:VAIN, and is simply a horribly-written article. --Coredesat 07:02, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above -- Samir धर्म 07:54, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per above. 6 hours from the idea to the release of the first episode? 1 hour from the article creation to being tagged for AFD. It wasn't fast enough though. I suppose WP:WEB applies too. - Motor (talk) 08:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Currently, there has only been one episode. 'Nuff said. - Mgm|(talk) 09:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as subject does not meet the criteria at WP:WEB.--Isotope23 18:23, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per above. TJ Spyke 23:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable and it fails too many WP policies. --WinHunter (talk) 00:30, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.