User talk:Mhking/Archive 4

; Archives
	Jan 2005 – May 2006; ; ; ;

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions to the coolest online encyclopedia I know of =). I sure hope you stick around; we're always in need of more people to create new articles and improve the ones we already have. You'll probably find it easiest to start with a tutorial of how the wikipedia works, and you can test stuff for yourself in the sandbox. When you're contributing, you'll probably find the manual of style to be helpful, and you'll also want to remember a couple important guidelines. First, write from a neutral point of view, second, be bold in editing pages, and third, use wikiquette. Those are probably the most important ones, and you can take a look at some others at the policies and guidelines page. You might also be interested in how to write a great article and possibly adding some images to your articles.

Be sure to get involved in the community – you can contact me at my talk page if you have any questions, and you can check out the village pump, where lots of wikipedians hang out and discuss things. If you're looking for something to do, check out the community portal. And whenever you ask a question or post something on a talk page, be sure to sign your name by typing ~~~~.

Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing! --Spangineer (háblame) 14:06, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

Selex (god)

Selex is not a joke. It is truth. If you have a problem send EMAIL to tyluthan@yahoo.com THANK YOUOuijalover 20:04, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I put the Selex (god) page on so it CAN be verified. I want the world to know that there are more religions in the world that people know about.Ouijalover 20:12, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Respect me and i will respect you. You can not verifiy you live in the US so delete your page. I dont want to be mean but you are being a hipocrite.Ouijalover 20:20, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I respect that you wish to make wikipedia a informative website but you should spend your time deleting things that need deletion. What I put up on wikipedia is not hurting anybody. And who cares if it is unverifiable. The existanse of Jesus is not verifiable. It could be a conspiracy theory. And that is my point: Do not delete anything unless it is harmful.Ouijalover 20:45, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. You know I am right and have a point. Just leave me alone. I aint hurting anyone. Go delete something like the " " entry. Or since it is unverifiable the jesus entry. Please just let me let the world know of my religion. Please just be a good person. I am not asking you to support it or join it. All I ask is that you respect our differences and let me put a page up. It is appropriat and it is not harmful. Thank you if you do decide to let me let the world knowOuijalover 00:19, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not trying to be a jerk either. And Like I said I respect that you are trying to make wikipedia a good place. Would it be acceptable to make the "Tyluthan" and Selex (god) pages under my user:ouijalover page. Thank you.Ouijalover 00:30, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU! please do not delete those pages too.Ouijalover 00:33, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to put a easy to find link into wikipedia so people will easily find my page? Thank youOuijalover 00:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware that i am probobly pissing you off with all the comments but how do you create a sub page?Ouijalover 00:52, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not mind could you put a link to my page on yours?Ouijalover 00:54, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VandalProof 1.2 Now Available

After a lenghty, but much-needed Wikibreak, I'm happy to announce that version 1.2 of VandalProof is now available for download! Beyond fixing some of the most obnoxious bugs, like the persistent crash on start-up that many have experienced, version 1.2 also offers a wide variety of new features, including a stub-sorter, a global user whitelist and blacklist, navigational controls, and greater customization. You can find a full list of the new features here. While I believe this release to be a significant improvement over the last, it's nonetheless nowhere near the end of the line for VandalProof. Thanks to Rob Church, I now have an account on test.wikipedia.org with SysOp rights and have already been hard at work incorporating administrative tools into VandalProof, which I plan to make available in the near future. An example of one such SysOp tool that I'm working on incorporating is my simple history merge tool, which simplifies the process of performing history merges from one article into another. Anyway, if you haven't already, I'd encourage you to download and install version 1.2 and take it out for a test-drive. As always, your suggestions for improvement are always appreciated, and I hope that you will find this new version useful. Happy editing! --AmiDaniel (talk) 02:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wisconsin Historical Society Link on NBC article

Hi Mhking

I noticed you removed the link to the NBC collection at the Wisconsin Historical Society. I think people would like to know where the corporate archives of NBC are located. I may have gone overboard with listing the size of the collection, but people normally don't associate Wisconsin as a major holder of mass media collections. The Wisconsin Historical Society is a government agency with an over fifty year committment to collecting mass media materials in the US. It is not selling anything, unless you count the photocopies of documents people produce during their visit to Madison.

The NBC papers at the WHS are the office files of NBC executives from 1921-1955. It's over 500 boxes of material. If you want to see how NBC changed from a radio to a television network, you don't go to New York, you come to Madison, Wisconsin. We also have the papers of United Artists, Rod Serling, Kirk Douglas, David Brinkley and hundreds of other well known media figures and organizations. This is partly due to the prestige of having the NBC collection, but it was also helped by the fact that no one else made an effort to even ask for this type of material in the 50's and 60's. United Artists gave us their scripts, posters, lobby card, pressbooks, legal contracts and more because UA saw no value to keeping them.

EWS23's RfA

Hello Michael! Thank you for your support of my request for adminship. I look forward to running into you more on the project. Thanks again, and if you ever see something you feel I could be doing better, feel free to leave me a message. E WS23 | (Leave me a message!) 02:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

diabled list

this is quick and you can delete this. I am trying to add a section that lists every player on the DL (disabled list) as of now. Please do ont interrupt my work again. This is not junk.

Ok

Ok you don't want to hear the truth so i'll ask you in a lying type of way, "Why did you remove my question for Jimbo Wales???" 61.102.220.70 15:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of text editors edit

Hi,

You just reverted a change I made to "List of text editors"

Link to edit

I feel like my addition is worthwhile. Perhaps this was a mistake?

Best, Andy

Question

You de-'vandalised' my edit to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Keith_Andrews_%28criminologist%29 and yet all I was doing was removing irrelevant garbage from that page which was neither talk, as per Wiki guidelines, nor pertinent. I've just edited it to be blank. I see no reason why it should have anything on it at all. If the person responsible for tinkering with the main page for that person thinks that that information is important enough then they should put it on the main page. Do you not agree ? And the info I added first time around was in reference to an accusation by them of me (?) writing "anonymous letters" and addressed to "George" (?) - see their last couple of edits to the main page. I was simply using the 'talk' page for the purpose for which it was intended.

Hi. I was wondering if I could put those Selex and Tyluthan pages up. I forgot to tell that threr is verifiability. The sources are just hard to get.Ouijalover 18:59, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am surely aware of the fact that I sound like a raving lunatic. But like I said there are two books out about it. They are just accessable only to a follower of Tyluthan. Plus I am 12. I am very smart but with my lack a philisofical skills I could never create religion. I don't expect you to believe that but please do. I still do not understand why I can not put it up. It is truthful and with the HBoT (Hoy Bible of Tyluthan) It is verifiable.Ouijalover 22:28, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. My name is jack abd I wanted to let you know that user:ouijalover is not insane. I will agree he is eccentric. But I am a tyluthan too. Tyluthan is real. May Me or Ouijalover put a page up for Tyluthan and Selex? PleaseTyluthan 22:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How do become and administrator?Ouijalover 22:51, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When I said there was only a few tyluthans i forgot to remamber the ones not in ct. there are about 3,000 tyluthans. And the HBoT is not secret. you just need to request it by email.Ouijalover 00:08, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tyluthan is not a joke. It is truth and you will have to believe me. And the tyluthan@yahoo is not a "personal" email. All tyluthans can access it.Please just deal with the pages that me and other tyluthans put up. It is not harmful and it is verifiable.Ouijalover 00:16, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I have said about 50 times the book is easy to get from email. Most of the followers are paranoid and do not like to be reaserched. If you want it send an email to tyluthan@yahoo.comHBot 00:25, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't you just leave the page alone? it is harmlessTyluthan 00:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tyluthan IS verifiable. the HBoT

I can all but the widely availible part.Tyluthan 00:58, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I already told you It can be accessed. You just need to request it ny Email.Tyluthan 13:29, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remember the Tyluthan Ritual Books can not be seen by the public including normal Tyluthans. That does not apply to the HBoT (Holy Bible of Tyluthan).Tyluthan 13:31, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tyluthan is not some sick joke. And even if it was you would still have to tolerate it because of the First ammendment wich clearly states FREEDOM OF RELIGIONTyluthan 13:34, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You know that deleteing thoses religios pages is a Felony Hate Crime? Just thought you should know. Lets just say you are luck we live in differend states or I'd press charges71.234.32.84 21:07, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted but i am still pissed. Mabey you should stop with the heavy duty deleting until you are an administrator.Ouijalover 00:46, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA/Gurch

Thanks for your support – Gurch 17:37, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Can't figure out how I'm a woodchuck, which means it's just as well that the edit was reverted. Thanks for the rollback on my user talk page. (I've been called a wooden f... Well, never mind that; I'm sure it was no one who knows me that well.) Geogre 22:44, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism to my user page

Thanks for reverting it! I didn't even notice until now! -- Chris Lester ^talk 09:16, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for reverting my talk page! I owe you one! – DakPow e rs (Talk) 04:09, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for Supporting my RfA!

My Request for Adminship succeeded, by a count of 54/6/1. If you see me doing something I shouldn't, let me know. Thanks again, Ian Manka Talk to me! 00:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks!

File:FA-22 Raptor.jpg

Thanks for voting!
Hello Mhking/Archive 4, and thank you so much for voting in my recent RfA. I am pleased to inform you that it passed with a final tally of (119/1/3), into the WP:100, so I have now been cleared for adminship and will soon be soaring above the clouds. I was overjoyed, shocked, and humbled by the tally, and, most importantly, all the support. Thank you. If there is ever anything you need, you know where you can find me. Take care.

--Pilot|guy 23:03, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just nominated you for administrator. I did it because I feel, even though you made me unhappy, you deserve it. If you do get it congratulationsOuijalover 23:28, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dresden files

All i did was add bullet points. How is that considered vandalism?

RfA thanks

Thank you very much for your support for my recent RfA, which I'm quite happy to announce has passed with a consensus of 67 supporting, 0 opposed and 0 neutral. I'm glad you took the time to evaluate my candidacy, and I'll be working hard to justify the vote of confidence you've placed in me. Please let me know at my talk page if you need any admin-related assistance, or simply if you have any comments on my performance as an admin. Thanks! TheProject 02:12, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support in my RfA!

Thanks for voting!
Hello Mhking/Archive 4, and thanks for your support in my recent RfA. I'm pleased to announce that it passed with a final tally of (96/0/0). I was overwhelmed by all of the nice comments and votes of confidence from everyone. Thanks again, and see you around! OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:21, 2 July 2006 (UTC) [reply]

RE: Pokémon

A Minor note here: I don't think what we reverted can be considered vandalism. Sure, the information does not belong in the main Pokémon article, but it's more of a NPOV violation more than anything else. PCEevee ^talk 12:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]