Jump to content

Television licence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KrakatoaKatie (talk | contribs) at 12:58, 15 July 2006 (merge sentences). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

You must add a |reason= parameter to this Cleanup template – replace it with {{Cleanup|July 2006|reason=<Fill reason here>}}, or remove the Cleanup template.

A television licence (or more correctly broadcast receiver licence, as it usually also pays for public radio) is an official licence required in many countries for all owners of television and radio receivers. It is a form of hypothecation tax to fund public broadcasting, thus allowing public broadcasters to transmit programmes without, or with only supplemental, funding from radio and television commercials. Television licensing is common in Europe, as well as in some countries of Africa and Southeast Asia, but is not used in the Americas (with the exception of the French overseas departments), while it has been replaced by government grants in Australia and was abolished in New Zealand when the country turned its public service channels into commercial revenue generators.

It was originally known as a radio licence, used to fund public radio broadcasting, and with the arrival of television some countries created a separate additional television licence, while some just increased the radio licence fee to cover the additional cost of TV broadcasting, changing the licence's name from "radio licence" to "TV licence" or "receiver licence". Today most countries fund public radio broadcasting from the same licence fee that is used for television, although a few still have separate radio licences, or apply a lower or no fee at all for consumers who only have a radio. Some also have different fees for users with colour or monochrome TV. Many also give discounts for elderly and/or disabled consumers.

In most countries with a receiver licence there are opponents to the system. Some of the critics dislike the very idea of a mandatory charge, and would rather see that all TV was commercial or that public TV should be a form of pay-TV, which those not interested in wouldn't have to pay for. Others would prefer that public TV and radio was funded directly by the Government through taxes, arguing that a fixed licence fee is unfair against low-income groups. However, opinion polls in most of TV licence countries have shown that an overwhelming majority prefer the current system, as it can give them access to TV that isn't driven by viewer numbers (and thus "dare" to show "difficult" programmes) and is free from commercials (although some public TV is partly financed via advertisements), and as the licence fee system gives the public TV companies, at least formally, more independence from the Government than they would have if they were financed through the tax system.

Europe

Albania

The Albanian licence fee is a symbolic US$ 0.50 per year. The public broadcaster RTSh is mainly funded directly from the government through taxes, with the remaining 35% coming from commercials and the symbolic licence fee.

Austria

In Austria, the annual television & radio licence varies in price depending on which state one lives in.

State Television Radio
Burgenland € 233.76 € 67.80
Carinthia € 255.36 € 73.80
Lower Austria € 243.36 € 70.20
Upper Austria € 206.16 € 60.60
Salzburg € 243.36 € 71.40
Styria € 262.56 € 76.20
Tyrol € 233.76 € 69.00
Vorarlberg € 206.16 € 60.60
Vienna € 242.88 € 70.68

Viewers in the German speaking province of South Tyrol, Italy can also receive ORF channels via terrestrial transmissions, but do not have pay a licence fee towards ORF.

Croatia

The licence fee in Croatia is about €100 per year per household with at least one radio or TV receiver. The amount is adjusted yearly, as it is indexed to average salary. The fee is the main source of revenue for national broadcaster Hrvatska Radiotelevizija (HRT). However, HRT's programmes are still not free of advertisements (although the percentage of air time which may be devoted to advertising is limited by law and is lower than the one that applies to commercial broadcasters).

Cyprus (Republic of Cyprus)

The licence fee in Cyprus is indirect but obligatory and paid through electricity bills. The amount to be paid varies according to the total floor area of the property. Its beneficiary is the state broadcaster Cyprus Broadcasting Corporation (CyBC).

Denmark

The licence fee in Denmark is DKK 2,090 (around 280) per annum for colour TV, DKK 1,310 for black and white TV and DKK 320 for radio.

Finland

The licence fee in Finland is 200.70 per annum for a household with TV (as of 2006). It is the primary source of funding for Yleisradio (YLE). The amount is being adjusted yearly for reasons including transition to digital television.

France

In 2004, the television licence fee in France (mainland & Corsica) is 116.50 and in the overseas departments (where viewers receive the Reseau France d'Outre Mer (RFO) rather than France 2-France 3-France 5-Arte) it is €74.31. Source: Service-public.fr

Germany

The licence fee in Germany is 204.36 per annum for TV and radio, and 66.24 for just radio. It is billed by the month, but typically paid quarterly (yearly payments are possible). Unemployed, disabled and generally people (nearly) solely dependent on governmental support for living do not need to pay the licence fee. From 2007, the German government will establish a licence fee for every working Internet access, if it is the only source for radio and television.

Viewers in the German speaking province of South Tyrol, Italy can also receive German public TV and radio channels via terrestrial transmissions, but do not have to pay a licence fee.

Greece

The licence fee in Greece is indirect but obligatory and paid through electricity bills. The amount to be paid varies according to the total floor area of the property. Its beneficiary is the state broadcaster Elliniki Radiophonia Tileorassi (ERT). There has been some discussion about imposing a direct licence fee after complaints from people who do not own a television set and yet are still forced to fund ERT.

Ireland

In 2006, the television licence in Ireland is 158, up from €155 in 2005. It is free to anyone over the age of 70 and to some over 66. The licence fee is the primary source of revenue for RTÉ, the state broadcaster; however, its radio and TV stations also broadcast advertising to supplement this income, and operates some services, such as RTÉ 2fm, RTÉ Aertel and rte.ie, as well as their transmission network on an entirely commercial basis.

The licence fee does not entirely go to RTÉ. After collection costs, 5% is used for the Broadcasting Commission of Irelands "Sound and Vision Scheme", which provides a fund for programme production and restoration of archive material which is open to applications from any quarters. 5% of what RTÉ then receive is granted to TG4, as well as a requirement to provide them with programming.

Italy

In 2005, the licence fee in Italy was 99.60 per household with a TV set. It is the primary source of income for RAI, which does, however, also broadcast advertising.

Northern Cyprus (Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus)

Northern Cyprus (TRNC) does not pay the Cypriot licence fee as Cypriot jurisdiction is not applicable in the North. Bayrak Radio and Television Corporation, the North's public broadcaster gets it funds through the North Cypriot government.

Norway

The licence fee in Norway is NOK 1,969 (about 260) per annum (2005). The fee is mandatory for any owner of a TV set, and is the primary source of income for Norsk Rikskringkasting (NRK).

Sweden

The 2006 licence fee in Sweden is SEK 1,968 (about 210) per annum. It is collected on behalf of the three public broadcasters (Sveriges Television, Sveriges Radio and Sveriges Utbildningsradio by Radiotjänst, which is jointly owned by them. The fee pays for five TV channels and 16 radio channels. In Sweden, the term "television licence" was replaced a few years ago by "television fee", which was regarded as less ambiguous.

Switzerland

The licence fee in Switzerland is CHF 450.35 (about 292) per annum for TV and radio.

Viewers in the German-speaking region of South Tyrol, Italy can also receive the Swiss German-language channels via terrestrial digital transmissions, but do not have pay a licence fee.

United Kingdom

From April 2006 the fee is £131.50 (about €187) for colour TV and £44 (about €63) for monochrome TV. There are concessions for the elderly (free for over 75s, except Jersey [1]) and blind people (50% off). Those who only listen to radio no longer have to pay a licence fee. Previously, the collection and administration of the UK licence fee was the responsibility of the Home Office, but since 1991 the sole recipient of the fees, the BBC, is also responsible for the collection and administration of them. They in turn have contracted out the work to three companies, Capita, Revenue Management Services and AMV Consortium, working together under the trading name TV Licensing.

Asia

Israel

The television licence for 2006 in Israel is 400 Shekels (about 70 or $90). The licence fee is the primary source of revenue for the Israel Broadcasting Authority, the state broadcaster; however, its radio stations carry full advertising and its TV programmes sometime receive "sponsorship" from commercial entities to supplement this income.

Japan

In Japan, the annual licence fee for terrestrial television broadcasts is ¥15,490 (about €110) (slightly less if paid by direct debit) and ¥25,520 (about €178) if you receive satellite broadcasts. There is separate licence for monochrome TV, and fees are different in Okinawa. The Japanese licence fee pays for the national broadcaster NHK.

While every household in Japan with a television set is required to have a licence, there is no penalty for non-payment, and people are legally entitled to stop licensing inspectors from entering their houses.

Korea, Republic of

In South Korea, the television licence fee is collected for KBS (Korean Broadcasting System) and it has been about 2500 per year (about €2) for 21 years. Its purpose is to maintain public broadcasting in South Korea, and to give public broadcasters the resources to do their best to produce and broadcast public interest programs. The fee is collected by the national electrical company (Korean Electric Power Company) and is famous for its high collection rate.

Malaysia

Malaysia abolished the TV licence at the end of 1999.

Singapore

The cost of the TV licence for a household in Singapore is S$110 (about €57). Additional licences are required for radios and TVs in vehicles (S$27 and S$110 respectively).

Other Asian countries

Public broadcasters are funded either by the government through general revenues, like Public Television Service Taiwan, or by selling advertising, like China Central Television.

Africa

South Africa

The licence fee in South Africa is R225 (about €31) per annum for TV. A concessionary rate of R65 is available for those over 70, and disabled persons or war veterans who are on social welfare.

Oceania

Australia

Radio licence fees were introduced in Australia in the 1920s to fund the first privately owned broadcasters which were not permitted to sell advertising. With the formation of the government-owned Australian Broadcasting Commission in 1932 the licence fees were used to fund ABC broadcasts while the privately owned stations were permitted to seek revenue from advertising and sponsorship. Television licence fees were also introduced in 1956 when the ABC began TV transmissions. All licence fees were abolished in 1974 by the Australian Labor Party government led by Gough Whitlam on the basis that it was an unfair and regressive tax. The ABC has since then been funded by government grants, now totalling around A$800 million a year, and its own commercial activities (merchandising, overseas sale of programmes, etc.).

New Zealand

Licence fees were first used in New Zealand to fund the radio services of what was to become the New Zealand Broadcasting Corporation. Television was introduced in 1960, and with it the television licence fee. The licence fee was capped at NZ$100 a year in the 1970s, and the country's two television channels, while still publicly owned, became increasingly reliant on advertising. Later known as the public broadcasting fee, the licence fee was finally abolished in New Zealand in 1999, partly because the administration costs to collect the tax relative to the level of revenue was unviable, and also because the TV channels had become commercial revenue generators for the government with hardly any public service obligations left.

North America

The reasons why the idea of a licence fee never caught on in Canada or the United States bear some differences.

Canada

The Canadian public broadcaster, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, lagged slightly behind the private American broadcasters in providing radio and then television service to Canadians. Thus unlike the BBC, the CBC has always had to compete with other English language stations for its viewing audience - or more accurately, for most of its viewing audience. Many, but not all, Canadians have access to radio and television signals from stations in the northern U.S. Thus, a licence fee to own a television would almost certainly have been viewed as patently unfair by those Canadians who could only watch one and later two channels, while others would pay presumably the same fee and get four and later five. Moreover, by the late 1950s through to early 1960s, close to every Canadian household would acquire a television set, thus giving limited weight to the argument that a licence fee is fair to those who do not own a television. As a result, the Canadian government chose to fund the CBC from its general revenues, although CBC Television also sells advertising to cover some of its expenses.

United States

In the U.S., privately-owned radio (and later television) stations selling advertising quickly proved to be commercially viable enterprises during the first half of the twentieth century, which presumably proved to the American government that it did not need any sort of scheme such as a licence fee to force the end user to pay for the services he or she was listening to or watching. The United States did eventually create the Corporation for Public Broadcasting in 1967, which would eventually be used to help fund the Public Broadcasting Service and National Public Radio. However, this endeavour is funded through general revenues, and PBS, NPR and their affiliated stations also receive substantial funding in the form of donations from private citizens and charitable organisations.

An additional factor is the somewhat different meaning of the term license (licence) in the USA. A license is a form of regulation, not taxation, i.e. a (usually inexpensive) document that says the holder is allowed to do something. Actions that can potentially harm others (such as driving on the public roads, or operating a television transmitter) are licensed. Actions that do not infringe on the rights of others (such as operating a television receiver) are not. Most Americans would be outraged at the thought of needing a license, i.e. government permission, to watch TV or listen to the radio. Because of this different meaning of the word license, the "television license" of Europe and the UK would probably be referred to as a "television tax" or "user fee" if it were proposed in the USA. However, since television in the USA is overwhelmingly dominated by private enterprise, such a tax or fee is unlikely. (The annual funding for public television is about $2 per capita, such a small amount doesn't warrant a separate tax.)