User talk:Oiboy77/archive1

Archives
	1

Israel

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kari Hazzard (T | C) 07:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's you who are edit warring and reverting peoples work without any thought. Please read Wikipedia's policy of 3 Reverts.

Please refrain from adding bogus tags. Blnguyen | rant-line 07:34, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean bogus tags??

Well, where is the vandalism? Blnguyen | rant-line 07:40, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reverting a page, calling the editor a vandal and then reverting WITHOUT explaination is Vandalism.

This is your last warning. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again. Kari Hazzard (T | C) 08:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is exactly what you did to your talk page.

I did not revert your edits to my talk page. That said, I also did not vandalise the article and therefore your report was bogus. Kari Hazzard (T | C) 08:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted someones work without FIRST seeking consensus on the talk page, you then went on to accuse me of vandalism for reverting the page to a previous edit. --Oiboy77 08:20, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Claiming that Israel is actually a part of Palestine is flagrant vandalism... I do not need to seek consensus for any edit, let alone reverting an obvious a case of vandalism. See WP:BB and WP:VAND. That said, if edits I made were vandalism, which they were not, they would, and should, have been reverted. Kari Hazzard (T | C) 08:26, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't the fact that YOU consider that vandalism POV. Tagging me with a vandal tag for reverting to something I didn't even right though agree is ludacris and childish.--Oiboy77 08:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oiboy77 is not just a vandal. He/she/it is a WP:TROLL. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 09:12, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Humus case

Hi Oiboy77

I'm listed as involved in this - was it you who cited me and if so in what way do you think I relate to it? (I'm glad the problems of POV in this and related articles are being raised.) Thanks. Itsmejudith 11:01, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]