User talk:Aeon1006

3.25 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 22:10, 14 October 2024 (UTC)change[reply]

Leave a new message.

Current Mediation/Advocate Availiblity

Aeon Not available for a Medation Case at this time.

Aeon's Main Page

Mediation
Leave Message
Trophy Cabinet
WikiThanks Images
RfA's I have Supported
RC Patrol Stats
My Humor Userbox Page

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 3 days are automatically archived to User:Aeon1006/Archive-Alpha. Sections without timestamps are not archived

Discussion Conventions

Please post new messages at the bottom of the page to prevent confusion, Thanks.
Please sign your comments. Type ~~~~ after your text or use the edit toolbar.
Please use section headings to separate conversation topics.

See: Wikipedia:Civility

NOTE: Comments expressed on this talk page do not reflect the ideas or beliefs of Aeon.

Thank you for the Barnstar

File:MATTTREVITHICKMOON.JPG

You have the sun, now have the moon, so you will have light even on the darkest nights. - LA @ 20:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ribbon creation. I will link to it now. Believe it or not, the sun and the moon hold special significance in my life, so I like giving these. :) - LA @ 20:35, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Happy Birthday

Thank you very much, Aeon, for you birthday wishes toward me, but it is not my birthday until another six months!! If you can tell me where you got my birthday information, I would like to remove it so I don't have to waste people's time by wishing me happy birthday when it's not! Thanks a bunch though for your message, it cheered me up even though it's not my B-day. PS: My birthday is January 22nd! Thanks again! Also, it appears that you are not the person who seems to have made the same mistake, [1]. Thanks anyway! Iolakana|^T 20:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's still good. I get cake! Iolakana|^T 20:35, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes consolidation support

What's on the slab Do not use these templates yet

You have recently either supported my userbox consolidation efforts or at least applauded them. Currently, I am putting together another larger batch of userbox deletions which will have master templates. (The master templates are not "live" yet.) Would you be willing to support me in this and any future consolidations? There will probably be a lot of resistance at first to this, so having a group of people supporting me would be greatly appreciated.

At the moment, 5 master userboxes are in the works to replace 72. That may increase significantly if I can get the sixth one to work as I would like. Some of the templates to be replaced are widely used, but with the consolidated templates there is more funcitionability.

Please let me know, you can click [edit] above as this conversation is transcluded to all.

Sent to: Aeon1006, Andrew c, BigDT, Billpg, Brian Olsen, Cyde, Gperrow, Khaosworks, Luna Santin, Marcus-e, MiraLuka, NKSCF, Pegasus1138, Phil Boswell, Plange, RedZebra, Rfrisbie, Riana dzasta, Stefanmg, and Tuspm
Lady Aleena talk/contribs 22:02, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, that's an interesting use of transclusion. :) Can't promise I'll always vote to support, but I imagine that in many cases I will. Feel free to let me know when you post them (I tend not to watch TfD too often), and as always I'll be more than willing to lend what technical advice I can. Luna Santin 22:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lady Aleena, as noted in an earlier discussion with you, I think consolidation is fine for thematically related userboxes. However, I also support diversity through mass customization, so I'm more inclined to support consolidations that maintain display differences in images, colors and especially wordings. That's easy enough to do with parser functions. I wish you all the best. Regards, Rfrisbie^talk 22:16, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As per the two posts above, I might very likely support it but I'll determine it on a case by case basis. Pegasus1138^{Talk | Contribs | Email} ---- 22:18, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't overly care too terribly much. I will say that I think having generic userboxes is a good thing from one standpoint - it helps newbies learn Wikicode. If you can't just add {{User Hokie}} to your page but instead have optional parameters like {{User Hokie|year=2001|border=maroon|major=CS}}, that's definitely a good thing. BigDT 22:21, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Same here - case by case. I only voted on the Doctor Who box because it was part of the Wikiproject, anyway. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 22:25, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just let me know when you need my support LA, Most od th eboxes I use are aprt of a wikiproject anyways or made myself Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 23:49, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't use userboxes, I only got into this because of the Doctor Who project. But I'd take a look on a case by case basis, certainly. --Brian Olsen 02:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with BigDT. Userboxes with optional parameters taught me how to use Wikicode. A master template isn't a bad idea... hell, it should be like that for most userboxes. — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • 02:24, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do like this use of transclusion. I think I'll vote on a case by case basis, but I do like and support the idea as a whole. —Mi ra 02:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also take a look on a case-by-base basis. --Gperrow 17:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have appreciated your efforts so far and will extend my support to similar "consolidation" projects. RedZebra 13:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you know of anyone who may be interested in this, just transclude this to their talk page as it is transcluded to yours. - LA @ 06:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thumbs up! Stefanmg 11:49, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa ... time travel! ;) BigDT 12:44, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry... I always copy some of previous posts. It's easier... I just forgot to change the date Stefanmg 17:49, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So Far I like what you have done! See your Talk page to find out How much! Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 20:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One concern I have about this form of communication on a topic that admittedly might be controversial is the potential for accusations of recruiting for votestacking. What are others' views on this? Rfrisbie^talk 21:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I had wondered about this, but unless I am mistaken, this is an uncontroversial tidy up operation. Stephen B Streater 21:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a lot of you have said, you will take my recommendations on a case by case basis. That tells me that you are ready, willing, and able to tell me when I have crossed the line. - LA @ 21:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is just anticipating a potential issue so you can prepare for it. If anyone ever puts up a stink, you might want to disclose this page is here. But then again, it might never come up. :-) Rfrisbie^talk 21:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since we don't vote on Wikipedia it should not be an issue hopefully. Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 00:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Other consolidations

Myers-Briggs

ENFJ: 26
ENFP: 48
ENTJ: 30
ENTP: 46
ESFJ: 15
ESFP: 7
ESTJ: 19
ESTP: 8
INFJ: 43
INFP: 80
INTJ: 135
INTJ2: 45
INTP: 151
INTP2: 34
ISFJ: 13
ISFP: 13
ISTJ: 69
ISTP: 42

Rfrisbie...have you thought about getting your Myers-Briggs templates deleted in favor of the combined one that Thadman created? That would be another 18 deleted. I did a survey of how many people were using each...

Some people have more than one of these on their user pages, so some of those are duplicates. I know that some look like a lot of people use them, but once we get people migrating from individual templates to master templates, it will get easier and easier to consolidate them. Hopefully we can keep user templates in Template space if we can show that we can police them. - LA @ 22:48, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LA, of course, we all know they're not “my” templates. I just moved some to userspace as part of the effort to find a userbox compromise most people could live with. I wasn’t kidding when I said I support diversity in userboxes. Although I think Thadman’s userbox {{User:The Thadman/Userbox/MBTI}} is cool, it displays differently than the others – only one color scheme with a set of profile scores – and it doesn’t use categories . I don’t have any problem with it or another template designed to consolidate the existing features of the other boxes for “elegance” reasons, as long as no features are lost. However, I do not see a “need” to do it. On a web site that went from 1 million articles to over 1.25 million in about four months, I really consider the number of userbox pages to be a non-issue. I’m also not aware of any material debates on keeping userboxes in templatespace if someone polices them. Maybe you can show me a link or two on that. In this particular case, it’s even more superfluous because all personality boxes already are in userspace (User:Rfrisbie/Userboxes/Personality) and the Wikipedia directory page was deleted. [2] Rfrisbie^talk 02:08, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See my comments on GUS on the WikiProject Userboxes talk page. - LA @ 11:49, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link. What that shows me is that you are very well-intentioned in your efforts, your rationale for this process as a means to keep userboxes in template space is not supported by consensus, and the specific case of the Myers-Briggs templates does not apply, since they already are ugly in userspace. Sorry, I'm still not convinced of the need or consensus to do this. However, if you're still interested in combining the boxes for "efficiency," without changing the displays or categories, it's fine with me. Rfrisbie^talk 12:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I have only gotten one reply to my initial statement. I wish that more people would comment for I really want to keep user templates in the template space. I will never use a user template in user space. - LA @ 22:37, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that LA I have been dealing with other issues, I agree with what your doing it should make things a lot simpler. Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 17:40, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOTR

I've found a few more that may be worth consolidating: the LOTR userboxes. Luna Santin 02:54, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking at those, however the merged template would have to have standardized wording. I will give it a good think. - LA @ 04:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Live master user templates

I have made four of those master templates live. I will not start the TfD process on the ones they are replacing for at least a week. I want to see how well they catch on without a TfD first. However, do you think that I could slip a little note onto the to be TfDd templates noting the new master without too much censure. The message would be in the box appearing on the user pages like a TfD, but not as obtrusive. - LA @ 06:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Might be a good idea. What do the others think? Æon ^{Insane Ward} 06:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it. — riana_dzasta • t • c • e • 11:14, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the card game user templates have been marked with a message about the master template. The ones which are of different design are not marked as of yet. - LA @ 22:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for deletion in progress

Here are the TfDs in progress...

August 7

~~User chess variants~~

~~Card game user templates~~

~~Idol series user templates~~

~~Newspaper types user templates~~

August 11

~~Prison Break~~

~~Law & Order series~~

Go take a look and tell the community what you think. - LA @ 07:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Checked them out, went delete on all. Great Job LA! Æon ^{Insane Ward} 20:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Aleena's userbox consolidation desk

If you find a group of userboxes which you think could be merged, place them on my userbox desk. Please alphabetalize them over the Edit section with NEW in the section name so it stands out a bit. I currently have 6 projects there. - LA @ 00:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More user template deletions

To those who are still watching this, please see Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 August 25/User templates and give your opinion. - LA @ 08:14, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I need a cup of tea

Hi Aeon, I've been watching a Talkpage that got hot and I'd like to offer up a "nice cup of tea" so maybe editors could calm down for a bit. Trouble is, I can't figure out how to do the *&(^%$# thing! If you know how, could you please post a "nice cup of tea" on my Talkpage so that I can pass it around? Thanks! --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 05:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your help; I have strategically deployed the tea :) --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 05:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks for your most recent comment on my page as well. I know that I, and many, many others appreciate your contributions here as well. You do a lot of good work in the community! --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 20:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Barnstar!

Hi Aeon!
Thanks a lot for the barnstar! It's really great to be recognised like that! Thanks, --Fir0002 06:00, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Encouragement

Thanks Aeon for the general encouragement (re: Esperanza and barnstar). I've been an active member since 2002, but am trying to get more involved in the community now. Greetings from Texas. Nathan Beach 16:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roger that! and Greating from the US Navy in California. Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 16:45, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Mediation Cabal

The user involved is Triddle. If you refer to the edit history you will see he has reposted a picture of himself on several occassion after editors have removed it.JakGd1 21:09, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And hey, thanks for taking this on, it looks like this may be a complicated issue about conflict of interest instead of just a simple discussion about a picture. JakGd1 19:29, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

my entry for mediation

Hello,

You left a message on my talk page that someone has started mediation against me. I can't find a link to where this mediation is taking place. Can you please let me know on my talk page about how I can defend my actions? Thanks! Triddle 01:14, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I found a link to the mediation cabal through your user page, and found my entry there. I'll leave comments on the talk page at my entry. Triddle 01:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll accept a non-binding mediation request. Triddle 01:51, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Aeon, since the mediation has been put on hold at the request of the original initiator I'm going to take the initiative and ask that you analyze my actions anyway. Can you please let me know what I might of done wrong? Please also respond on my talk page. Thanks! Triddle 22:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

LOL, it looks like I may have jumped the gun on this one; an outcome of "Keep and Merge" seems likely, and in retrospect that's probably what I should have done in the first place. Oh well, WP is a learning process :) --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 16:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the AfD pointer, your nom was much better than mine. Maybe one day we can put on our combat boots and really stomp on some of these crappy articles! --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 16:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation suggestion

I would be interested in pursuing mediation, but I don't think IB or UCRG would. If either of them would want to pursue mediation with me I would be glad to go along with it.--Amerique 19:35, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was an excellent suggestion; I hope it bears fruit. --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 19:50, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Me to, I suggested only the two of them for starts. Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 20:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and I was tempted to broadcast it more widely, but waited until I heard from you. Limiting the number of participants seems to have both advantages and disadvantages: It's a lot easier to get a reasonable dialogue going between 2 people than 7. OTOH, the larger situation (of editing the article itself) will require a consensus among all participants. Still, you you've got to start somewhere :) --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 20:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I sugested IB and AMerique to start with since they have started talking over the survey on the UCR Article and agreed on an issue with it. It seemed the best way to start a resolution. Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 20:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion. At this point I think things are moving along better than they had been, so I don't think that mediation is necessary as of right now. Insert-Belltower 23:31, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Research Survey Request

Hello, I am a member of a research group at Palo Alto Research Center (formerly known as Xerox PARC) studying how conflicts occur and resolve on Wikipedia. Due to your experience in conflict resolution on Wikipedia (e.g., as a member of the Mediation Cabal) we’re extremely interested in your insights on this topic. We have a survey at http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=400792384029 which we are inviting a few selected Wikipedians to participate in, and we would be extremely appreciative if you would take the time to complete it. As a token of our gratitude, we would like to present you with a PARC research star upon completion. Thank you for your time.

Parc wiki researcher 23:41, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
PARC User Interface Research Group

Surreal

Thanks so much for the Surreal Barnstar. I'm always happy if I can make someone's day a little stranger :) --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 03:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Turn

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

I award you this wiki-armor on behalf of a grateful community, for your continued efforts in targeting vandalism and helping make this wiki a better place.

Just try to keep smiling : ) --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 03:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This was long overdue and I think it will make a fine addition to your collection. Carry on soldier, carry on. --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 03:19, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed several vandalisms in a row on your page recently. Does it mean you had a successful Vandal Patrol, when you draw that much heat? --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 05:20, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep! I really should add a Purple Barnstar to may page one of these days! Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 00:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aeon1006, I think that you should resign permanently from the AMA

Hello again. I just wanted to say that even though you weren't my advocate for the UC Riverside article dispute, I must say that I was absolutely appalled by your actions as Insert-Belltower's advocate. Honestly, I think you're a good person. I think you were trying to be fair. I think that you were trying to do what you thought was right, and you were frustrated that I-B was being himself, while Amerique et al were being "especially nice" to win you over. However, what you SHOULD have done, in my opinion, was do what you promised to do - be Insert-Belltower's advocate. Your duty was not to be the judge or to decide who was right. Your responsibility to I-B was to be his advocate, to represent him, and to be act in his best interests. A good analogy would be a public defender representing a child molester. Even though that public defender likely disagrees greatly with his client's actions, he still has a fundamental and ethical duty to represent that child molester and act in his client's best interests. You are clearly unable to do this. You immediately took sides in the case, and you make excuses for it (i.e. blame Insert-Belltower). ...and to add icing on the cake, you completely breached the trust held in you and you started actively assisting Insert-Belltower's opposition, using the knowledge and trust he had placed in you. It doesn't GET any more unethical and irresponsible than that, in my eyes. Someone who has demonstrated such gross inability or unwillingness to act on someone's behalf without letting your personal beliefs/opinions get in the way should NOT be an advocate on WP. I hereby request that you permanently resign from the AMA. I have attached the following as a skeleton account of your advocacy for I-B:

Copy/pasted: I am concerned about the recent behavior of Aeon1006, a volunteer advocate of Wikipedia’s Association of Members’ Advocates (AMA).

It has come to my attention that Aeon1006 violated the trust of his client, Insert-Belltower, and acted in such a manner that was unbecoming of an advocate.

The facts of the matter are as follows:

On July 11, 2006, Aeon1006 agreed to be an advocate for Insert-Belltower, who was seeking help defending against hostile efforts of editors Amerique and WHS.

On July 12, 2006, Aeon1006 sought statements from Insert-Belltower (I-B), but strangely, also an opposing opinion’s from I-B’s direct opposition, Amerique and WHS. He did so without consulting with his client, I-B.

On July 12, 2006, Aeon1006 requested that ElKevbo bring his opinion into the discussion. ElKevbo was a party known to oppose I-B, and his testimony was in opposition to I-B’s cause.

On July 13, 2006, WHS (opposing side) complained to Aeon1006 that Insert-Belltower had made unauthorized changes to his user talk page. In response, Aeon1006 wrote “Thank you I will investigate that and notify Mackensen [admin].” Instead of advocating on behalf of his client, Aeon1006 attempted to bring charges against Insert-Belltower with the admins. In fact, he ratted out his client to this admin on his talk page.

On July 14, 2006, Aeon1006 attempted to required all editors to obey the “fairness of tone” policy in their TALK discussions. However, Aeon1006 erroneously applied WP:NPOV#Fairness_of_tone to TALK discussion, when this rule specifically applies to article content.

On July 15, 2006, Aeon1006 demanded, in a public discussion, that his own client apologize to individuals for sockpuppetry, even though I-B’s alleged sockpuppetry did not actually affec any of these particular individuals (occurred at a different time).

On July 15, 2006, Aeon1006 wrote that his client was “stubborn.”

On July 16, 2006, Aeon1006 began assisting I-B’s direct opposition, Amerique – volunteering to submit an RfC against I-B’s side of the disagreement. As an advocate, Aeon1006 had access to privileged and confidential information from I-B – Aeon1006 now violates that privileged role and has agreed to use his knowledge to support the party that originally opposed his client.

A quick read through each of Aeon1006’s statements on his desk reveals that NONE of his comments were in support of his client. About a third of them were in opposition to I-B, and another third were essentially praising I-B’s opposition. As you can see, even from day #1, (July 12), Aeon1006 failed to fulfill his duty as I-B’s advocate, despite his promise to do so. It is certainly possible that Aeon1006 did not agree with his client’s position. If that were the case, then the appropriate and responsible action, under his duty as AMA advocate, would be to let I-B know that he couldn’t represent him. Instead, Aeon1006 took actions that hurt his client’s position. Aeon1006 never gave I-B the benefit of the doubt, or discussed with him in private the best way to handle the case. A quick review of I-B’s talk page will reveal almost zero help from Aeon1006. The last straw, was when Aeon1006 took advantage of his role as confidant and privileged position as I-B’s advocate to file an RfC against I-B’s party on behalf of Amerique, I-B’s direct opposition.

All of the above can be confirmed by reading Aeon1006's talk page, where he supposedly acted as an advocate for I-B, but instead hindered him and supported his opposition instead. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aeon1006/AMA

REGARDLESS of whether I-B was in the right or wrong (and I believe I-B has been a valuable editor), Aeon1006’s conduct as supposed-advocate was a breach of trust and highly unprofessional. In fact, Aeon1006 would be hard pressed to demonstrate that he offered any advocacy at all, especially in the context of all the harm he did in his role. Such behavior is not consistent with the core goals and values of the Association of Member’s Advocates. Aeon1006 should not have the opportunity to violate the trust of another editor again. As such, I hereby request that Aeon1006 be removed from the AMA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UCRGrad (talk • contribs)

Probably as a result of the less than salutory experience he had recently, Aeon has already resigned from the AMA...you'd be posting directly under his resignation. Several of your comments have led me to believe you're missing a fundamental point: this is not the Real World, this is not Academia, this is Wikipedia. There are no professional advocates here...just people trying to help. Throughout this process Aeon has tried to help. You may not appreciate the form his assistance took, you may not be happy with the outcome, but he was trying to help. Especially after he has recently gone out of his way to promote mediation and other, less formal methods of dispute resolution, I regard this posting as a very shabby thing indeed. --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 06:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In retrospect I was being too charitable. This post is an utter crock of shit! The "letter" to the AMA is actually a reprint of a 10 day old post which Aeon had already responded to. [[3]] This reposting of it now is nothing less than a mean-spirited attack. At this point I can only say to UCRGrad that I look forward to commenting at your next ArbCom hearing! ...and I have no doubt the wait will be short --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 07:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki-stress

It seems like whenever my wiki-stress is getting too high, Aeon shows up on my page and makes me smile. I don't even know what that was for, but it turned up at just the right time :) --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 20:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A list of phrases which should not be used to describe another editor, no matter how accurate they are:

(This is only a partial list, I'm sure others can add to it) --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 20:57, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arrogant little twit
Despicable asshole
Lying self-righteous sack of shit
Ilegitimate offspring of a diseased mongrel cur
DICK.
Pointy Haired Boss
Troll

re: Need your Help!

Steve this is Aeon I really need you help man. Check User talk:JakGd1 and User talk:Triddle adn my own Talk page. UCRGrad is now trying to disrupt the DR process! BTW I'm at wikistress 5 might need an Advocate soon becuase I'm through dealing with him. Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 22:27, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking into this immediately. אמר Steve Caruso _(desk/AMA) 22:30, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested that an Admin look into this and take action. This behaviour is not acceptable. While I can't speak for the rest of the "community" I know that my patience has worn thin. --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 22:37, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hang in there buddy! =D Remember that you can always walk away from the computer, take a nice long walk, or drink a nice cold beer. I looked into the pattern of edits and strongly agree that these actions are unacceptable and violations of WP:CIVIL, WP:STALK and a plethora of other WP policies. Quite frankly, though, I don't really see much good in blocking him. This seems like much more of an Arbcom type case. Hang in there bud, and feel free to come to me with any questions or if you need support. αChimp ^laudare 23:37, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Break Time!

I think you need this more than the tea :) (feel free to resize it, I just wanted to make a point)

THANKS! Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 23:07, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see the various Stress-o-meters slowly dropping. The prescription for using this fine, purely medicinal beverage is, repeat as needed. --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 23:28, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I thought is was down the Entire thing in one sitting. Aeon ^{Insane Ward} 23:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]