Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs in English labeled the worst ever (4th nomination)

List of songs in English labeled the worst ever

NPOV, non-encyclopedic, unweildy listcruft, lol, internet. –127.0.0.1 (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, certainly not beautiful in its current form, but it has the potential of evolving into something like Films considered the worst ever, which actually is decent article. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 09:32, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This article has been nominated several times before:
- 21 November 2005: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs that have been considered among the worst ever, result Keep
- 17 December 2005: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs in English labeled the worst ever, result Keep
  - I know, and I don't know how it got through. –127.0.0.1 (talk) 09:53, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, every statement is verifiable and notable. If it isn't remove that particular statement. - Peregrinefisher 09:59, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the above reasons... besides, it would just get created again. --Caleby 13:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Article has too great potential for unverified abuse. Already the article has an NPOV tag and eight "citation needed" tags. "Worst ever" is too subjective a criteria. Worst by who's criteria? Can I start a 'blog, complain about how I hate such-and-such-a-song, and then cite that as a source here? This category is far too prone to WP:NPOV and WP:OR abuses. This subject is inherently non-encyclopedic. An encyclopedia should not have to post a disclaimer above articles saying, "Taste and judgment are subjective." Our role is to be objective, not subjective. This article claims itself subjective twice in the first paragraph. Scorpiondollprincess 14:17, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it IS possible to make a good article out of this, and it's been kept every time it's been nominated before. Whoever said "if at first you don't succeed, try and try again" wasn't talking about AFDing articles. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:32, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this isn't an encyclopedic topic. "Worst ever" in this context is not measurable, it's just some random opinions. For a song to be labelled the worst ever, surely it should have the least number of sales, the most complaints to stations etc and not just be because someone decided that they didn't like it. MLA 15:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. This is the 4th nomination for this article, the most recent having closed just a few weeks ago - Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_songs_in_English_labeled_the_worst_ever_(3rd_nomination). The nom brings no new arguments to the table to justify such a rapid renom. There is nothing subjective here: the topic is valid and sourced to major news outlets and authorities such as Blender, BBC or VH1. The article is also very well maintained. We should not have to debate the same points over and over. --JJay 16:22, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per JJay. Revisit in 6 months if there are any significant changes. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 17:28, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong speedy keep per being kept with a strong consensus less than a month ago. If this were not a WP:SK candidate, I would still vote keep, as I did a few weeks back. -- Kicking222 18:20, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]