Talk:Bajrang Dal

Hinduism Unassessed

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

POV text in the discussion page

The text on the discussion page above is POV. I vote for Delete. doles 18:00, 2005 Mar 7 (UTC)

I am not sure about what is the policy of deletion on talk pages and whether POV text can be deleted on the talk pages. But if you can cite me relevant guidelines i will be more than happy to support your delete request as i think the above text is just patent nonsense. kaal 19:15, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I guess policy is as similar on other things - put out a request, wait for a good amount of time (5 days?) and then do what you have to do. By the way, i just have a hunch that some anonymous person is relentlessly trying to bring in POV stuff onto the article and talk page. anyways.
  - well you can nominate it for VFD. Let me know if you have a problem with the process. This article is constantly vandalized by anon users one way or the other. It simple cannot be helped. So keep an eye on it. kaal 21:31, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    - Please don't clutter VfD more than it already is. I think it's reasonable to leave the text here for a week, and if noone has objected, delete it. If someone has objected, we'll just determine the group consensus. Foobaz·o< 23:03, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    - Good suggestion. kaal 23:14, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Controversial

User[69.199.165.162],Pls explain your reasons for adding the POV term "controversial" to the subtitle. Bharatveer 05:15, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I think that it's ok. It is controvertial because, in reality, Stanines was executed by a lone culprit, Dara Singh, and it's disputed as to whether he is involved with BD or not.Netaji 22:08, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BD is not listed or regarded as a terrorist org by any government or international agency

'Nuff said Netaji 10:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NO, look at the BBC reference. It is a terrorist organization. Your only making this defense of animals harder for yourself. --Disinterested 06:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No it doesn't. I just read the bbc reference and the word terrorist is not mentioned anywhere. Try this sort of crazy jingiost propaganda into the article and it will be reported.Netaji 07:47, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]