Jump to content

Wikipedia:Times that 100 Wikipedians supported something

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Buchanan-Hermit (talk | contribs) at 14:57, 2 August 2006 (update Phaedriel RfA). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Shortcut

This is a list of times when at least 100 Wikipedians (ideally excluding sock puppets) actually explicitly voted in support of something.

It is to be noted that 100 supports is no longer as rare as in the past, and therefore WP:200 (Times that 200 Wikipedians voted support for something) now exists.

Arbitration Committee Elections

July 2004 election

  1. Jwrosenzweig - 107
  2. Raul654 - 100

December 2004 election

  1. Theresa Knott - 265
  2. Raul654 - 216
  3. Ambi - 203
  4. Sannse - 187
  5. Neutrality - 171
  6. David Gerard - 166
  7. Grunt - 162
  8. Fennec - 161
  9. Mirv - 159
  10. Cecropia - 159
  11. James F. - 155
  12. Ed Poor - 144
  13. Hephaestos - 140
  14. Charles Matthews - 132
  15. 172 - 124
  16. The Cunctator - 124
  17. Dante Alighieri - 101

January 2006 election

  1. Mindspillage - 299
  2. Charles Matthews - 253
  3. Fred Bauder - 251
  4. Filiocht - 226
  5. Jayjg - 226
  6. SimonP - 187
  7. James F. - 181
  8. Dmcdevit - 177
  9. Ilyanep - 153 (not appointed)
  10. Merovingian - 153 (not appointed)
  11. Dbiv - 152 (not appointed)
  12. Morven - 143
  13. Kelly Martin - 133 (withdrew)
  14. Jpgordon - 128 (not appointed)
  15. Kim Bruning - 128 (not appointed)
  16. Improv - 125 (not appointed)
  17. Sam Korn - 124
  18. Nandesuka - 104 (not appointed)
  19. Mackensen - 103
  20. Redwolf24 - 100 (withdrew)
    • Also, 13 candidates got over 100 votes to oppose them, of whom six got over 150. One candidate had the dubious honor of having over 100 supports and over 100 opposes.

Requests for adminship:

  1. Phaedriel (2nd) - 247 in support (in progress)
  2. Can't sleep, clown will eat me (3rd) - 246 in support
  3. BD2412 - 183 in unanimous support
  4. AmiDaniel - 169 in support
  5. Blnguyen - 160 in support
  6. Lord Voldemort (3rd) 156 in support
  7. Xoloz - 144 in support
  8. Rob Church (4th) - 142 in support (vote failed, consensus not reached)
  9. Bookofjude - 141 in support
  10. Misza13 - 132 in support
  11. JoshuaZ - 130 in support
  12. William M. Connolley (2nd) - 129 in support
  13. Tawker (2nd) - 129 in support
  14. Rune.welsh - 128 in unanimous support
  15. Encephalon - 125 in support
  16. Lightdarkness - 124 in support
  17. Joturner (2nd) - 123 in support (withdrawn)
  18. Pilotguy - 120 in support
  19. Can't sleep, clown will eat me (1st) - 117 in support (vote failed, consensus not reached)
  20. Samir (The Scope) - 114 in support
  21. Humus sapiens 114 in support
  22. Proto (2nd) - 113 in support
  23. Func - 112 in unanimous support
  24. Srikeit (2nd) - 112 in support
  25. Kylu - 111 in support
  26. CBDunkerson - 111 in support
  27. Ta bu shi da yu (3rd) - 111 in support
  28. Interiot - 110 in unanimous support
  29. Aaron Brenneman (2nd) - 110 in support
  30. Tangotango - 109 in unanimous support
  31. Bishonen - 109 in support
  32. Lar - 109 in support
  33. Gator1 (2nd) - 108 in support (no oppose, one neutral)
  34. Cyde - 106 in support
  35. Bucketsofg - 105 in support
  36. Redvers - 105 in support
  37. Grandmasterka - 105 in support
  38. Yanksox - 104 in support
  39. Where (2nd) - 103 in unanimous support
  40. JzG - 102 in support
  41. Jaranda (7th) - 101 in support
  42. MarkGallagher (2nd) - 100 in unanimous support

Requests for bureaucratship:

  1. Essjay - 143 in support
  2. Linuxbeak (2nd) - 120 in support

Regarding policy:

Criteria for Speedy Deletion Proposal

  1. Unremarkable people - 120 to implement
  2. Attack pages - 110 to implement

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/United States Congress

Requests for rollback privileges poll

  • Double listing - 215 are supporting and 107 are opposing (in progress).

Semi-protection policy straw poll

  • 103 voted in favor of the policy.

Three revert rule enforcement

  • 159 voted to implement the enforcement.

Userbox debate

  1. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Kelly Martin/Original - 127 to endorse the view that Kelly Martin abused her sysop powers
  2. Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/userbox templates concerning beliefs and convictions - 185 to keep
  3. Wikipedia:Userbox policy poll - A double listing, 163 in favor and 102 against
  4. Wikipedia:May Userbox policy poll - 105 in favor of moving userboxes to a userbox namespace, as proposed by User:TheTrueSora

Wikipedia:Delete unused username after 90 days

  • 239 voting in favor of the proposed policy (250 counting conditional votes in favor) (in progress).

Other:

Jordanhill commemoration

  • 112 people have voted "support" to make some sort of commemorative effort in the Jordanhill railway station, it being the location described in the 1,000,000th Wikipedia article.

Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy

  • 202 Wikipedians supported the inclusion of the images of cartoons in the article

WikiProject Usability/Main Page

  • A double listing, 687 support changing the main page and 213 oppose.

AFD Philip Sandifer

  • 111 votes to delete.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Times_that_100_Wikipedians_supported_something&oldid=67247401"