User talk:YourCousin
UNBLOCK APPEAL
"
YourCousin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I feel that I have been wrongfully pursued, blocked and with full purpose by User:Chairboy who has even extended the block so that I am not able to vote in an RFA concerning User:Ryulong that ends on August 10th. My vote is being silenced and thwarted. The BOGUS block has been extended by User:Chairboy who happens to be the #2 supporter on the SUPPORT side of the vote. These Wiki-Syndicates are making life miserable for many genuine editors. I appeal to you to revert these bullies and undo my block. I have been attacked repeatedly and I feel that if unblocked, I will be able to fully display that I am an honest and thorough editor. The block was put in place initially because I reverted the work of User:ChicosBailBonds who had placed a non-sourced phoney quote regarding INCEST on the Jeremy Clarkson article. The false INCEST quote has now been removed by other editors and I feel that this exculpates me as a vandal as it is the edit that I have been punished for. It's all in the history. I am not a vandal and I am certainly not a WikiStalker. Thanks for your consideration.
Decline reason:
Well I voted on the oppose side to that RFA, though your activity has certainly made me consider changing to support. No your block evasion and continued personal attacks show no sign of any good fairth on your part.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
"
Pgk, I'm very sorry that you feel that way. I feel like I have had the tables turned on me in a major way. After the conflict with the troublesome edit subsided Ryulong DID wikistalk and harrass me. Some of his comments were made to IP# pages and I cannot directly refer you to any of them really, but you CAN see my responses on Ryulong's talk page. I was cordial with him and he reverted my edit, I tried to open a topic on the Jeremy Clarkson discussion page and he deleted it seven times so that the EDIT in question could not be discussed. This is far from admin material. I'd rather not do block evasion anymore. I have already abandoned the 'war' and I am ready to be a productive editor. Part of the rage that fueled this war was to have a block extended by a week, so that I would miss the end of the vote. Please don't vote SUPPORT for a bully just to get at me, it makes no sense. You only have to look at the histories of HIS talk page, The Jeremy Clarkson article and it's talk page history to see that he will only make life miserable for NEWBIES and people that hold a different opinion to him.
Finally, I respectfully ask that you reconsider my appeal for unblockage. As I have expressed, I would rather cease the block evasion scheme. I am convinced that the #2 supporter extended a one week block fully knowing that it would cause me to miss the end vote. This is crooked. This has only fueled the flames of this fiasco. Thanks again for your consideration.
- Since I'm the guy who extended the block, I assume you're talking about me. Until a few days ago, I didn't know Ryulong from Adam, so there's no "conspiracy of buddies" that's "keeping you down". I became aware of your disruption and edit warring from the RfA, and acted appropriately. If you feel I have not used my administrative powers appropriately or suspect that I'm somehow involved in a concerted effort to oppress you, I encourage you to use the WP:RFC procedures to request community comment on my actions. The edit warring, multiple block evasion, 30+ IPs worth of spamming and more that you embarked on probably deserves much more than a 2 week ban, but it's up to admin discretion. Personally, I'm guessing you'll cool down by the end of the 2 weeks, but if not, there's always extensions. I understand that you're upset by Ryulong, and you have communicated that. The methods you have been using for the past few days are disruptive and completely unacceptable to the running of the project, and I suggest you consider the plan I laid out for your consideration before you blanked this page(here), it's your best bet at coming back in a timely manner. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 00:33, 7 August 2006 (UTC)