Jump to content

Talk:R v Marshall; R v Bernard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CanadianCaesar (talk | contribs) at 03:41, 8 August 2006 ({{NorthAmNative}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:CanLaw

WikiProject iconIndigenous peoples of North America Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

So was this specifically a section 35 case? CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 05:40, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Only indirectly. It's about the interpretation of treaty rights and aboriginal title both of which are constitutionally protected under 35. -PullUpYourSocks 15:03, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]