Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Talmud/archive1
The Talmud article is very detailed, unbiased (which is unusual for such a controversial topic), and referenced with legitimate historical sources. After reading it, I decided that it is front-page material. --GoOdCoNtEnT 06:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Support - per nom - --GoOdCoNtEnT 06:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Object Very well done, except there are no inline citations (footnotes) (see req. 2c "....complemented where appropriate by inline citations...". There is also at least one external jump that needs fixed. Let me know if this gets fixed.Rlevse 10:04, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Goodcontent's fourth nomination in a few days, but s/he hasn't acted on suggestions on first nom yet. Sandy 12:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)