Jump to content

Christian right

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by C56C (talk | contribs) at 21:33, 8 August 2006 (→Claims of the Second Coming of Christ: add). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Part of a series on
Christianity
Principal symbol of Christianity
Theology
Nicene
Restorationist
Related topics

The Christian right is a term collectively referring to a spectrum of right-wing Christian political and social movements and organizations characterized by their strong support of social values they deem traditional in western countries. Furthermore, many Christian Right organisations from the Anglosphere use discourse, tactics and strategies from the United States Christian Right in their own contexts, leading their feminist, gay and social liberal opponents to foster their own global networking in retaliation. The terms Christian Right and Religious Right are sometimes used interchangeably, although this is problematic.

Terminology

The term Christian Right has been criticized as pejorative by leaders of conservative Christian groups, along with phrases such as theocrat and religious extremist. Some writers characterize these terms as representing Christianophobia, while some writers such as American journalist Kevin Phillips, feel the terms accurately describe the movement. The tendency of some critics of the Christian Right to use the terms Christian fundamentalist or evangelical as if these terms were equivalent is seen as problematic by a wide range of commentators. Others have suggested that "Christian right" may be preferable to "Christian Right," insofar as the latter implies a higher degree of unity than the movement actually displays.

At the same time, fundamentalists across several religions often share with the Christian Right certain positions on specific issues such as women's and gay rights, separation of religion and government, and opposition to changing moral standards. So even though many leaders of the Christian Right are outspoken critics of radical Islam, conservative Christians, Muslim social conservatives, and Orthodox Jews sometimes cooperate in national and international projects, especially through the World Congress of Families and United Nations NGO gatherings.

The term is complicated by the appropriation of "Christian" by members of the evangelical-doctrine churches for their particular brand of Christianity.

Used in another sense, "Christian Right" may describe a more benign association of individuals from a wide variety of theological beliefs, ranging from moderately traditional movements within Lutheranism and Catholicism to theologically more conservative movements such as Evangelicalism, Pentecostalism and Fundamentalist Christianity.

History

Jerome Himmelstein writes that:

"The term New Religious Right refers to a set of organizations that emerged in the late 1970s, the Moral Majority (later renamed the Liberty Federation), the Religious Roundtable, and the Christian Voice; their leaders, including Robert Grant, Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, and Ed McAteer; and the movement that these leaders and organizations fostered. Though this movement made a broad, religiously based conservative appeal, its deepest roots and most lasting impact were among white evangelicals and fundamentalist Christians (p. 97)."

The beginnings of "The Christian Right" as a nascent political movement began when evangelicals began organizing against a series of Supreme Court decisions, notably Roe v. Wade and also engaged in local battles over pornography, obscenity, taxation of private Christian schools, school prayer, textbook contents (concerning evolution), homosexuality and abortion.

As a modern political force, the Christian Right began in 1974 when Dr. Robert Grant founded American Christian Cause to advocate Christian moral teachings in Southern California. Concerned that Christians overwhelmingly voted in favor of President Jimmy Carter in 1976, Grant founded Christian Voice to mobilize Christian voters in favor of candidates who share their values. Grant involved national conservative leaders including Gary Jarmin, Howard Phillips, Terry Dolan, and Richard Viguerie in his movement and made national headlines when Christian Voice-backed candidates including Ronald Reagan, Steve Symms, Dan Quayle, and John East defeated entrenched incumbents in the 1978 and 1980 elections.. After Grant ousted Phillips, Dolan, and Viguerie several years later, the trio went on to recruit Jerry Falwell to build a new Christian Right organization, the Moral Majority. Grant's movement was said to have played a significant role in the election of President Ronald Reagan in 1980 and dozens of imitators were founded including Concerned Women for America, American Coalition for Traditional Values, and the Christian Coalition.

Christian Right movements: Outside the United States

Beyond the United States, other western nations have their own Christian Right movements. A brief summary and evaluation of those movements follow.

Australia

In Australia, the Christian Right has had mixed fortunes. In the case of the anti-abortion movement, there has been considerable fragmentation between the Federation of Right to Life Associations and Right to Life Australia. The latter favours direct action tactics, and has tended to alienate public opinion.

In New South Wales, Reverend Fred Nile and his Christian Democratic Party have occupied two to three Member of the Legislative Council (upper house) seats in the New South Wales State Parliament. Nile has been conspicuously unsuccessful in his efforts against the popular Sydney Lesbian and Gay Mardi Gras, and lesbian/gay rights legislation in general, as well as women's reproductive choice.

Similarly, his former vehicle, the South Australia-based Festival of Light has been ebbing in recent years. In that state, the Family First political party has been elected at the state and federal upper house levels. Victoria used to be the headquarters of the National Civic Council, a conservative Catholic organisation that still produces News Weekly, a conservative Catholic news publication that opposes free market capitalism as well as reproductive choice, voluntary euthanasia and lesbian/gay rights.

For a decade, this movement delayed the introduction of medical abortion in Australia (1996-2005). As time went on, all Australian states and territories either partially or fully decriminalised abortion access, and eventually, a unified multipartisan pro-choice movement insured passage of legislation that repealed obstacles within the federal Therapeutic Goods Act.

At present, the Howard administration has banned same-sex marriage and has threatened to legislate against proposed civil unions for lesbians and gay men at the federal level, as it had previously done against euthanasia law reform after the Northern Territory parliament carried it out in 1995. Euthanasia marks a particular point of conflict. In 2005, the Howard administration passed an anti-euthanasia Criminal Code Amendment (Suicide Related Offences) Act, which made it illegal to counsel people to commit suicide. However, the Howard administration is now the only Coalition (Liberal Party of Australia/National Party of Australia)-governed jurisdiction anywhere in the country, as the Australian Labor Party federal opposition controls all the state and territory governments.

New Zealand

The situation in neighbouring New Zealand is different: Abortion in New Zealand has long ceased to be an issue of public debate, with widespread abortion access. It introduced medical abortion in 2001, four years before its neighbour. Gay rights in New Zealand are advancing steadily. In 2005, Parliament legislated for civil unions in New Zealand, which also meant substantive legal rights and responsibilities opened up for lesbians and gay men under the related Relationships (Statutory References) Act. Despite the best efforts of opponents like Brian Tamaki, his Destiny Church and others, civil unions are now accepted as a fait accompli. While prostitution in New Zealand is less popular, and law reform was passed by a narrower margin, most forms of sex work in that country have been decriminalised since 2003. At present, the 48th New Zealand Parliament are about to debate a Green Party of New Zealand sponsored bill to ban parental corporal punishment of children.

Canada

Canada has had a Charter of Rights and Freedoms, an open-ended written constitution, since it was repatriated in 1982. Resultantly, feminist and lesbian/gay law reform groups have been able to secure considerable advances such as Morgentaler versus Canada in 1988, which completely decriminalised abortion in that country, as well as a string of provincial supreme court same-sex marriage victories that led the federal Parliament to introduce federal legislation to enable it in 2005. Despite the recent victory of Stephen Harper's Conservative Party of Canada at last year's federal election, the latter is currently a minority government. Canada has an antifeminist group (REAL Women of Canada) and anti-abortionists within Campaign Life Coalition, and political parties like the Christian Heritage Party of Canada and Family Coalition Party in Ontario, as well as Focus on the Family Canada, a satellite of the US-based multinational Focus on the Family, based in Colorado Springs.

None of these organisations have been able to make any inroad against Canada's feminist or lesbian gay rights movement. Paradoxically, though, censorship policy has been a continued point of contention between Canada's lesbian, gay and arts communities and federal Customs.

United Kingdom

The United Kingdom has also had an active Christian Right movement, whose fortunes peaked during the eighties, under the Conservative Party administration of Margaret Thatcher, a social conservative. However, Mary Whitehouse and her National Viewers and Listeners Association (now Mediawatch-uk) were the only political beneficiaries of tighter censorship legislation and policy during the eighties. Temporarily, the Thatcher administration passed Section 28 of the Local Government Act 1988, which made it theoretically illegal to provide inclusive educational services or social services to lesbians and gay men.

During the nineties, John Major pursued a softer stance, and Edwina Currie, a libertarian Conservative MP, produced a private members bill to reduce the gay male age of consent from twenty-one to sixteen. However, the British Parliament accepted eighteen as a compromise age of consent. In 2001, full age of consent equality prevailed. Since 1997, Tony Blair has been Prime Minister, and fully supportive of lesbian/gay rights. Under his Labour Party government, Clause 28 was repealed, the gay male age of consent was equalised at sixteen (2001), civil partnership legislation (civil unions) were introduced, and gay adoption reform passed after several libertarian Conservative MPs crossed the floor to support the measure.

Despite occasional attempts to reduce time limits for abortion access, British anti-abortion groups have been unsuccessfully at limiting women's abortion access, due to that country's long-established and vigilant pro-choice movement.

Britain, Canada and New Zealand have all faced repeated attempts to introduce voluntary euthanasia legislation, or decriminalise voluntary euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide through the courts, in the case of Canada. However, to date, none of these reform efforts have passed the select committee stage in any national, federal or provincial parliament. For example, a euthanasia law reform bill has just been postponed in the United Kingdom's House of Lords, after a massive anti-euthanasia/pro-care rally in London.

Issues

Positions labeled "Christian Right" (although sometimes held by only a minority of those commonly considered "Christian Right") include:

  • Issues of sexuality and reproduction:
    • Opposition both to same-sex marriage laws and to other measures that promote what groups such as the Focus on the Family and Traditional Values Coalition term as special rights for homosexuals. [1]. (Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell brought controversy when they attributed the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks to God's wrath against "abortionists, pagans, feminists, gays and lesbians". [2] Other opinion leaders of the Christian Right contested the remarks as extreme and insensitive; Robertson and Falwell later revised their statements.)
    • An emphasis on the value of the nuclear family in raising children
    • Opposition to sexual practices diverging from heterosexual relations within the context of monogamous marriage
    • Opposition to divorce (more widely as social disapproval rather than calls for legal restrictions)
    • Neutral to opposing attitudes towards social policies designed to facilitate women working outside the home.
    • The Pro-Life movement, which generally advocates:
      • Stronger regulation or prohibition of abortion
      • Opposition to euthanasia
      • Regulation and restriction of certain applications of biotechnology; in particular, both therapeutic and reproductive human cloning and stem cell research that involves the destruction of human embryos. See also bioethics.
      • Opposition to the death penalty (although not all of the Pro-Life movement shares this emphasis)
    • Regulation and restriction of the publication and public exhibition of media with sexual content, both pornography and erotica.
    • Opposition to sex education classes in public schools. A spectrum of views exist, from advocation of no sex education in public schools to advocation of abstinence only to strong advocation of abstinence in concert with other sex-related information.
  • Issues of the nature and degree of separation of church and state:
    • Support for the presence of religion in the public sphere and the official activities thereof, often supported by the claim that the United States was "founded by Christians as a Christian Nation"
    • Promotion of conservative to literalist interpretations of the Bible as the basis for moral values, and enforcing such values by legislation
    • Reducing restrictions on government funding for religious charities and schools. However, some politically conservative churches refuse government funding because of their restrictions regarding acceptance of homosexuality and other issues; others endorse President Bush's "faith-based initiatives" and accept funds.
    • Educational issues:
      • Support for prayer in school
      • Support for homeschooling, and private schooling, generally as an alternative to secular education rather than for Libertarian reasons. This manifests itself as support for school vouchers.
      • Opposition to teaching aspects science subverting religious or political doctrine, including:
      • In New Zealand, Canada and the United Kingdom, Christian Right organisations have opposed banning parental corporal punishment of children, although all three countries have banned the use of corporal punishment within schools.
    • Active private and religious involvement in charitable works (parachurch organization) such as disaster relief, medical care, adoption, help for women with problem pregnancies, development in Third World countries, etc., with accompanying opposition to building government programs and bureaucracies to accomplish the same objectives.
    • Opposition to Wicca and other Neopagan faiths receiving equal recognition and freedom of religious expression
  • Opposition to "judicial activism" by federal judges giving decisions perceived as liberal in cases affecting the above issues.
  • Strong support for President George W. Bush and a belief that he was chosen by God, with a mandate to lead America. In Canada, Australia and New Zealand, their respective Christian Right movements support Stephen Harper, John Howard and Don Brash, although the latter was arguably prevented from wining the last New Zealand General Election in 2005 due to badly-timed Exclusive Brethren interference which may have cost urban votes. However, in the early part of his second term some have withdrawn their support for the President over concerns of the growth of the federal government and proposed amnesty for illegal aliens. In the United Kingdom, David Cameron and his Conservative Party Opposition seem to be similarly distancing themselves from their fundamentalist and evangelical voting electoral interest constituencies.
  • Certain middle-eastern foreign policy positions (see foreign policy below)

Racism, multiculturalism, Apartheid and Indigenous rights

It is difficult to pinpoint the issue of race among the Christian Right. There are a sizable amount of non-white members of this faction. However, they tend to have universal opposition to Affirmative Action, in belief that it is reverse discrimination. Additionally, many midwestern Holiness and Pentecostal churches were founded by abolitionists and largely opposed segregation. Groups such as the Promise Keepers, which are allied with the Christian Right, encourage participation by men of all races in their activities, and have encouraged discussions of race and racism.

In Australia, Fred Nile has supported Aboriginal Land Rights and reconciliation. He has also strongly opposed Pauline Hanson and her racist, anti-immigration One Nation movement. In New Zealand, Brian Tamaki has been the only Māori Christian Right activist of note, perhaps because of New Zealand pakeha Christian Right support for the League of Rights and other far right opponents of redress measures for alienated Māori land under the Treaty of Waitangi and its associated land reclamation and monetary settlement processes. Tamaki is not supported by many pakeha fundamentalists and evangelicals for this reason, as well as perceived egocentrism. In the case of New Zealand, there was also marked opposition to the liberal anti-apartheid movements of the seventies and eighties, which sought to end sporting and diplomatic relationships with South Africa until apartheid ceased to exist in the early nineties.

U.S. foreign policy

The Cold War

The American Christian Right of the late 1970s and 1980s was strongly anti-Communist and anti-Soviet. To that end, they abhorred the policy of detente, and urged all-out support for anti-Communist governments and movements in the Third World, including apartheid South Africa and the Nicaraguan contras.

Islamic nations

Some leading evangelicals[3] and Christian conservative politicians[4] have made statements about a religious conflict between Christianity and Islam in the context of the War on Terrorism, prompting many critics and some supporters to refer to the war as a "Tenth Crusade". Defenders explain some such criticism as a misinterpretation of the term "crusade", which can be used to mean "a grand concerted effort toward some purportedly worthy cause" without any intentional overtones of holy war, although this explanation does not apply to the more detailed characterizations of the war on terror as a holy war.

However, while still supporting the Bush administration and Iraq War, many other Western Christian Right movements are divided over their response to Islam. In the United Kingdom and Canada, fundamentalist Protestant and conservative Catholic social conservatives have been pragmatic enough to reach out to Muslim anti-abortionists and opponents of same-sex marriage. UK SPUC has long had a Muslim Division, and the World Congress of Families includes Muslim and Orthodox Jewish social conservatives from Israel, the United States, Pakistan and Iran. Given worsening US-Iranian relations, it is debatable how long this initiative can survive for.

Israel

Many in the Christian Right refer to apocalyptic and other Biblical prophecy in their support of Israel, and support of Israel is often seen as a matter of biblical doctrine. Israel figures prominently in the school of interpretation of Biblical prophecy called premillennial dispensationalism, which with regard to its political implications contributes significantly to the movement sometimes called Christian Zionism.

According to Ribuffo, the Old Christian Right was generally isolationist, while Diamond notes the Christian Right since the 1950s has tended to support U.S. military intervention and covert action (see references below). After the September 11, 2001 attacks, many leaders in the Christian Right joined with neoconservatives in strongly supporting the War on Terror in Afghanistan and Operation Iraqi Freedom in Iraq. Expressing profound sympathy for Israel, some have gone so far as to advocate the "transfer" of the Palestinian population from the West Bank to another Arab nation (Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt or Saudi Arabia) as the only viable long-term solution to the ongoing turmoil in the Middle East. The Reverend Franklin Graham, in particular, has been noted for his strident views, drawing secular criticism for his harsh remarks directed at Islam and for his traveling to Baghdad to conduct an open-air Good Friday service primarily for persecuted Assyrian Christians and Chaldean Christians on April 18, 2003, nine days after the city had fallen to American troops.

Dominionism

Main article: Dominionism

Some critics of the Christian Right including Sara Diamond and Frederick Clarkson claim that the Christian Right's political agendas are a form of Dominionism influenced by Dominion Theology and Christian Reconstructionism; the latter two are related philosophies that regard the Bible as the only strictly true reference for civics, government, scientific theory or any scholarly pursuit. Many in the Christian Right oppose this point of view, and no major Christian Right leader has gone on record as advocating Reconstructionism.

According to sociologist and professor of religion William Martin[5], author of With God on Our Side, however:

"It is difficult to assess the influence of Reconstructionist thought with any accuracy. Because it is so genuinely radical, most leaders of the Religious Right are careful to distance themselves from it. At the same time, it clearly holds some appeal for many of them. One undoubtedly spoke for others when he confessed, 'Though we hide their books under the bed, we read them just the same.' In addition, several key leaders have acknowledged an intellectual debt to the theonomists. Jerry Falwell and D. James Kennedy have endorsed Reconstructionist books. Rushdoony has appeared on Kennedy's television program and the 700 Club several times. Pat Robertson makes frequent use of 'dominion' language; his book, The Secret Kingdom, has often been cited for its theonomy elements; and pluralists were made uncomfortable when, during his presidential campaign, he said he 'would only bring Christians and Jews into the government,' as well as when he later wrote, 'There will never be world peace until God's house and God's people are given their rightful place of leadership at the top of the world.' And Jay Grimstead, who leads the Coalition on Revival, which brings Reconstructionists together with more mainstream evangelicals, has said, 'I don't call myself [a Reconstructionist],' but 'A lot of us are coming to realize that the Bible is God's standard of morality . . . in all points of history . . . and for all societies, Christian and non-Christian alike. . . . It so happens that Rushdoony, Bahnsen, and North understood that sooner.' He added, 'There are a lot of us floating around in Christian leadership James Kennedy is one of them-who don't go all the way with the theonomy thing, but who want to rebuild America based on the Bible.'" (Martin 1996:354)

Political groups and individuals that worry about how, and to what extent, dominionism influences the Christian Right include People for the American Way, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Interfaith Alliance, and the Freedom From Religion Foundation, Joan Bokaer[6] and Katherine Yurica [7].

Sara Diamond warns, however, that while dominionism has influenced the Christian Right, liberals too often use hyperbolic language to describe the activities and goals of the Christian Right.[8]

The term "Dominionism" - with its close affiliation with notions of theocracy - can be used pejoratively to inaccurately describes the philosophical underpinnings of some individuals who identify themselves with the Christian Right. Very few of these see the Christian Right as an eschatological political movement designed to usher in the Kingdom of God; for them, the Christian Right articulates the traditional cultural critiques of paleoconservatives in the context of a worldview informed by orthodox Christian teaching. Moreover, many policies endorsed by the Christian Right contradict Dominionist notions. For example, the avid support of school vouchers by the Christian Right could lead to greater plurality in educational institutions, rather than a monolithic education system shaped by Dominionist ideas.

Center-right electoral activism

National organizations (including the Christian Coalition and Christian Voice) and local churches have engaged in voter registration drives and get-out-the-vote efforts, targeting people likely to vote for Republican candidates and using materials that portray Republicans more favorably than Democrats. [9]

The Christian Right has also worked to promote expressly partisan Republican campaigning. For example, during the 2004 campaign, Christian Voice waged a $2.9 million Christian Voter Drive [10]. Their 6,199 Church captains collectively registered 355,562 new voters and turned out an estimated 1.2 to 1.5 million voters. [11]. The Traditional Values Coalition website highlighted a voter registration drive by the Republican National Committee, with a link to the RNC website, and added, "The Democratic National Committee is also engaged in an aggressive campaign to register homosexual, bisexual, and transgendered individuals to defeat President [George W.] Bush in the November election." [12] Individual ministers also made political comments from the pulpit.

On rare occasion, small churches ascribing themselves to the views of the Christian Right have taken overtly partisan actions, although such overtly political activities are generally considered inappropriate in most conservative Protestant churches. For example, the pastor of the East Waynesville Baptist Church in Waynesville, North Carolina "told the congregation that anyone who planned to vote for Democratic Sen. John Kerry [the Democratic presidential candidate in 2004] should either leave the church or repent". [13] The church later expelled nine members who had voted for Kerry and refused to repent. [14]

Elsewhere, other western Protestant fundamentalist movements have supported conservative state or provincial or national governments. In the case of Australia's Fred Nile, he has strongly supported current Australian federal Prime Minister John Howard and his (Liberal Party of Australia/National Party of Australia)Coalition federal government, as has South Australia's Family First party, represented at the state and federal levels.

Similarly, in Canada, REAL Women of Canada and Campaign Life Coalition vociferously supported Stephen Harper and his Conservative Party of Canada at the recent Canadian general election in late 2005. Unfortunately for Harper, his party and the aforementioned social conservatives, social liberal pressure groups were monitoring their websites and those of particular social conservative constituency candidates. As a result, Harper and the Canadian Tories only succeeded in achieving a minority government, and seem to have backed away from divisive tactics like repeal of federal same-sex marriage legislation.

In New Zealand, Destiny New Zealand and Christian Heritage New Zealand have been effusive in their support for the National Party of New Zealand, currently the largest Opposition party. As New Zealand is a unitary state, and has a single parliamentary chamber, there was little opportunity for social conservative niche parties to influence politics until the electorate voted for Mixed Member Proportional electoral reform at a referendum held in 1993.

Thus far, United Future New Zealand has been the only fundamentalist party able to take advantage of this, but has not conspicuously succeeded in preventing sex work decriminalisation or civil union laws, and suffered decimation at the New Zealand general election 2005. At that election, the Exclusive Brethren may have alienated urban voters from Don Brash and his National Party. Social conservatism does not appear to be electorally viable in modern New Zealand.

In the United Kingdom, Margaret Thatcher actively courted the conservative Christian vote throughout her tenure as Prime Minister (1979-1990). However, despite Clause 28 and stricter censorship law and policy, the Conservative Family Campaign proved to be divisive, and the Conservative Party has always had a more active socially liberal libertarian contingent than its Republican counterpart in the United States. The Conservative Family Campaign was closed down in the late nineties under John Major, and replaced with a less strident Conservative Christian Fellowship. To complicate matters, there are also left-wing evangelicals in British Protestant circles, who strongly disagree with the US Christian Right over issues like social and environmental policies, and major evangelical and anti-abortion lobby groups like CARE,SPUC and LIFE have always been careful to appear multipartisan, and not alienate social conservatives within the Labour Party and Liberal Democrat Party.

Under new Tory leader David Cameron, it appears that the British Conservatives have decided that there is no benefit in seeking social conservative constituencies if they alienate younger, gay, urban professional or female voters.

From the above, one can conclude that while other western Christian Right movements model themselves on the US Christian Right and seek closer ties with their dominant national centre-right parties, that backfired in New Zealand and perhaps Canada, and has only succeeded in Australia, and only at the federal level, at that. In Britain, the Conservative Party has backed away from actively courting evangelical and fundamentalist voters out of fear of alienating other significant electoral interest constituencies.

Contrasting viewpoints

The Christian Right, while being a fairly large movement, does not represent all evangelicals. Some who are theologically conservative are politically liberal, such as Tony Campolo and Stanley Hauerwas. The Christian Left includes some theological conservatives. Many evangelicals in both the United States and abroad are more or less politically neutral.

Apocalypse

The Christian Science Monitor reported that a "2002 survey showed that 59 percent of Americans believe that the events in the Bible book of Revelation will occur in the future."[15] In another article Mixing prophecy and politics by the Christian Science Monitor the paper reported, "Christian Zionists are growing in influence - even as they fight for policies their critics say work against peace in the Mideast. For these believers, it's all about fulfilling biblical prophecy."[16] These Christian are "an Evangelical subset whose ranks are estimated at 20 million in the US," and "have in the past two decades poured millions of dollars of donations into Israel, formed a tight alliance with the Likud and other Israeli politicians seeking an expanded 'Greater Israel'."[17]

Author Kevin Phillips of American Theocracy, "discusses what has been called radical Chritianity and it's growing involvement into government and politics. He makes the point that members of your administration have reached out to prophetic Christians who see the war in Iraq and the rise in terrorism as signs of the apocalypse."[18] He quoted George W. Bush being asked, if "the war in Iraq and the rise in terrosim are signs of the apocalypse. And, if not, why not?" President Bush replied:

Um..uh...er...(laughter from audience and Bush)...um..uh... I....the answer is...I haven't really thought of it that way (heh, heh) (crowd laughs). Here's how I think of it. Um...first, I've heard of that by the way. I..uh.. the...uh..I, I guess...um...I'm more of a practical fellow. I vowed after September 11th that I would do everything I could to protect the American people. And...uh...my attitude, of course, was affected by the attacks.[19]

Media Matters for America reported, "some members of the conservative media have seen signs of the Apocalypse in the escalated conflicts in the Middle East and Asia."[20] The people mentioned in the report are Pat Robertson, Hal Lindsey, Glenn Beck, Jerry Falwell, Janet Parshall, Joel C. Rosenberg, Kerby Anderson, Bob Newman, and Jack Van Impe. These prominent members of the Christian right have made the link between Middle East conflict and the end of the world.

On July 31, 2006 Paula Zahn Now featured "featured a segment on "whether the crisis in the Middle East is actually a prelude to the end of the world, "marking the third time in eight days that CNN has devoted airtime to those claiming that the ongoing Mideast violence signals the coming of the Apocalypse."[1] the segment featured Joel C. Rosenberg comparing apocalyptic Scripture in the Bible to modern events. Jerry Falwell was also interviewed claiming, "I believe in the premillenial, pre-tribulational coming of Christ for all of his church, and to summarize that, your first poll, do you believe Jesus coming the second time will be in the future, I would vote yes with the 59 percent and with Billy Graham and most evangelicals."

August 08, 2006 the Miami Herald reported, "The Rapture Index -- a popular evangelical Christian Web posting that calculates a global rise in natural disasters, war and inflation -- bills itself as ``a Dow Jones industrial average of end-time activity."[21] In fact, "The Rapture Index this week: 158. The spike reflects many U.S. evangelicals' view that growing conflict in the Middle East signals the start of a global struggle leading to Christ's return."[22]

Notable persons and organizations said to be members of the Christian Right

Australia

Canada

New Zealand

People

Organisations

UK

People

Organisations

USA

People

Organizations & submovements

See also

Contrast: Christian left

References

  1. ^ CNN still fixated on Apocalypse predictors. Media Matters for America. Aug 1, 2006
  • Diamond, Sara. 1995. Roads to Dominion: Right-Wing Movements and Political Power in the United States. New York: Guilford. ISBN 0898628644.
  • Green, John C., James L. Guth and Kevin Hill. 1993. “Faith and Election: The Christian Right in Congressional Campaigns 1978–1988.” The Journal of Politics 55(1), (February): 80–91.
  • Himmelstein, Jerome L. 1990. To The Right: The Transformation of American Conservatism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Marsden, George. Understanding Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism.
  • Martin, William. 1996. With God on Our Side: The Rise of the Religious Right in America, New York: Broadway Books. ISBN 0-553-06794-4.
  • Noll, Mark. 1989. Religion and American Politics: From the Colonial Period to the 1980s.
  • Noll, Mark and Rawlyk, George: Amazing Grace: Evangelicalism in Australia, Canada, Britain, Canada and the United States: Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press: 1994: ISBN 0773512144
  • Ribuffo, Leo P. 1983. The Old Christian Right: The Protestant Far Right from the Great Depression to the Cold War. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. ISBN 0877225982.
  • Wald, Kenneth. 2003. Religion and Politics in the United States.
  • Wilcox, Clyde. Onward Christian Soldiers: The Religious Right in American Politics.
  • Wills, Garry. Under God: Religion and American Politics.

Critical

Supportive


See: Christian politics (index) for articles related to this subject.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christian_right&oldid=68481502"