I usually archive by month. If you wish to revitalize an archived discussion, please copy and paste all text, formatting included, to the bottom of this page.
This user works for Asbru Ltd and has no other contributions on Wikipedia. Surely this shouldn't be allowed any more than an autobiography? JRawle (Talk) 12:34, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In my "request for a review" entry on the talk page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Asbru_Web_Content_Management) I am not exactly trying to hide that I work for Asbru so I don't understand what you wish to add with this comment. I have been honest and as far as I know I haven't broken any rules. User:Dfisher 15:36, 1 August 2006 (GMT)
If you go to the (re-deleted) talk page, the text at the bottom says it all:
Wikipedia is not an advertising service. Promotional articles about yourself, your friends, your company or products; or articles written as part of a marketing or promotional campaign, may be deleted in accordance with our deletion policies. For more information, see Wikipedia:Spam.JRawle (Talk) 14:45, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm...I think you may not have realised that the article is a specific response to concrete reasons given for deleting the Asbru Web Content Management article. I found the reasons for the deletion here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Asbru_Web_Content_Management. It said on that page that subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page and as I don't consider my comments as part of a marketing or promotional campaign, but as a response to specific points raised that was were I put them. Also on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:SOFTWARE it says that "Creating an article about software you have personally developed is strongly discouraged but not forbidden." So I still can't see that I should have broken any rules. User:Dfisher 16:29, 1 August 2006 (GMT)
Look at This
Could you read my unfinished metromix article on my sandbox on my userpage please send me a message telling me what you think and can you edit whatever you think shoud be changed Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Animereadabouter2 (talk • contribs) 23:01, 1 August 2006.
Thank you! Sango123 for teaching me how to put userboxes on my user page please read them to find out a little bit about me and now my user page will look more specify than ever YES!Animereadabouter203:12, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sango is awarded the Editor's barnstar for her efforts in removing unencyclopedic articles forom Wikipedia, in particular her service to closing AfDs.Blnguyen | rant-line02:46, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just dropping you a line
I recently incorporated some of Deckiller's userpage layout into my own userpage, and dropped by his talk page to say thanks for the inspiration. Saying as you helped him with the styling, a good deal of that thanks is yours, as well.
Thank you for keeping an eye on my talk page and reverting what you perceived to be vandalism. I read the message and while the user certainly seemed to be a bit heated, I don't believe it was vandalism. Thanks again! hoopydinkConas tá tú?23:14, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reverting User:Mblitray, I am the person to which he was referring, needless to say, despite all the attacks I've taken on this site, that was absolutely unbelievable, not to mention scary, that someone could hate me that much. Now with his second account in ten minutes. Anyways, thanks. -- pm_shef21:00, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You are accusing me of vandalism. If any material was deleted from that page, it would have been an accident. I checked the history of my edit, and compared it to the 'revert' above, and the only differences were that of grammar and context. I do not appreciate being falsely accused and would like an apology. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.82.9.13 (talk • contribs) 20:14, 6 August 2006.
Actually, my warning on your talk page was given on August 3 and refers to content removal here. My username is nowhere to be found in the recent history of Human; it seems that another admin reverted your edit. I would recommend contacting him instead and keeping a more civil tone. Thanks, Sango12320:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
instead of assuming good faith, you accused Vandalism. You don't have to look at the most recent edit of 'human' to see your tone, see the revision below the most recent. I would have no reason to speak to you if you didnt accuse me of vandalism. Who is being self-righteous here? Why won't you admit you are wrong and civilly apologize? What have you got to lose? Why must you maintain your assertion that I vandalized something? I am sure that, in the history, my 'vandalism' would be reflected. Unless an edit is offensive or pornographic, an administrator would not alter the history of a page itself. I am going to assume that you are naieve. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.82.9.12 (talk • contribs) 00:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've looked through the last 500 revisions of the article and see no objectionable edits from my account. All the edits I recall making to Human are vandalism reversions, and in case I didn't make myself clear before, I did not revert your edit to that article; someone else did. The vandalism warning you received from me was in response to content removal from your IP address involving a completely different article. I would like to know which of my edits in particular have upset you; please provide some diffs if you'd like. Right now, I don't believe I have anything to apologize for, and I'm saying that in complete honesty. Thanks, Sango12301:19, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A smile for you...
MichaelZ526 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
Hey this list is actually located in Wikisource, and there is a link for it in the article Great Lakes Storm of 1913. When I clicked the link and visited Wikisource, the list still exists, however this tag {{refdata}} was at the top of the page advising me to delete any links to the list. Just wondered what should be done in this situation. Thanks! Stubbleboy22:36, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We've got a sock puppet operating on the Shock and Awe article, you know him, Sock puppet, Publicola? Ring a bell? Here's your revert: "00:20, 5 August 2006 Sango123 (Talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by 86.29.113.26 (talk) to last version by Publicola)"
I've never seen your name in connection with the article, you were brought in to revert. Sock puppet, Publicola was out of reverts...then you fell out of the sky with an revert for him.
I'm saying to you don't ever revert and article without first becoming familiar with the content and the dialogue on the talk page.--Scribner06:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The person whom I reverted had been using multiple IP addresses to mass revert Ryulong's contributions, often back to vandalized versions of articles or removing his edits entirely and calling it "reverting vandalism" in edit summaries ([1][2][3]). 86.29.113.26 also left incivil and abusive messages on user talk pages ([4][5]). When I saw that he had begun rapidly mass reverting again on August 5, I reverted all his edits and issued a block, as I had done when he appeared with otherIPaddresses. There's a thread on WP:AN/I about it if you're interested.
His edit to Shock and awe seems to be the only one of the bunch that didn't involve directly reverting Ryulong. Of course, I didn't realize that, as he used the same edit summary for each of his reverts and I was clicking the rollback button from his contributions page. I offer my sincerest apologies for any harm my revert may have caused. Regards, Sango12315:30, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vandalism
I wasn't vandalizing pages. I was marking articles for deletion. I read the policy of Wikipedia and it said that I can mark any page for deletion and it will be deleted speedy. Please do not ban me; I was only following the rules. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Superman loves cheese (talk • contribs) 20:15, 7 August 2006.
I was referring to your edits to Muslim and Muhammad; you may want to review Wikipedia's NPOV policy. The article you're attempting to mark for deletion (Cartoon Wars Part I) will not be "deleted speedy", as it doesn't fall under any criteria for speedy deletion. Still, if you wish to properly list an article for deletion, please follow the instructions here. Finally, please sign your comments on talk page with four tildes (~~~~); it produces a link to your userpage and a timestamp. Thanks, Sango12320:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Can't any user delete anything they dont like here? Why cant I express my religious beliefs here? There is no freedom of religion on wikipedia. 20:28, 7 August 2006 (UTC)Superman loves cheese20:28, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to know if when you have time (and if you still do this sort of thing) you could design my user page. If so, please leave a message on my talk page and I can tell you what I'm looking for, and if not, thats ok too :) Cheers. SynergeticMaggot18:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well first, thank you:) The idea I had was to either make my main userpage into a few templates like yours but militant (if this can be done). Something like army or bootcamp colors. The only other things I'd request is to organize my user boxes into groups (for instance projects in one section and so forth), and also one of those nifty Barnstar drop down lists. I'll have to look for an example if you dont know what I'm talking about. I'd also like you to sign the template, saying something like "This page designed by Sango123". :) SynergeticMaggot04:13, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Do you know what order the {{test}} templates go in? Does it go "test1" then "test 2" and then "test 3" or is "test2a" supposed to go in as well? Thanks. --Thorpe | talk22:57, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking part in my RfA! Unfortunately, it ended with a final result of (62/23/7), and with only 73% support, no consensus was achieved. Nevertheless, I thank you for your enthusiasm and better luck to me next time. :)
Thank you so much for the thoughtful message my dear friend ♥
. The heart is I see your own creation and it is going into my gallery.--Dakota03:10, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Barnstar
I gave you a barnstar on your barnstar page. It came with a few errors, sorry about that! Your awards page is so confusing to edit!Enjoy!--Ed20:59, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
