User talk:T. Moitie

Hullo one and all, to my User talk page. I would greatly appreciate that anyone adding a comment to this page would use the correct format. Indent your replies - : :: :::. Please give all your posts a title and format this correctly, and it would help if you all signed your edits with ~~~~. I hope that anyone who does not follow this guideline does not mind me adding such formatting to your comments. It just keeps things nice and tidy. :)

Any pointless flaming - of which I certainly won't start or retaliate to - will be moved to your user talk page and all the subsequent discussion will happen on there. I don't hold for flaming on my talk page, and I hope that I will never need to do that.

Please note that while yes, occasionally I do forget to leave an Edit summary, I mostly always do a Dummy edit to rectify it, so please take that into consideration if you feel like yelling at me about it.

Thanks, T. Moitie 01:16, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, T. Moitie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

RelentlessRouge 01:04, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Linux project poster

I think a better way to attract contributors would be to identify people who are regular contributors, and write to them directly. That poster is a bit on the large size, and while you put a disclaimer in very small font, it does rather look like taking credit away from people who've worked very hard individually to improve those articles. Regards, Samsara (talk • contribs) 17:00, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

I still think it would be best to wait until the WikiProject has done some actual work. Focus on some articles first, and then stick the banner up once something has been achieved. As for recruitment, I stand by my original suggestion, and am willing to help find those people. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 17:16, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Fear Is the Mindkiller MYOB (software) Bonnet Bay, New South Wales CZilla Mozilla Organization XULRunner Andrew Shives Raymond Herrera Transgression (album) Mozilla Update Ján Varga Madfox Concrete (album) Document Type Declaration Access control list Boehj Annozilla Internet suite Hatefiles

Cleanup Dino Cazares Health savings account World Wide Web Consortium Merge Filterset.G Netscape Communications Corporation Software bloat Add Sources Tribalwar Byron Stroud Digital piano Wikify Nick Barker EGBU-15 Kimball Union Academy Expand BugMeNot Windows Graphics Foundation Microsoft Project

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 11:02, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Button

I was writing it as he entered the final lap, and posted as he passed the line! Wooooooooooooah, Jenson!LessHeard vanU 14:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Collaboration of the week

Hi. Not sure if you're aware, but COTW has now been merged with AID. The new page is at WP:COTW. You voted for Mud, which I've nominated at the new page, so you might like to visit it and vote under the new procedure. All the best SP-KP 21:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Re. Verifiability

Thank you for your comment. I have added back the main section you removed, as the information is available in the prospectus. Also, references are not always required and so I don't "render the articles themselves pretty useless" by not including them - the information can always be cited later on.

On a positive note, the article looks a lot neater with the info box on the right, so thanks for that. --Alex ^{talk here} 14:27, 22 August 2006 (UTC)