Talk:Katie Holmes

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Template:Featured article is only for Wikipedia:Featured articles. Template:Mainpage date

Katie Holmes received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This article has had a peer review which has now been [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Template:Namespace prefix of associated pageKatie Holmes (old)|archived]]. It may contain ideas that you can use to improve this article.

[[Category:Old requests for peer review|Template:Namespace prefix of associated pageKatie Holmes]]

After posting a request for comments to archiving this page on June 20, 2006 and hearing no objections, I created an archive today. Discussions before July 1, 2006 are archived at Talk:Katie Holmes/Archive1. PedanticallySpeaking 13:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Katie Holmes and Kristin Davis Look alike

How many people think they look alike?

The name Suri

In Saudi Arabia/Arabian gulf countries. Suri is a nickname for Sarah. It's very common to use it instead of Sarah but not a formal name. 213.251.134.44 08:41, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suri also means "pickpocket" in Japanese. -Tacubus 11:24, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why does Suri Cruise redirect to the Katie Holmes article? Granted, there's no hard evidence Suri actually exists, apart from TomKat's Scientologist friends; which means there isn't a lot of info (even for a stub) … but why redirect to Katie as opposed to, say, Tom Cruise? --Micahbrwn 06:01, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Holy shit!

Kudos to those that penned Katie's page. Not only is it detailed but you've got the references.

Katie would be proud to have obsessive fans that have high acedemic standards. - Htra0497 20:00, 14 July 2006 (AET)

As the principal author of the page, thank you very much. PedanticallySpeaking 12:23, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use images

I'm not extremely familiar with Wikipedia's fair use policy, but is it true that no fair use image is allowed on an article if a free-licensed one has been located? It's just that the fair use images on the article have recently been removed for this reason. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 21:50, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is not correct and restored those images. PedanticallySpeaking 16:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it is correct if the copyrighted image is being used for the same purpose. Thus, a copyrighted image to depict Ms. Holmes may not be used if a free image is available. But a copyrighted image of Ms. Holmes posing on the cover of Playboy (hypothetically) would be fair-use if attached to a paragraph discussing the resulting controversy. --Yamla 17:32, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SURI SIGHTINGS

How come there is nothing on the article about the Suri sightings?? Leah Remini and Jada Pinkett Smith have spotted Suri and described her. Yet nothing in the Katie Holmes or Tom Cruise articles talks about it. Lil Flip246 16:39, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because those people were paid to say they saw Suri. Suri doesn't exist. It was a faked pregnancy, and they were planning to adopt someone. The real mom had her, and changed her mind. At least that is my take on it.Casual Karma 07:30, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Suri was a failed experiment by the Church of Scientology to combine L. Ron Hubbard's sperm (kept frozen since his death) and Cruise's sperm and create a second coming of Mr. Hubbard. The kid came out armless and with a couple of extra labia; they named it "Get out of here" in Hebrew... and ate her. Now you know. Arthurian Legend 00:48, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question? Do you people get drunk before you discuss things? 67.142.130.45 02:29, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

about her missing

where did the info go where it said katie went missing for 2 weeks so much that no one could get into contact with her before announcing that her and tom were dating? that shouldnt have been deleted that continues to prove to people that scientology is a brainwashing unit

references

do you know that it is possible to use <ref>reference name="any_memo_name_choosen"</ref> to avoid doublon. it is quality article but more than 80 references is a bit reluctant (and as there are doublons I thing there are work to do...). I can help a while --Ayanoa 15:03, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What are you saying, hun?