Jump to content

User talk:Zero1328

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 70.48.32.32 (talk) at 23:17, 25 August 2006 ([[Falling Sand Game]]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

[ This is my Talk page. ]
[ Feel free to talk to me. ]
[ See my Profile here. ][ These are my contributions. ]
[ You might find me at the IRC channel, here, at around 06:00 to 12:00 (UTC) ]

Welcome! to Wikipedia!

Hello Zero1328, this is Exir Kamalabadi, and I hope that you are having fun with Wikipedia. First of all, welcome to Wikipedia! Find something that can be improved, either in content, grammar or formatting, then fix it. Don't be afraid. Be bold! If you do something wrong, there is always someone who will clean up the mess.

Here are some links that you may find helpful:

Here are also some tips that you might find useful:

Finally, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page when you need help!

Exir KamalabadiJoin Esperanza! 01:30, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy tagging

Hi, please only add speedy delete tags to articles which meet the criteria for speedy deletion. Fefnir does not. Kappa 01:01, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think it meets the criteria. It doesn't have a source for it, and it was made by the same person who made the Harpuia Article. Seems to be made up and stuff. Zero1328 01:13, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, no idea really. Just never mind it then. It's just that there isn't any source, and I've never heard of half of those things about Fefnir and Harpuia. Zero1328 01:36, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Megaman Discussion

  • About the Image talk:Mmz4.gif; I'm the one who uploaded that image, and yes, I did indeed "steal" it from Megaman-Network. It looked like Official Art, ans I could not find any other pictures for the Megaman Zero 4 article, so I used that. I did not anticipate that it would bring up a uproar such as this, and after looking at the dicussion forum on Megaman-Network, I see I've made quite a mistake. I aplogize for my hastiness in uploading articles, and I plan to apoligize to the Megaman-Network for not thinking. So go ahead and delete the picture if its causing too much issues; I guess we'll just have to wait for official box art instead.

-MegamanZero

Oh, and about merging the Harpuia, Fefnir, etc. articles; what's up with that..? I think they're at least important enough to deserve thier own pages...

-MegamanZero

About the merging of Harpuia and Fefnir articles, I think you'll find it's because there are two articles of each (not including the main list of Megaman zero characters) and the person who suggested the merger thought that having two articles was redundant. Wolf ODonnell 20:39, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please, before remove Private Servers link of the Ragnarok Online article discuss it first. Wikipedia isn't what a member think, but what a consensus of the community thinks. Thanks for your understanding. --Brazil4Linux 00:45, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom Hearts II article

If you haven't noticed already, if you look at the History for the Kingdom Hearts II article, it looks like I reverted edits made by you. Well, that's false. If you click on your name (which is red in the edit summary) it leads to an anonymous IP address, which means that I had dropped a left or right bracket somewhere.

So, I was really reverting back to your revision and deleting that of an anon.

Sorry if there was any confusion. --'Ivan 18:12, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

None at all, Ivan. In fact, I just got back from school, so I'm quite unaware of any recent happenings. Thanks for the heads up, anyway. Zero1328 05:34, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please check at Orginzation XIII talk for reply relating to Vexen, & left credits relating to Org members on KH2 page alone for now. Especially if they have evidence backing them up.Fractyl


Zero, I noticed you reverted the additions I made to the Kingdom Hearts page. I hadn't noticed until you reverted them that I was adding things for Kingdom Hearts II on the wrong page! ^^;;; Thanks for correcting my mistake, I just feel a little silly now is all. --(Godfoster 09:40, 4 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]


Zero, Regarding the ???'s I put in on the KH2 page for Piglet and Barbossa, I placed them there as placeholders because they were credited for the Japanese cast list on that page already, but not for the English. I figured it would be more noticeable if there was something that stood out to say "Hey there! I'm missing some info here!" instead of having people read EVERY name and double check to find out which ones were missing. --(Godfoster 08:32, 5 April 2006 (UTC))[reply]

  • Oh, well, that's a good idea, sorry for the confusion. It's usually a good idea to add an edit summary on anything that might be regarded as odd/different/standing out/major/etc/can'tthinkofanymoresynonyms when you put it in. - Zero1328 08:46, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Habitat

I never knew you lived in Aus. Master Vinaki 16:30 6 March 2006 (EST)

Well, I expected people to be turned away at the first sentence of my User page. Zero1328 06:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Colonel

Please see Talk:Colonel (Mega Man). I'm trying to attempt an concensus. -ZeroTalk 13:33, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

....and MegamanZero's at fault for replying. - Zero1328 12:14, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Excuse me..? When a dispute rears its mandibles on a talkpage, and I am a part of the dispute, it is up to me as a defender of included content to support my reasoning. To not respond whould be a travesty. Perhaps I could comprehend if I constructed personal attacks or the like, but I cannot refrain from contributing to discussion on talkpages, no matter how inane and nonsensical they may be. And yes, we need to solve this. Its about nigh time yon chap recieved a block for his comments. -ZeroTalk 13:31, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am feeding the troll though, and I need to understand that. His baseless arguments are not assisting any point he's attempted to convey, so I'll cease replying to him on the talkpage. He can troll about as he pleases. But I ask he just doesn't take it out on the articles. Beacuse that would make me cross. I really don't think he wants me cross. -ZeroTalk 14:12, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You answered yourself right there, when he said he is giving up on the dispute, I had accepted that it was over.. I believed nothing more was needed to be said, but he continued anyway.. which is pretty much trolling in my book. - Zero1328 05:38, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Content insertion

See Talk:Mega Man X (character)#New content article. -ZeroTalk 16:11, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know [1]. This fellow doesn't quite comprehend how this site operates. I'm currently discussing this with him on the List of Neo Arcadian boss characters talkpage. He seems to have been misled into thinking we permit unsourced statements and an abudance of fan-site material. That's somewhat dissapointing. I've taken to reverting his revisions until this is understood and I'm inclined to believe its vandalism along with his personal attacks on the talkpage. -ZeroTalk 10:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage message

Hey! Who are you? What're you doing here? Go back to reading and editing articles! - Zero1328

Oh but I want read more of your userpage. :) -ZeroTalk 10:42, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not responsible for anything that happens to you if you don't do what that says. - Zero1328 Talk? 10:52, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I R DESTROYING WOOKOPEDIA! I MUST GET BACT TO ARTICLE WRITING! :) -ZeroTalk 10:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Zero1328! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. —Xyrael / 15:53, 21 June 2006 (UTC) 15:53, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion message

Regarding the article Image:MarioClash.jpg, which you tagged for speedy deletion with the reason "redundant", I wanted you to know that I have removed the speedy deletion tag. This article does not qualify for speedy deletion because to speedily delete an image as redundant, you must specify the image which replaces it. If you still want the article to be deleted, please use the WP:IFD process. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 12:36, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry. I was kind of in a hurry to get it deleted, and was not aware that I had to supply the other image. I'll keep that in mind in the future. I put it back up for speedy. - Zero1328 Talk? 12:44, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Playstation inline rv

Duly noted. Forget the talk page, I just rewrote that whole confusing section, minus in-depth discussion of transverse paths.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.69.25.201 (talkcontribs)

Why the message?

Why did you send me a message acussing me of vandalism? Please explain. I'm basically new to Wikipedia, so I don't know how what I did could be considered vandalism. And whatever it was, sorry.

-Karasuhebi

Your additions to Organisation XIII. [2][3] - Zero1328 Talk? 08:35, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Biometals

See here: [4]. Should I move this out to mainspace...?

I also did a redesign for the uniform template being implemented in the Mega Man articles here. Comments would be welcome at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Computer_and_video_games#General_CVG_character_Template. -Randall Brackett 15:14, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That, is really.. really good. go ahead and put it in, except replace Live Metal with Biometal. - Zero1328 Talk? 06:29, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(I don't really want to intrude into your sandbox and all, so I'll wait for you to put it in before I copyedit/edit it.) - Zero1328 Talk? 06:41, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Should I make a seperate article for it or merge it into Mega Man weapons...? -Randall Brackett 22:28, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I would say make a brief overview (similar to the MMZ section) in Mega Man weapons and give more detail in it's own article or Wikibooks, such as backstory/attacks, but there isn't really much to begin with. I say put it in Mega Man weapons. - Zero1328 Talk? 05:37, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion for personality sections on Gate and Talk:Vile (Mega Man X). -Randall Brackett 00:40, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Borderline trolling?

How do you figure?? -SaturnYoshi 08:56, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your reasons are very valid, but Wikipedia has a policy of Assuming good faith and No personal attacks. You also include your personal feelings, which are irrelevant to the discussion. Wikipedia is not a forum. - Zero1328 Talk? 09:08, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which CSD criterion did you refer to here [5]? Thanks. - CrazyRussian talk/email 04:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought spam was valid criteria for speedy deletion, but I guess I was incorrect on that. - Zero1328 Talk? 04:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Megaman X armors for deletion

Hello,

I saw the proposed deletion and read your explanation. I Agree that the article is excessivly game-guidish in some points. But I believe there are informations in it that are too intresting to be deleted (It was for that reason that I recreated the article).

The article needs some changes (for example, delete de parts/abilities tables and replace for a short description of the armor abilities), but I don't think it must be deleted. I'm going to make some of these changes and hope that other users help in make the content of this article more intresting and less game-guidish.

(P.S. : I apologize for any gramatical error that I possibly made. English is not my first Language.)SpekkioBR 23:03, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's no need to apologise to me for any grammatical errors you make. Your English is quite good. My opinion is that the whole thing should go into a video game based wiki, such as WikiKnowledge (look at this,) or merged into Mega Man weapons. You decide. - Zero1328 Talk? 05:46, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to comment on the removal of the falling sand game, is it not shareware/freeware ? How would this article be viotating copyright laws when the source file has been taken and modified many times with different "mods" of it. If the original indeed was under a copyright and or/ patent of intellectual rights, wouldn't all of these sites hosting the original version and the translated versions have been taken down, more importantly the severely modified versions ; burning sand, hell sand, etc.

I am not the creator of the article nor the program(s) in question, but would like to see a valid link to information portraying the copyright patent for this program and/or a valid reason.

Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.158.167.147 (talkcontribs)

I listed the article as a copyright violation because if you look at the article, and compare it to the following links: [6], [7], and [8], the information on the article is a direct copy of these pages. It's been like this for about six months, so editing has taken place, but the resemblance is very clear. This information was made by someone and even though it's a fansite, this text was directly copied off it. It's also not clear which copied off which. I mentioned this on Falling Sand Game's talk page. - Zero1328 Talk? 05:31, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Ahh ok, thanks for clearing that. Not familiar with using wikipedia really, sorry for the format of my question taking up your page (atleast it appeared to on my side) Also apologies for even creating this as you said it was on the talk page, did not know that there was one for it. 

Thanks again and sorry for wasting your time.