User talk:Mitchazenia

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than (1) days are automatically archived to User talk:Mitchazenia/Archive5. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Re:Coincidences

Thanks, I only used Ana in the page beacause (at the time) it was the only storm to be used 5 times without a hurricane. I'll add Beryl to that too. Thanks! →Cyclone1→ 20:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it! →Cyclone1→ 20:52, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Espeacially with that retirement one. That's pretty cool. →Cyclone1→ 20:59, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very, cool! Thanks. Hold on, Let me try something with this (organization-wise) →Cyclone1→ 21:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, I don't think we should put pics of Alicia and Allison (95) becasue thats not what the article is about. It's about the two main Allisons, ya know? →Cyclone1→ 21:28, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, the article is abot the similarties of Tropical Storm Allison (89) and Tropical Storm Allison (01). It's not about the other two storms. →Cyclone1→ 22:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Emmy

It's not bad, but I doubt there's enough information out there to justify having an article for Emmy. There's simply not a lot of info for storms in that time period. Also, when searching, you should type "Hurricane Emmy", not Hurricane and Emmy. Keeping them together will limit the results to what you want. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then there most likely isn't enough enough information for an Emmy article. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. It doesn't matter of someone wants it. I know for a fact that someone wants every storm since 1950 to have an article, but some things aren't going to happen. As it is, I'd rate the Emmy article a 2, due to lack of information and poor writing. I'm sorry, but not all storms can have articles, and unless you find some website that has unseen info on the storm, Emmy probably cannot have an article. All it did was cause the plane crash and, while sad, it is not enough to justify an article for a storm with very little info. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An automated message from Werdnabot

Hi there, I tried to archive your user talk page, but it seems that you have an error in your Werdnabot directive that prevented me from correctly archiving your User talk page. Please review this error, or contact Werdna648 for assistance. Werdna bot ^(DNBF)/_T\^C 22:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]