User talk:Crazycomputers

; Archives
	March 2006 – April 2006; May 2006 – June 2006; July 2006; August 2006;

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Please do not vandalise my talk page

Why did you revert a reversion of vandalism back to the vandalism on my talk page? Angmering 20:01, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hrm, seems I fell prey to a different troll claiming to be an admin. Sorry. --Chris (talk) 20:03, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Cheers. Angmering 20:03, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

I havn't edited anything in a long time and Iv'e constenly been blocked for things I didn't do and that includes you. There is nothing I could have done because(again) I haven't been able to edit or anything else in about a year. NO I AM NOT LYING. I don't even have an inapropreite name so please, unblock me.

From 619fan1--619fan1 22:48, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two things:

I don't see any blocks in the block log for your account. If the block was against your IP address, it's possible that another user was misbehaving previously (or at the same time if you share a public address, at a university for example). Simply place the text {{unblock}} on your user talk page, along with the block message you recieve, which should include the IP address that is blocked.
Please refrain from making personal attacks as you did here. They don't help solve anything.

If you have any questions, please ask. --Chris (talk) 11:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VS icon

I have a design for a VS icon-post to my talk page if you're interested. Scienceman123 03:27, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fate

You reverted my small entry, why? It was accurate and I can provide further proof to back it up.

Derek J — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.206.178 (talk • contribs)

Sorry it seemed like original research, it was uncited and was misplaced (at the bottom of the article). I'm not sure where it would fit best though... maybe in Destiny? --Chris (talk) 15:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VS Icon

Here- it's simple, but has the "target" emphasis [1] Scienceman123 19:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, not quite what I'm shooting for (no pun intended) but it's a good start. Do you think you could create one in the SVG format? A scalable icon would be preferred. --Chris (talk) 19:03, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is this too offensive? [2] Scienceman123 00:10, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, probably. The name of VS has already been called into question. This kind of icon would probably not help matters. --Chris (talk) 00:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How about this [3]? No people in the crosshairs. Scienceman123 03:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome

Im just sick and tired of these anon users making ridiculous and useless edits! chances are they will never become constructive. WIkipedia should make everyone have to register before editing, that will definetly take care of people who just want to mess things up.Khosrow II 22:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your feelings as I am an RC patroller and deal with vandals most of the time. But please stay cool; getting riled up isn't going to make matters better at all. It's only likely to encourage them more. --Chris (talk) 22:51, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request to re-admit

Hey Chris, I respect your opinion, but would like to submit my reasoning behind posting "Wohlberg" or "Charlie Wohlberg". Charlie is an individual who undertook a truly historic mission to Germany, as being part of a group of the FIRST JEWISH HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS to visit Germany post-holocaust era. This is very significant. The event was covered by national German broadcasting companies, and marked a new effort by the German government to make amends with the Jewish Community. The German Government orchestrated this mission to create connections between Jewish and German students, and in doing so, also gave diplomatic status to the visitors as representatives of American Jewry. Charlie and his colleagues were granted behind-the-scenes access to Goverment officials, and property and were in constant contact with high government officials. So, I would like to submit to you that you allow me to post up this article once again. Thanks, MntnClimbr 22:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually not the deleting admin, though I will inform the other admin of this post. Discussion can continue here or on that admin's talk. --Chris (talk) 23:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Who was the administrator who deleted it? --

MntnClimbr

I was, that article was reposted seven times already and went though 2 AFDs. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 23:07, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jaranda, I'm still very new at this whole thing, and I really wasn't sure of how to go about requesting the article's reposting - I contacted a few administrators before, and asked them what to do, but I never really got a clear response other than something like "repost" it, and then use the talk page or something.... I wasn't trying to vandalize, trust me, I'd much rather use the system properly, but I'm just not sure how... Do you think you could point me in the right direction? I'd appreciate it. MntnClimbr

Wondering if you could help....

Hey Chris,

I'm trying to figure out how to repeal the deletion of my article, and I'm not sure if Jaranda is getting my messages. Do you know how I can go about reinstating the article Wohlberg? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MntnClimbr (talk • contribs)

You may try filing for deletion review. --Chris (talk) 21:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HuddledMasses.

User:HuddledMasses is a single purpose account which seems intent on glorifying Bobby Boulders. Just look through his contribs list. --tjstrf 18:34, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]