This IP address was that of an AOL web proxy which now sends X-Forwarded-For headers to the Wikimedia Foundation. No further edits should originate from this IP address. For more information, please see Wikipedia:AOL. If you are an AOL user editing from this IP address, please email an administrator to have the problem corrected. Note that this IP address has been indefinitely blocked, so you will not be able to edit from this address.
You've added URLS to an offsite web page (http://www.ruxlds.com/) to a number of articles within the Latter Day Saint movement artices on Wikipedia. The additions appear to be commercial link-spam (ie, that you may own/operate the sites in question), which is against Wikipedia policies (see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not), which is why they have been removed.
The idea that more contrarian points of view for the LDS church is fine, however, there are probably better sites available than the one you listed, which, to be honest, is scant in information and seems incomplete. No offense is made if you are the owner/operator, but the URL it needs to be more relevant to the article at hand. Perhaps you can suggest other sites?
If we are wrong in this, my apologies - and please drop my a note on my talk page and let's figure out why this particular web site needs to be included/why it is more relevant than others listed. -Visorstuff18:32, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I added that link only because I ran across it. I have no affiliation with that website and I must have thought there was more there then appears to actually be. It was actually one of my first edits, so I'll try to be more cautious in the future.
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopaedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. - RoyBoy80004:14, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Weber, and if I'm right, you're the vandal who has been blatantly annoying me for the past n weeks. Please stop. If you are not the vandal, do not heed this message. PHS18:58, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
February 2006
i am not the vandal in question user:soccer6192
theSTART
Hey; many thanks to your continuing contributions to theSTART. Just letting you know it's okay / encouraged to add more than one sentence in an article per edit, as it makes it easier to browse through the history page of that article. If you're making many edits within a small period of time, consider combining them into one single edit. Thanks! ~ PseudoSudo08:04, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. 04:11, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -- xaosfluxTalk/CVU03:18, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
March 4, 2006
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Monkeyman(talk)20:07, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 20:52, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vandalism
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Moeε01:43, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. ˉˉanetode╞┬╡ 04:00, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Tehachapi, California was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot207:32, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with the page Left Behind: The Kids on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Brendenhull22:28, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Elfen Lied was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot219:53, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Care Bears was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot220:10, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I mean no offense, but you are the retarded user around here. So please stop, and leave the Bears alone if you do not wish to contribute. Sometime this weekend, this article will be up for peer review, so if you want to make it better, please do so. Thank you. --Slgrandson22:26, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked (May 19)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.
It might not have been your intent, but you recently removed content from Corcoran, California. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. NetK03:56, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Ghost Dance was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot200:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Spork. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimptalk20:27, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to List of Kingdom Hearts terms, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Paleorthid22:09, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Dysentery was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot201:52, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Recently, you have continuously modified the Jane Skinner entry to include information on supposed children between herself and Shepard Smith, but with no information to back this up. For the information relating to her having two children, this has been shown true in that she regularly references to them during Skinnerville on Studio B. Please, stop reverting this edit unless you have a reference to show this to be a true fact. | Chris00:53, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Jane Skinner, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. LaMenta305:28, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Jane Skinner was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot205:31, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Tom Wise, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimptalk06:27, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -Loren07:08, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --—Khoikhoi08:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with the page Unhalfbricking on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Mike Straw13:31, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to GlobalGuide. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. --XyraelT13:42, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Buttocks, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. mboverload@23:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Anus, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. mboverload@23:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. RoyA.A. 18:16, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It might not have been your intent, but you recently removed content from Ira Losco. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Luna Santin07:53, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with the page Hornby's Storm-petrel on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TheJCTalkContributions09:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with the page Haagespostoa on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Peripitus(Talk)10:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Kandi (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot08:48, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with the page Grenen on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. —Whomp[T] [C]01:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Herbert Mackworth Clogstoun (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot203:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Zeigarnik effect (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot400:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Ned Buntline (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot202:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Heliophorus sena (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot06:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
july 7 2006 vandalism
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Macaroni_and_cheese, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Archer319:02, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Lachenaie, Quebec, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. hoopydinkConas tá tú?08:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to EarthCraft House, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. hoopydinkConas tá tú?09:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Jascha Horenstein, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. UlTiMuS - ( T | C ) 09:14, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to House of Tan Yeok Nee, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. hoopydinkConas tá tú?09:38, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Digital credential, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. hoopydinkConas tá tú?09:51, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Indian voting machines, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. WinHunter(talk)19:18, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Republicans for Choice. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Tachyon0105:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Don Bosco High School (Irinjalakuda), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. WinHunter(talk)10:33, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.
Monkeyman(talk) 20:07, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
