Jump to content

User talk:The Rogue Penguin/Archive3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:The Rogue Penguin

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by .:Debil:. (talk | contribs) at 06:36, 7 September 2006 (→I have a question). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archive
Archives
  1. Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello The Rogue Penguin/Archive3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 19:55, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Template:Infobox animanga/Header

The default 250px as it is now defeates the point of size parameter. Does it not? --Cat out 19:00, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Actually, it doesn't. The way the paramaters are set up currently make the size parameter the senoir parameter of the two. Should it be left blank, the image box defaults to the original. However, if {{{size|250px}} is used, it will cause an error in some templates. Should someone declare the parameter with "size = ", but not give a value, the image will not display. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 20:06, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Oh I see. Thanks then. ^_^ --Cat out 22:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Jutsu

Well, I would first ask if "Jutsu" is ever used outside of a Naruto context. WhisperToMe 22:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Code lyoko.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Code lyoko.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:05, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Welling

Watch the clip. Welling himself didn't say anything about being considered for the role, just that him and Ratner discussed it and acknowledged the scheduling conflict. His last statement was that he didn't know if he was being considered or if it was just for comparison purposes. Nevermind, I see that you were just revert in mass dose and didn't see that. My bad. Bignole 01:56, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

No problem. Corrected for it. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 01:58, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I saved the page and immediately saw that you had gone back and corrected it. My apologies. Bignole 01:59, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Superman

Ok, so what is your opinion on this "preceeded by". I started a discussion, but it seems to be between me and one other person that they lag in their response time. If you could take a look, if you haven't already, I'd appreciate another opinion. Bignole 16:19, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

I do believe I am going to need your help on this "preceeded by" section from other users (namely the last two that have posted on the TALK PAGE for the article). Not only for Superman Returns, but also for the previos Supe movies that they have edited to say that Superman Returns Follows Superman II, and that Superman Lives follows Superman IV. Bignole 06:13, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
I appreciate your help with these articles, and with the "protection" that was placed. It amazes me that these people don't understand simple definitions. I feel like I'm trying to explain something to a 5 year old. You tell what is really going on and they still stick to what they are talking about because that's all they know. Anyway, Thank again for all the help. Bignole 06:42, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm glad it went up quick, otherwise we would have had to deal with Superman II as the Preceeding film till it was up. Well, I can finally get some rest without having to worry about those children. Bignole 06:46, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Didn't you say Kitty's name was spelled Kosawlski? or however that other person was spelling it?? I thought I saw you say that, and you changed it, but now it seems as though you are going with Koslowski. How was it spelled in the credits? Bignole 01:04, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Ok, cause I didn't know if I had read you wrong and you were really saying it was Koslowski. Right now it's sitting at Koslowski, being redirected from Kowalski. What we have to do is find the ones that are resticting the correct name and put them up for deletion. Then, after they have been deleted, we can assume the proper name. Bignole 01:09, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I agree. Oh, thanks for including that trivia back in. I can kinda see where you are coming from, but to me that was just so much of a stretch that it was either an error on their part or they decided to change it. They did have Clark fly at age 15 as well, which he didn't do until around 18 or so. Bignole 01:22, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
When you get a chance I need you to revert Wah's edits to the 'sub-plot' section. He keeps inserting POV comments about whether Superman is or is not Jason's father. Right now it reads like "some people believe that..." and this is clearly POV, because you cannot interpret someone else's opinion. I do not wish to revert again because I am already at 2 reverts, while Wah (if you included his disguised revert) is now at 5. If you could help I would appreciate it. Bignole 17:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Apologies for "Wild Vine"

I'm sorry for changing the Unnamed Alien back to Wild Vine. When I first saw it I thought that its proper term was incorrect. Being a mere 10 years of age, I'm very gullable to false information. Especially information on my favorite topics. I'll try not to assume unresearched information for now on.--Sheep 21:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC)Cryptosporidium-137

Im 11 and If I were you I would leave the pages alone, Some person, I think my brother, Blanked out pages and added stupid things like new aliens and stuff like that, and I got in trouble, but if I were you I would leave the pages alone. SerpentsTail

Wording on akatsuki bijuu

Akatsuki having 7 bijuu, and Akatsuki knowing the whereabouts of all remaining jinchuuriki, are two separate pieces of speculation. It is perfectly logical to say "current info suggests speculation1 and speculation2", because both speculations are, separately, suggested by current info. It is not logical to say "current info suggests speculation1 OR speculation2", because that makes it sound as if it suggests only one of the two. Grrblt 18:22, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Using the word "and" is not in any way an indication of a statement being correct. "And" only ties two parts of a sentence together, which in this case is correct. Current info suggests speculation1, and current info suggests speculation2. As I've included the word "suggests" I've made plain that the speculations may be wrong altogether and adding an "and" does not change that. I even included "may" in speculation1. With your wording, it gives the impression that current info suggests one of two things, when in fact, it suggests both. Anyway, the entry is changed now to something that fits better so it doesn't matter anymore. Grrblt 18:33, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

User:The Wretched's edits to Naruto articles

Checking his history, I noticed that he moved all the Naruto episode titles to romanized versions of their Japanese names. Is this kosher? Danny Lilithborne 04:51, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with Naruto spoilers

Just wanted to mention I appreciate the work you're doing to tag/remove spoilers from the Naruto article. Spoilers are a killer, especially in this series, especially in a page that I hope will someday achieve FA - Meersan 19:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Superman Lives

What exactly is the problem and what do I need to look at? Bignole 15:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

OK, well, right now I'm at work so it's going to be hard for me to go through the whole thing, but the first thing I will do is put up a POV warning for the page, so signify that it's under dispute. I've "watched" the page, so I will know what changes are made after that. When I get a chance I will read through and see what needs to be done. Does the discussion page refer to the tense or to the references? When i glanced it was just the references that were under fire. Bignole 15:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Why do Superman Lives and Batman vs Superman have their own article? Shouldn't they both be lumped in as part of the process to bring Superman back to the big screen. Neither was ever made, yet they have articles as if they were made. It seems more fanbased to have separate articles for both when they could all be put to better use in one large article that details the struggle to bring Superman back. What do you think? Bignole 01:31, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Spidey

Has that character been confirmed? Do you know? Bignole 20:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Not just Rhino, but the guy that becomes Rhino. His name is now listed. Bignole 20:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
I removed it. Also, about the other thing, I changed the name, but kept the page link. I will go back and move all the "character" pages to none 'cap' titles. Bignole 20:38, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Spider-Man 3

Why do you keep reverting my changes to this article? I am linking dates to allow user preferences on dates to work. By reverting my changes, you are not allowing users who have an alternate date style to be able to use it. Not everyone wants their dates shown in the format "May 4, 2007". Please read WP:DATE. Thank you. --Tim1988 talk 09:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

It doesn't matter. No where in the article does it say that it is the Ultimate version, but the fact that you are linking EB Jr. you should link it to the correct page. That is why 'Venom' is linked to the general Venom page, and Eddie Brock Jr. is linked to the Ulimate Venom page, because that is the only place he was known as such. That doesn't imply that this is the version being used, it's simply a link. Even if they reinvent the character of Venom, and nothing from the comic carries over, you still have to link to that comic, because that is where it comes from. Bignole 21:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
But now you have a terrible gap between the title of the section and the first bullet. What's worse, a right index or a big gap between the text and the title. Bignole 17:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Now the gap is between the first and second bullet. You can't see the gap? What browser are you using, and what is your pixel size? Bignole 17:37, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Maybe it's cause I am using IE. I meant screen resolution, not pixels. My bad. What resolution do you have? Maybe it's cause your screen is smaller, but chances are it's cause of Firefox. Bignole 18:32, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism, again, by 207.69.137.11

Hey, this is User:ProfessorPaul; I was checking on the Wikipedia article on Rose State College, and I regret to report that it has been vandalized (again) by 207.69.137.11. Now, I checked 207.69.137.11's talk page; you were the last person to leave a message there--and the message there was a final warning that to please STOP vandalizing Wikipedia. Check the history in the Rose State College article; I will try and revert it. Thank you for your attention to this matter. User:ProfessorPaul 23:59, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Naruto

Why do you keep adding (video game) to the "Naruto: Clash of Ninja" articles? That is usually only done when there is something else on Wikipedia with the same name(like a manga or TV show with the same name). TJ Spyke 06:36, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry Im not sure how to change back to a certain revision(feel free to edit my user talk page to teach me if you have time). I should have used the sandbox. I was trying clean it up to make Uchiha Obito as a link in the List of Chunin, not Uchiha Clan#Uchiha Obito which looks somewhat gaudy. jeydo 18:20, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Dammit, that second data book again

Always such a thorn in my side. I'll go back and fix them again. The Splendiferous Gegiford 21:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Information

Just thought you should look at [1] for information on the identity of 24.159.183.244. Also feel free to delete this. – Pedantic79 (talk) 06:02, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Template:User AU res

I have deiced to apply the German usebox solution to prevent conflict over image. Myrtone

Keeping the screting and losing trust

Do you think that Jeremie and the others should spiull the beans on their secret if they regain the ability to trust other people? --User:Angie Y.

I don't, but I do think you should have verified that you were talking about Code Lyoko. Brainiacoutcast 15:20, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

About moving articles

Quit acting arrogant. I wouldn't have to do this if you din't make the proper article titles in the first place. Its you that has screwed every thing up. I can't use the move tab because the page that it needs to be moved to already exists. Please tell me if there is a way around this so i can quit playing your little game.--SwordKirby537 05:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Naruto Ages

The Rookie Nine are all 12, not 13, but Team Guy's members are 13. This "second databook" crap is probably between Part 1 and 2. If you look at the characters ninja files in the games, or prettymuch anywhere else, you'll see they are 12. Darklinkskywalker 22:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

3-Revert Rule

You have been cited for violating the 3-revert rule on the Superman Lives article. Do not threaten your peers for the actions you committed. I'm contacting a system administrator; they'll block you soon enough. Wumbo 04:26, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Someguy0830, you made four reverts. Do not lie. Recheck the History page; do not go into denial over an article. I'm sure some people around here are a little tired of all this. Why don't you take a break for a few days and calmly think this over? I'll be right here waiting. Wumbo 05:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, that's Superman Lives, not Superman Returns. A simple typo; however, my offer is still open. Wumbo 05:48, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Naruto

So instead you just revert it to the non-sensical way it was before? Theres a section in here about Rock Lee thats virtually nothing to do with Naruto. They don't have a close relationship.Darkwarriorblake 15:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

It wasn't finished, the sections were waiting for a write up on what he did during the first half. I did my best with the sections but its hardly the ideal article to work with. A section on personality that has aspects of his physical appearance in it, then relationships which is entirely not needed, then more personality with physical appearance and a brief overview of what hes done so far with no mention of anything from the first saga, no Zabuza, no nothing and a chunk of trivia which hurts my eyes. It needs a major overhaul.Darkwarriorblake 15:13, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

We've Got a Terrorist on Our Hands

Someguy, there is a vandal known as "AAH Vandal" with a self-proclaimed vendetta against our Code: Lyoko wikis. He destroyed Angie Y's talk page (you should really see how hostile this user is) and called her and the wiki some choice words I choose not to repeat. I know that you and KFan are at extreme odds with each other, but the threat posed by the AAH Vandal seems to be serious indeed. This might be the time to set aside our differances and cooperate. --Jeremie@theLab 02:21, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for removing that odd comment off my talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 18:02, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Chiyo

I noticed that you are very knowledgeable about the Naruto articles, so I was wondering if you think Chiyo has enough information to have her own article? I think she does, but I would want a second opinion from someone with experience. 65.175.199.104 22:23, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Really? I think she was fairly important. She was around for a little more or less than Zabuza and Haku and I see they have articles. She also seems more important to the story. Though, she's defiantly more important than Shizune or Tenten who will probably never get any more development. But, whatever. Thanks anyways. 65.175.199.104 22:35, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

English spelling reform

Regarding [2]: just what kind of 'Dragons and Dungeons,' what kind of false game of magic and superstition are you playing, whereby you 1. virtually admit to vandalism by use of the word 'seriously' and 2. decide that there are some parts of the cosmos (notably Wiki Talk pages, for some reason) which can't constitute a source for Wiki main entries? I understand that you are trying to avoid the implied incest of a main entry referring to a talk page, but how else to encapsulate a lengthy and somewhat off-centre debate which has been had there? Your case is of course weakened by the vandalism you appear to admit to, today, but it wouldn't surprise me if you now were to quote some arcane, bureaucratic Wiki game rule to support your case. After all, the convention whereby authors reveal their identities only on the Talk pages is similarly weird, unexplained and inexplicable enough already. Enough already. --Etaonsh 20:46, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

A little question...

where do you get the codes for user-boxes?--Darwin 23:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)Cryptosporidium-137

Thanks!--Darwin 00:47, 21 July 2006 (UTC)# Cryptosporidium-137

Eurekanav and Television Character Infobox

I disagreed with your cleanup of the eurekanav box, so I reverted...the original conforms to standards from nav boxes from some other shows, and I am trying to create some consensus. If you really hate it, lets talk about it. On the other hand, I like the character infobox simplifications that you have made.Transcendentalstate 20:39, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

I agree that consistency is relative, especially in Wikidom, but starting somewhere is helpful. You may not choose to claim it as a reason for a revert, but it seems quite reasonable to me. And what do you have against centering? I'll leave it alone, but with all the other things there are to do, it seems odd to fuss over centering or not. Transcendentalstate 20:49, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

That is a matter of opinion.Transcendentalstate 20:52, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Umm, ok...not certain I follow your logic, but no big deal. Thanks for the rational dialogue instead of a revert war. Have a great weekend.Transcendentalstate 21:00, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Today's FHFIF vandalism issues.

You missed one piece of vandalism. But I removed it. I personally believe the cases of vandalism are linked, seeing as the only other articles that were touched by the IPs' users were ones related to Digimon. So if any of them act up, it's worth reporting to a Wikipedia admin like Shanel immediately. --Juigi Kario (Charge! * My crusades) 05:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC)


Did you follow the link?

I realize that you don't especially feel the need to follow any standards, and granted, standards are not mandatory rules, but if you look at what is trying to be done to keep entries for television shows uniform, you can see that using the words "Arc Significance" in that order is a perfectly sensible thing to do. Arc significance is actually fairly common parlance amongst people who follow arc heavy shows, and there is no implication that the entire arc is contained in the show. I protest heartily your reversion, and once more I refer you to Wikipedia:WikiProject Television episodes. I also refer you to Veronica Mars, as the folks who have run those episode pages have done an exceptional job. Not trying to be rude at all, just suggesting that you look at what else is happening. Transcendentalstate 23:08, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

New Idea

Since you don't like "Arc Significance" and I don't like "Significance in Arc", perhaps we could find something more agreeable to both of us that might convey more information? May I nominate "Significance to Overall Storyline" or "Significance to Storyline"?Transcendentalstate 14:00, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

spelling of guy

In Japenese, the version is spelled Gai. I'm just wondering what version we should put up because I see your constant change of Gai to Guy without an explanation. Can you please tell me why? Thank you. -ScotchMB 22:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

OK thank you for your explanation, even though it seemed a little rude. =) -ScotchMB 01:07, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
It's ok, I should've read better. It's my fault and I understand. ~----

Request by KFan II

Dear esteemed sir Someguy0830, we've had our differences, and I now realize that you were right. My site is overvandalized and the articles are sometimes misleading. Now that most of our articles have been deleted, I ask you to help revert the ones vandalized and create new pages out of the ones destroyed, these pages with canonical information supported by the show. I want to team up with you to try and make a better Code: WIKI. If you agree to this compromise, I will unblock you, give you SysOp powers, and once you have helped restore the pages and such, give you a Materialized Roachster. Please accept this offer, and let us overlook our previous fights and try to make a safe, secure, non-vandalized, canonical wiki for the sake of our French cartoonists who make such good shows. KFan II 06:39, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Hulk

Why is it you can't use a fair use image on a userbox? It's fair use. Bignole

Where is the restriction that says it is only fair use "if"? Fair use is fair use so long as it's cited as such. That's like a company saying the use of their image is fair use, so long as you don't try and sell it, but when another company shows it on their site the original company says no you can't do that. If restrict it's use then it is no longer "fair use" and it becomes "restricted use", where permission is necessary for usage. There are dozens of userboxes with images that are fair use. That's why they are fair use, because you are using them in a manner that is not for profit or copyright infringement. Bignole 01:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
I gotcha covered now. This is a much better image, I think so at least. Bignole
They can complain all they want, it was created on a website that allows you to create south park-like people. Bignole 03:35, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Television

Sorry about that. I wasn't thinking and didn't realize why that bit of text was showing up in an article using the template. Turns out someone had mangled the show_name line and that caused it. --waffle iron talk 06:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Naruto naming order discussion

"Support because they should be in the Western order to avoid confusion, as the manual of style indicates. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 01:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)"

The MOS does NOT mandate that fictional characters have their orders changed. Keep in mind that the MOS is talking about real people born after the 1st year of Meiji.

Naruto is not set on Earth; it is set in an alternate universe inspired by pre-Meiji Japan. WhisperToMe 21:32, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, a lot of the series that do use Western order actually take place in modern-day Japan.

Anyway, there are a few exceptions -

Historical ordering

Modern day

  • Del Rey Manga on purpose used Japanese ordering for School Rumble to preserve puns (that takes place in modern day Japan)
  • CMX used Japanese order on many of its titles in the beginning - several without anime adaptations (those Wikipedia articles, like Kamikaze Kaito Jeanne, use Japanese order) - CMX manga articles with revised Western order editions or series with anime translations that use Western order have Western order (e.g. Gals!, which takes place in modern day Japan)

Keep in mind that the Spanish, French, German, etc. editions of Naruto use Western order, so on those Wikipedias I would ask for Western order. But the English-language Naruto manga uses Japanese order, so...

WhisperToMe 21:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, but the qualifications apply to people, right? There are no real people who live in Konoha, nor there are real people who live in Hogwarts, etc. The rules in the MOS are about real people. With fictional characters the general idea is to use what the English adaptations use, for the most part. An exception is with Sailor Moon, but all the English versions are now out of print anyway. WhisperToMe 21:40, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

I usually (but not always) like to use what the original manga edition uses, e.g. Yu-Gi-Oh! has original manga names (of the English editions) -

IMO, argument-wise, now you are "cooking with gas" :) WhisperToMe 21:43, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

By the way, the manga came out a few years before the anime did. WhisperToMe 21:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I'll agree to disagree :) WhisperToMe 21:56, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Sasuke and Sakura: Friends or Foes? (Naruto episode)

Regarding your edit about the kiss, why is it that a kiss sound is heard, and then they both freak out because an accidental kiss occurs? I just watched this episode a couple of days ago, and unless I was high, a kiss occured. It might not have been shown, but the sound and their reactions were there...--Salvax 00:44, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

I never said it was seen. I just said "it might not have been shown". You cannot post the kiss didn't occur. Just becasue you don't see it does not mean it didn't happen. It's implied...--Salvax 01:22, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Whatever english major...I'll keep changing it. There was a kiss, seen or unseen. To say that there wasn't changes the whole meaning of that moment. It occurs because there is a flashback of it!--Salvax 01:39, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
In your ultimate wisdom, could you at least mention (with your unfaultering grammar) the fact that both characters react to it? I feel that is important...--Salvax 01:47, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
WELL?--Salvax 04:27, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Looking over your talk page, I can see I'm not the only person who has had problems with you and your over inflated self image. Have a nice life, and I only hope I'll never have to deal with you again!--Salvax 04:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Handling the FHFIF character listings.

I see you've been reverting the article change of Goo Goo Gaga, Jackie Khones, and Cheese. I'm thinking sooner or later we should have at least the main characters and the Recurring Trio (as I'll call Goo, Jackie, and Cheese) have their own articles. I think we could also use a template similar to Template:KND for arrangement too. --Juigi Kario (Charge! * My crusades) 16:40, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Vandalism

Ok sorry i'll stop.Orochimaru10 05:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Creeper.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Creeper.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:57, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank You

Hey I never had the chance to say thank you for reverting all the images I contributed to the Naruto Ninjutsu page. You're a great editor; actually, you're more like a cop cleaning up vandalism and keeping the facts straight. Just wanted to say thanks. Verde830 20:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh C'mon!

Image:EP 40 Flashback.JPG

Well, the least you can do is check it out yourself. I'm sure you got your torrents from DB & yeah you are right not all time codes are the same. Verde830 03:31, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

I was wondering if you would reconsider letting me put it back up. It's factual and not an opinon, it's there and it's only a 2 second glimpse of him. Even today, fans still want to know more about him even though kishimoto has already provided us a backstory. Wikipedia was created to inform, I just want others to know about this scene. Because everybody wondered who/what was that when he flashed through the screen.

I had a question - What's been going on with the trivia lately? I understand it being weaved into the article but some have disappeared completely. Is it useless info now and days? Hit me up when you can. Verde830 03:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Guardian.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Guardian.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:05, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: User page

Yeah, I noticed, and you blanked it just before I did. You and your lightning fast edits.

And since we're now on the subject, do you know how I could "delete" my user page? I'd grown accustomed to easily finding my own contributions by looking at the red user names. Snapper2 00:58, 18 August 2006 (UTC) <---- Look: blue. Grrr.

Many thanks! Snapper2 01:32, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

LOL Image Fight

LOL - Image:lolnaruto.png

I guess you win...enjoy! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sigon (talk • contribs) .

Hey, it's Dragonball1986

Hi, I know about the IP guy that blanks his talk:page 65:68:76:87 (whatever, that's me not signed in), please remove the warnings so I can start out clean. I've read the guidelines, rules, and all, NOW... ... ... I understand. Thank you for your patience, and I REALLY, REALLY want all that junk removed. Answer me back A.S.A.P. at Dragonball1986 (talk).

Re: Issues with Cartoon Cartoon article and others

Hi! As you have already noticed, I've offered to help mediate on the problems between you and Numbuh_201. I'm going to take a few minutes to look over the articles and familiarize myself with the various sides, and also take some time to chat with the both of you and see if I can't work out some sort of agreement. In the mean time, I'd suggest cooling off from editing at least those articles and possible taking a cup of tea in hopes that we can see things more clearly. Thank you in advanced for your co-operation! —Keakealani •talk•contribs• 07:04, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay, so the main issue I'm seeing right now is the argument between the use of {{Cartoon Cartoons}} versus {{CN Origina Shows}}. Both seem to have equally valid reasonings - the CN Original Shows template covers a broader range of shows compared to the Cartoon Cartoon template, but the Cartoon Cartoon template seems to be more accurate and was the original consensus. Not being anything near an expert on the subject, I can't claim to say that one is superior to the other, so that may be something for a discussion with other editors familiar with the subject. In the mean time, you have broken 3RR once already and Numbuh 201 has come close as well. I think it might be best to leave everything as is until you can develop a consensus.
One suggestion I have would be to merge the two templates. Would it be at all possible to list all the Cartoon Network Original Shows on that template and maybe separate them by "Original Cartoon Cartoons" and "Non-Cartoon Cartoon Shows"? There are many navigation templates that have categories within them, such as Template:WP:UBS. I know it seems more complex, but it would definitely prevent such a conflict in the future. What do you think? —Keakealani •talk•contribs• 07:25, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Awesome. I'll just see what Numbuh 201 has to say about it, and we can work on merging the templates. I'm glad that this can be taken care of so nicely. Thanks so much for your help! —Keakealani •talk•contribs• 07:29, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Fantastic! It looks really great, and hopefully that will satisfy both ends. In that case, I'll go ahead and revert anything that doesn't have that template attached - I don't want you to get in trouble for 3RR accidentally.
Weren't we going to use the CN Original Shows template? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Numbuh 201 (talk • contribs) .

Someguy0830, help me...

How do I start out with a clean slate? If you teach me this, I'll NEVER VANDALIZE ever again! Or blank my talk page. Thnkz. Please help me out dude! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dragonball1986 (talk • contribs) .

Register again perhaps? Or if you don't want to do that, why not just stop vandalizing and contribute normally like most people? ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk) 18:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Just Wondering...

I realize I should have asked this sooner, but the notion to contact you about it didn't occur to me until now. Remember that image of Jeremie I had on my userpage until you told me to delete it on the grounds that it was fair-use? I'm just wondering why I can't use fair-use images on my pages. Maybe I'm just reading the terms wrong but fair-use sounds to me like something that people can use, well, fairly and freely so long as they cite a source or something. If I can't use the image, that doesn't sound like fair-use to me. Again, the jargon could be confusing me, but this sounds like a term that needs to be changed. I was just curious about why fair-use material can't be used on my userpage. Thanks for helping me. --Jeremie@theLab 23:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for that. I understand it now. --Jeremie@theLab 01:02, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Fair use image of CL symbol

I have made a vector form of this image. Should I upload this, or is the symbol itself (rather than the screenshot) also covered by copyright? ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk) 23:55, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

We have episode articles

Angie Y., iNVERTED and myself have worked hard on the episode articles and I'm happy to report that we just finished "The Key" moments ago. We are now all caught up episode-wise for the Code Lyoko seasons and we can continue this work for the third and fourth seasons as they come out. --Jeremie@theLab 16:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey, all I did was the template. Can't take credit for actually writing anything! By the way (@ someguy), why did you revert my move of List of monsters in Code Lyoko? Your revert screwed up the talk page too (it's now a redirect to Talk:Monsters (Code Lyoko). ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk) 17:43, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Unless you have something against it, I'd prefer you replied to my questions here, it keeps everything in one place. Anyway, as I said on that article's talk page, it's not actually a list. Under your judgment, Spyro the Dragon (series) should be moved to "List of Spyro games". ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk) 17:50, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
I'll post here then. Your example is an unrelated one. For a series such as the one you give, a general article relating the entire series is used under the common title. That article speaks not only of the games, but of the characters. In this case, the monster list is consistent with other similar lists (episodes, primary characters, secondary characters). The naming convention used must match with those used on other articles. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 17:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Well, the lists for episodes and characters both have a link for every episode/character. Monsters do not have their individual pages. ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk) 18:02, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Neither do secondary characters, yet we still call it a list. The monster article is a list. It lists each monster and gives a description. Were it just about monsters, it would be dedicated to the description of monsters in general, not specific ones.
There are two sections about monsters in general. Were it a "List of" article, it should not have those sections (or they should be one, very brief, section). ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk) 18:14, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
One is a section about inconsistencies, which is an important footnote when describing the monsters. Your definition of a list is too narrow. It need not be just a list. Description can be added. The focus of the article is the list.
On a different note, good job on the episode articles. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 17:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the compliment, and as for iNVERTED I consider his template worthy of including him on my list of thanks. I know I couldn't have made it myself, so he deserves as much thanks as I and Angie do. --Jeremie@theLab 20:00, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Wow, okay. You can call me Rob, by the way. ^^ ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk) 20:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Okay, no problem Rob. --Jeremie@theLab 20:48, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Foster's the Movie: Journey to The Imaginary World

Hey -- I know it's frustrating if an anon removes a WP:PROD tag without explanation, but adding it back is against the PROD policy. I'm removing the PROD, I'll leave it up to you to take it to AfD. Mangojuicetalk 16:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

in response to the "minor" edit

sorry about the misleading minor check - it's a bad habit of mine, and was not my true intent. i originally wanted to small changes but small turn to big and well...i got carried away.

i apologize, and i'll be sure to carefully take in mind the next time i edit an article.

jc215flip

My use of the clear template

I realize that it seems useless to you that I use {{clear}}, however my screen resolution is 1920 x 1600 (or 1200...one of the two) so the images cause text wrapping issues for me, and using Firefox does not help that issue. Ryūlóng 01:28, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

images::cola cao

well, to save people's time i can remove stuff i have done wrong myself. don't believe i need that image to be stored on wikipedia. your edit (replace tag) was not required.

in the future (you may) try this: "please remove that image. it violates this policy". i will do so. in addition, i am suggesting stuff to Ifd time by time myself. Bad communication=better than no communication? User:Yy-bo] 18:28, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Is there a wiki rule tat say I can't?

Please answer back Someguy User:Kabuto Yakushi

You are the third person I've talked to

Hello. I'm new here. My name is ShogoFan3000. I like Japanese things, especially Tempora cooking. I'm an official zombie hunter. I'm a BIG FAN of the movie The Blob (the 1980s remake). I strongly suggest you should watch it. I'm sitting in a very comfortable chair right now. A lot more comfortable than the cinema chairs they make you sit in for two hours. Yes, I'm very personal. I would really like to meet you. Would you talk to me and be my friend? Do you eat with chopsticks, because I can't. Would you please teach me. THE END. --ShogoFan3000 19:50, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Too bad you don't know how to eat with chopsticks. Please learn so you can teach me. Did you get the point that I am sitting in a very comfortable chair? You should too. It's easy on your back. THE END. --ShogoFan3000 19:58, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
ROFL!! (unnecessary comment) ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk) 20:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks man

Now I comprehend, though it doesn't say exactly I am NEVER allowed to redirect my user page, but I'll just constantly update my page on my own and not redirect. One thing I wanna know, what's the template for protecting my own page and pages of certain articles? Do I have your authorization? Once again, thanks. Kabuto Yakushi

Can I add a certain technique to Kabuto

I believe that Kabuto is able to use Vanishing Facial Copy Technique due to the fact that when he used the Dead Soul Technique, he stitched his own face onto one of the ANBU Black Ops he had murdered. See: proof. HE even had it used in the anime, except with no stitches showing. In the Fuuma filler arc, Kabuto's face was being used to guise Kagerō. Watch that episode too as proof. Please answer A.S.A.P. so I can add the Vanishing Facial Copy Technique onto his jutsu list. Thanks, Kabuto Yakushi (User talk:Kabuto Yakushi)

Really, how did Kabuto do this [3]? There is no such thing as Voo doo or magic in Naruto. Give me a better answer than that crap. Kabuto Yakushi (User talk:Kabuto Yakushi)
How did he surgically mold his face without even using his face? Kabuto Yakushi (User talk:Kabuto Yakushi)

Help me out, dude

See also: Tokubetsu Jonin

How do we remove the "#" out of this template without making it a main article?Kabuto Yakushi (User talk:Kabuto Yakushi)

Hey, its me!

How can I get the offfical title for the Techique "Oral Regeneration"?Kabuto Yakushi (User talk:Kabuto Yakushi)

How can I get authorization to make it official? Kabuto Yakushi (User talk:Kabuto Yakushi)

I have a question

Y do you have a problem with my images? Yours look like zombies... Kabuto Yakushi (User talk:Kabuto Yakushi)


Hey There

Hey, Someguy, I don't know if you have some personal bias against me or something, but you seem to like deleting everything I put up. I'd like you to stop being so anal and remember that these articles are not yours, they ARE public, and you seem to want your way all the time, even if you are wrong. I'd like you to consider people's requests and the content that you indescriminantly delete/revert, and remember that your way isn't always the best way. Thank You..:Debil:. 06:31, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Rogue_Penguin/Archive3&oldid=74286618"