Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schäffer the Darklord

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:48, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Schäffer the Darklord

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Multiple issues tag on top of this BLP page for six years (notability and RS). No independent reliable sourcing that I can see on the page. Majority of applied inline sources are YouTube videos. Likely socking here. Page was created by a single purpose account; by authorship over 70% of page is written by SPAs. A reasonable search finds routine band appearance mentions in local newspapers (one of these is in the NYT). I find little directly detailing by reliable source, certainly not enough to support a BLP on this subject. BusterD (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. BusterD (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. BusterD (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:25, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sulfurboy (talk) 15:38, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The East Bay Express ref only mentions the subject. The Brightest Young Things ref and The Apiary refs are interviews. The rest are either poor sources, facebook pages, or the subject's site. There's not enough to pass GNG here. --Kbabej (talk) 22:07, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:12, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.