Jump to content

Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by McMullen (talk | contribs) at 15:49, 24 January 2005 (→[[Bob Matsui]]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Each week a Collaboration of the Week will be picked using this page. This is a specific topic which either has no article or a basic stub page, the aim being to have a featured-standard article by the end of the week, from widespread cooperative editing.

Shortcut

The project aims to fill gaps in Wikipedia, to give users a focus and to give us all something to be proud of. Anyone can nominate an article and can vote for the nominated articles. Every Sunday, the votes are tallied, and the winner will be promoted for a week to potential contributors.

Collaborations
Articles
Science and technology
Miscellaneous

The next winner will be selected on Sunday, January 23, 18:00 (UTC).
Previous winners can be found at /History.
Removed nominations can be found at /Removed.

Selecting the next Collaboration of the Week

  • Voting
    • Please vote for as many of the following candidates as you like.
    • Only registered users should vote.
    • To enter your votes, simply edit the appropriate sections by just inserting a new line with "# ~~~~". This will add your username and a time stamp in a new numbered list item.
    • A vote will be taken to include a pledge that the voter will contribute to the article if it is selected.
    • Please add only support votes. Opposing votes will not affect the result, as the winner is simply the one with the most support votes (see Approval voting).
  • Tie-breakers
    • In case of a tie, voting will be extended for 24 hours. If there is still a tie, the candidate that was nominated first wins.
The path to a featured article
  • Nominations
    • New nominations can be made at any time and should be added at the end of this page. Please use the template at the bottom of this page.
    • If the page you are nominating already exists, please add {{COTW}} to the top of its talk page. This expands to:

Template:COTW

  • Considerations for nominations
    • Please only nominate articles which don't currently exist or are stubs. (Two paragraphs or less of information or fewer than 1,000 characters)
    • For non-stubs, submitting the article to pages needing attention, cleanup, peer review, or requests for expansion may be more appropriate.
    • Giving reasons as to why an article should become the COTW may assist others in casting their vote.
    • Can the wider community easily contribute to the article? Or is it something only a small number of people will know about?
  • Pruning
    • The nomination will be moved to /Removed if it has not received 5 votes after 7 days on the list, 10 votes after 14 days, 15 votes after 21 days, and so on.

Candidates for next week

Military history of the Soviet Union

Nominated December 28, 2004; needs 25 votes by February 1, 2005

Support:

  1. AndyL 01:57, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  2. KNewman 02:54, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
  3. brian0918&#153; 05:32, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  4. The KoG | Talk 19:04, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
  5. Pyromonkeykw
  6. McMullen 01:33, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  7. Ryan Anderson 22:19, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  8. Golbez 18:48, Jan 4, 2005 (UTC)
  9. Mikkalai 08:43, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  10. CunningLinguist 11:07, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  11. WizardOfTheCDrive 21:04, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  12. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 23:01, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  13. Johntex 21:02, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  14. Comrade Tassadar 23:52, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  15. AfCg 05:56, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  16. olivier 06:26, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
  17. PedanticallySpeaking 18:05, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)
  18. Lockeownzj00 00:40, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  19. Páll 01:06, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  20. Kostja 17:43, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Ah the Russian Civil War, Soviet-Polish War, Invasion of Finland, Great Patriotic War, Invastion of Hungary, Invasion of Czechoslovakia, Cold War, Invasion of Afghanistan...AndyL 01:57, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • I decided to vote for this one, but I'm afraid that it will simply end up as a compiliation of references and links to other articles. KNewman 02:54, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
    • One way to avoid the "list of links" approach would be an overall discussion of historical Soviet military strategy. See Edward Luttwak's The Grand Strategy of the Soviet Union for one example. --McMullen 01:33, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Compilation would be great as well. Soviet military strategy, if one could write it, would be great in itself. Mikkalai 08:42, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Just noticed that the History of the Soviet Union article does not mention Polish-Soviet War at all. Yep. this needs help. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 23:01, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Short, but not a stub - as we define it - at time of nomination. DAVODD 20:36, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)

Paris Peace Conference, 1919

Nominated December 29, 2004; needs 25 votes by February 2, 2005

Support:

  1. AndyL 23:18, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  2. RoboAction 05:39, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  3. brian0918&#153; 05:59, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  4. Smoddy | Talk 18:12, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  5. Trevor macinnis 03:37, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  6. KNewman 14:01, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
  7. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 22:30, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  8. Joolz 01:52, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  9. Pmeisel 16:23, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  10. CunningLinguist 09:46, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  11. Johntex 21:02, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  12. AfCg 05:56, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  13. Wombat 02:37, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)
  14. Pastinakel 22:16, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  15. Rj 22:36, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
  16. kaal 23:38, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  17. Dmcdevit 03:14, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  18. PedanticallySpeaking 18:05, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)
  19. Darwin 18:40, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  20. Páll 01:06, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • There's been a major award winning book on the conference, Paris 1919 by Margaret Macmillian but we have barely a paragraph.
  • Absolutely; needs a lot of work, but this is an important event of our recent histoy.
  • Is especially relevant with reference to the current collabortation, the League of Nations. Smoddy | Talk 18:12, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • I've added some stuff in the article and also invite you to vote for the Washington Naval Conference on the bottom of this page. KNewman 19:09, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)

Bob Matsui

Nominated January 9, 2005; needs 15 votes by January 30, 2005

Support:

  1. AllyUnion (talk) 06:17, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. CunningLinguist 11:07, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  3. WizardOfTheCDrive 21:09, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  4. J3ff 02:12, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  5. Let's do a really good bio. Neutralitytalk 14:27, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
  6. AfCg 05:56, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  7. Wonderfool 13:24, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC).
  8. Tipu 02:37, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  9. Dmcdevit 23:03, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  10. abomination 06:06, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • A kind hearted representative from California who's entry should be expanded a bit more. -- AllyUnion (talk) 06:17, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Amen. What, should I say more? --WizardOfTheCDrive 21:09, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • I also support this, he was very influential in American politics and this should be an interesting article to write. -CunningLinguist 04:52, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • It should be noted that he was interned at a Japanese camp... instead of being bitter about it, he ran for office, and eventually became a Representative for... I think it was 26 years for Sacramento. He also fought for Japanese rights, and was able to push for the bill that apologized to Japanese Americans for their internment. -- AllyUnion (talk) 08:29, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • His actual name is "Robert Matsui" but everyone referred to him as "Bob Matsui". -- AllyUnion (talk) 08:30, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • i saw some program about him a few days ago. In fact, im gonna collaborate myself on this one--Wonderfool 13:24, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC).
  • Sounds like a good man and worthy for a collaboration.--abomination 06:06, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Music history

Nominated January 9, 2005; needs 15 votes by January 30, 2005

Support:

  1. Estel (talk) 16:30, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)
  2. --Blondel 17:16, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  3. WizardOfTheCDrive 21:02, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  4. CunningLinguist 09:45, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  5. AndyL 13:31, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  6. Rj 22:36, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 22:59, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  8. Darwin 18:40, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  9. Acaides 04:14, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  10. Pmeisel 22:00, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • I was greatly shocked when I found such a stub of an article for what is one of the more greatly rich, deep and important topics that are COTW candidates. In essence, it is only a collection of links to other stubs that constitute (in essence) the History of Music in various continents. - Estel (talk) 10:26, Jan 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Music history or history of music? Neutralitytalk 14:27, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)

History of painting

Nominated January 10, 2005; needs 15 votes by January 31, 2005

Support:

  1. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 23:19, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. WizardOfTheCDrive 22:58, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  3. AndyL 13:31, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  4. Pastinakel 22:11, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  5. Polocrunch 22:56, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  6. olivier 06:26, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Rj 22:36, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
  8. Darwin 18:40, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  9. Arunram 17:13, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  10. ✏ Sverdrup 12:21, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • I am not the biggest fan of painting art, but honestly, the current *list* is pathetic - it is not even complete! Entire ancient and medieval sections are blank. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 23:19, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Fourth Generation War

Nominated January 10, 2005; needs 10 votes by January 24, 2005

Support:

  1. CunningLinguist 21:57, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. Johntex 21:02, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  3. WizardOfTheCDrive 01:04, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  4. AndyL 13:31, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  5. Polocrunch 22:57, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  6. Dhartung | Talk 08:17, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • I support this article being used because I feel it is rather obscure, could use help and relates well to current events. Here is a snippet of the current article:

"Fourth Generation War is a concept defined by William S. Lind, used to describe the decentralized nature of modern warfare. The simplest definition includes any war in which one of the major participants in not a state. Fourth Generation wars are characterized by a blurring of the lines between soldier and civilian, peace and conflict, battlefield and safety. While this term is similar to terrorism and asymmetric war, it is generally broader, and indeed includes both of these concepts. In some sense, gang violence is Fourth Generation war."

  • It appears that the article as it is says it all... Am I wrong? KNewman 22:51, Jan 10, 2005 (UTC)
    • Good point. When I originally nominated the article I felt it could be expanded and I still beleive it can be, in the regards of guerilla warfare and terrorism, but it probably does not merit enough work to be a COTW candidate. So feel free to work on it but since I nominated it and am the only person to vote for it, I would like to revoke/remove this nomination(if such a thing is possible). So whoever takes it upon themselves to moderate this page, feel free to remove this nomination. -CunningLinguist 09:42, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
    • I disagree. I think the article oversimplifies Lind's work and the place it has in conceptual military history. As it is, there are gross errors, some of which I'll try to correct immediately. But the concept is more than a glib catchphrase, and much of the collegiate-level military thinking, not only in the superpowers but elsewhere, has expanded on this work. --Dhartung | Talk 08:08, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Simply put, we can do better than that with such a simple concept--WizardOfTheCDrive 01:04, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Culture of China

Nominated January 10, 2005; needs 15 votes by January 31, 2005

Okay, I'm jumping on the "Culture of" bandwagon here, but this one is in serious need of help. For the largest country in the world, there is absolutely nothing but a list of links. The lack of this article is typical of the English Wikipedia's systemic bias against non-English speaking or non-Western cultures. There is no reason why articles like Culture of the United Kingdom, Culture of Australia, and Culture of Ireland should be so substantial while we have no article for China, one of the most historic and influential cultures ever. Come on, we can do better!

Support:

  1. Dmcdevit 23:16, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. CunningLinguist 09:50, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  3. Johntex 21:02, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  4. Jiang 08:43, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  5. Pastinakel 22:12, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  6. olivier 06:26, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Calton 03:07, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  8. Xiaopo ℑ 07:19, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  9. Lockeownzj00 00:42, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  10. Arunram 01:15, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  11. ✏ Sverdrup 12:34, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  12. Colipon+(T) 04:28, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Well, the lack of articles such as this probably has to do with the fact that there are few of us who know about Asian history etc. than about European/American history since the majority of visitors to the English Wiki are from the Western World. Nonetheless I agree with you 100% the article needs to be expanded as it is greatly important and should be interesting/fun to do. :) -CunningLinguist 09:50, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • I apologize again for my semi-satirical semi-serious suggestion of Culture of Earth. --Wonderfool 10:20, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • oldest continuous civilization in the world and the center of the eastern world...
  • This one needs it dearly. ✏ Sverdrup

Central Asia

Nominated January 13, 2005; needs 15 votes by February 3, 2005

Support:

  1. Pharos 09:26, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. AndyL 13:31, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  3. Estel (talk) 19:44, Jan 13, 2005 (UTC)
  4. Alarm 17:07, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  5. SimonP 17:51, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)
  6. Jiang 08:44, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  7. Pastinakel 22:13, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  8. olivier 06:26, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
  9. Marnevell 14:20, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  10. Tipu 02:40, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  11. Gareth Hughes 01:37, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  12. Darwin 18:40, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  13. CunningLinguist 07:41, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  14. --Circeus 17:54, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • A shame of a stub for an increasingly important region of the world. From histories of steppe nomads and the Silk Road, a massive regional irrigation system (and equally massive attendant environmental problems), issues of dictatorship and (possibly) democracy, a scrambling for fossil fuel development, and a variety of Turkic and Indo-European cultures. All around a most interesting, absorbing and important topic.--Pharos 09:26, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • I'm astonished as well - an overview of the vast part of the vastest continent surely has to be more important that the culture of any single country, no matter how great in itself it once may have been - Estel (talk) 19:44, Jan 13, 2005 (UTC)

History of science

Nominated January 18, 2005; needs 10 votes by February 1, 2005

Support:

  1. Fredrik | talk 10:28, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. Pharos 01:18, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  3. PedanticallySpeaking 18:05, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)
  4. CunningLinguist 07:41, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  5. RJH 22:21, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • This is currently a redirect to history of science and technology, which really should be (and in the lead section claims to be) about the academic discipline. (It should perhaps be merged with Science studies.) The "history of science and technology" article currently attempts to provide a history of science, but does a dismal job. I'm confident that even a slight collaborative effort to write this article could result in one of Wikipedia's best. The source information is abundant (even within Wikipedia), there are plenty of images to make it visually appealing, and most people can contribute. Fredrik | talk 10:28, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Beverage Can

Nominated January 18, 2005; needs 5 votes by January 25, 2005

Support:

  1. Litefantastic 17:47, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

Brazilian Navy

Nominated January 18, 2005; needs 5 votes by January 25, 2005

Support:

  1. McMullen 23:12, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. CunningLinguist 07:41, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  3. The bellman 07:30, 2005 Jan 22 (UTC)

Comments:

  • The largest navy in Latin America has no more than a stub.

Military history of the United States

Nominated January 18, 2005; needs 10 votes by February 2, 2005

I realize the States don't have quite the long history of France, for example, but boy do Americans know how pack a lot of war into very little time. We should have plenty to write about -- and I can't believe there is hardly even an article started.--Dmcdevit 23:20, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Support:

  1. Dmcdevit 23:20, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. J3ff 00:40, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  3. PedanticallySpeaking 18:05, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)
  4. Lockeownzj00 00:52, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  5. Johntex 19:30, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  6. WizardOfTheCDrive 20:24, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  7. Pmeisel 22:06, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  8. brian0918&#153; 17:46, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  9. DAVODD 20:40, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • The article is basically just a long list — J3ff 00:40, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • As the sole super power - this may be an essential article - especially for translation into other languages so that other cultures may better understand established U.S. military mores, foundations and traditions. DAVODD 20:40, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)

Human rights in Myanmar

Nominated January 19, 2005; needs 10 votes by February 2, 2005

Support:

  1. Alarm 12:00, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. PedanticallySpeaking 18:05, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)
  3. Pharos 20:20, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  4. CunningLinguist 07:41, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  5. Warofdreams 11:51, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  6. Neutralitytalk 01:49, Jan 22, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Jiang 23:07, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

Censorship of music

Nominated January 19, 2005; needs 5 votes by January 26, 2005

Support:

  1. violet/riga (t) 22:35, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. Squiquifox 16:41, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  3. CunningLinguist 07:41, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  4. WizardOfTheCDrive 20:22, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Small list of possible expansion ideas at the talk page for this huge topic. violet/riga (t) 22:35, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Political rehabilitation

Nominated January 20, 2005; needs 5 votes by January 27, 2005

Support:

  1. KNewman 02:57, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • I believe this is an important topic that should be covered in Wikipedia. It is not even mentioned on the Rehabilitation disambiguation page. KNewman 02:57, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)

Cartoon character

Nominated January 23, 2005; needs 5 votes by January 30, 2005

Support:

  1. violet/riga (t) 00:14, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

Culture of World War I

Nominated January 22, 2005; needs 5 votes by January 29, 2005

Support:

  1. 119 03:24, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. CunningLinguist 11:14, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  3. Litefantastic 14:48, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • The First World War is often cited as a monumental shift in Western culture, yet we have no article. In fact, a text search for "culture" shows no matches in World War I! 119 03:24, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
    • I've never heard it cited as such, but I think it should be. -Litefantastic 14:48, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

César Chávez

Nominated January 23, 2005; needs 5 votes by January 30, 2005

Support:

  1. Gentgeen 03:36, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. Pmeisel 03:56, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  3. CunningLinguist 11:14, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  4. Dmcdevit 17:40, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • The leader of the civil rights movement for Hispanic-Americans doesn't even get one screen of text? Shame. Gentgeen 03:36, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Significant labor leader worthy of documentation.Pmeisel 03:56, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • VERY worthy civil rights/labor leader, LOTS to write about. Very deserving of our attention. CunningLinguist 11:14, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Short, but not a stub. DAVODD 20:28, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)

Arctic

Nominated January 22, 2005; needs 5 votes by January 29, 2005

Support:

  1. KNewman 04:44, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)
  2. brian0918&#153; 17:48, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • While searching for some info on Polar stations (which I thought of nominating first), I found out that the Arctic article needs a lot of work (history of formation, discovery and exploration, climate, geology, nature, landscape, international treaties regarding the Arctic, research stations etc.). KNewman 04:44, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)
  • Short. But may not be a stub. DAVODD 20:32, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)

The Garífunas

Nominated January 23, 2005; needs 5 votes by January 30, 2005

Support:

  1. Squiquifox 18:02, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. CunningLinguist 00:59, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • From the article: "

The Garífunas are black people who live on the Northern Caribbean coast of Honduras and Guatemala. They speak their own Garífuna language. They are also known because of their unique dance style, called the Punta." -CunningLinguist 00:59, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Film industry

Nominated January 23, 2005; needs 5 votes by January 30, 2005

Support:

  1. DAVODD 20:26, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)
  2. CunningLinguist 00:59, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  3. Xezbeth 15:38, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • This multi-billion-dollar industry is currently just a redirect to film. DAVODD 20:26, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)

Learning

Nominated January 23, 2005; needs 5 votes by January 30, 2005

Support:

  1. 128.135.221.38 04:00, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • Nothing but a list.

Cultural history of war

Nominated January 24, 2005; needs 5 votes by January 31, 2005

Support:

  1. Wonderfool 10:42, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  2. CunningLinguist 12:11, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Comments:

  • This may be a huge bandwagon to jump on. --Wonderfool 10:42, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • You are an idiot Wonderfool
  • However, Cultural history of war might be interesting. Filiocht 10:44, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)
  • I wish to jump on this bandwagon! -CunningLinguist 12:11, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Cultural history of war is so much better, so i changed it. This was semi-tongue-in-cheek as a recommendation, but the tongue seems to have been taken out of the metaphorical cheek, so to speak --Wonderfool 12:16, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

To nominate an article please click on "Edit" on the right.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Collaboration_of_the_week/Archive&oldid=9619150"