Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Lyndon LaRouche 2/Proposed decision

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Grunt (talk | contribs) at 18:10, 25 January 2005 (Protection of La Rouche related articles). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

all proposed

Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.

  • Only items that receive a majority aye vote will be enacted.
  • Items that receive a majority nay vote will be formally rejected.
  • Items that do not receive a majority aye or nay vote will be open to possible amendment by any Arbitrator if he so chooses. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time.
  • Items that receive a majority abstentions will need to go through an amendment process and be re-voted on once.

Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were enacted.

On this case, [N] arbitrators is/are recused and [N] is/are inactive, so [N] votes are a majority.

Proposed temporary injunctions

Four net aye votes needed to pass (each nay vote subtracts an aye)

Template

1) {text of proposed orders}

Aye:
Nay:
Abstain:

Editing ban by participants in this matter

1) Herschelkrustofsky (contribs), Weed Harper (contribs), C Colden (contribs), IP address 64.30.208.48 (contribs), and User:Cberlet, User:Willmcw, and User:SlimVirgin are prohibited from editing articles on Template:LaRouche editing the talk pages on Template:LaRouche Talk creating new articles related to the LaRouche movement pending resolution of this matter. This includes editing by anonymous AOL accounts.

Aye:
  1. The existing articles are no count, no purpose is served by further churning Fred Bauder 15:36, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)
  2. An effective way to squish the dispute until such time as we can figure out a better way to squish the dispute. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 18:10, 2005 Jan 25 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

2) All La Rouche related articles are protected pending resolution of this matter.

Aye:
  1. An alternative Fred Bauder 15:35, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)
  2. Iff 1) doesn't pass. -- Grunt 🇪🇺 18:10, 2005 Jan 25 (UTC)
Nay:
Abstain:

Proposed principles

proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Aye:
Nay:
Abstain:

Proposed findings of fact

proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Aye:
Nay:
Abstain:

Proposed decision

Remedies

proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Aye:
Nay:
Abstain:

Enforcement

proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Aye:
Nay:
Abstain:

Discussion by Arbitrators

General

Motion to close

Four Aye votes needed to close case