Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zira

The movie itself does not have a page, so why should a page about a minor character from it? Taking up space. --Woohookitty 02:14, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Neutral - The movie does have a page, the internal link was wrong. There are also pages on other characters from the Lion King movies--nixie 02:26, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep - I linked the Lion King II page back to Zira. Still needs to be wikified. --Woohookitty 02:56, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Weak Delete, minor fictious character, article as it stands is un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 03:25, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Article can be fixed, minor character or not, still contains useful information.Cerceole|(talk) 03:27, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete. This character isn't notable on its own, the movie page is good enough for it. And this article is not only unencyclopedic, it's also annoying as a big spoiler (it tells every detail of the movie). I don't think this could grow to become a nice article. And the movie article already contains a nice, non-annoying plot summary. JoaoRicardo 05:07, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Anything that needs tp be said can be said in the movie's article. Unnecessary and poorly written breakout. -R. fiend 05:58, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete, or merge/redir to movie article, which could use some expansion. Niteowlneils 17:46, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Weak keep, strong cleanup. Contains useful information about a character in a notable enough film (though I never watched it). Strong cleanup because it's hard to read, weak keep because it's about a minor character. --Death phoenix 02:57, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)