Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Gzornenplatz/Proposed decision

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jguk (talk | contribs) at 21:05, 31 January 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

May I suggest:

(which Jimbo has the option to review) instead of (optionally subject to review by Jimbo), for clarity? --fvw* 20:12, 2005 Jan 31 (UTC)

3RR

"All users must follow the three-revert rule unless otherwise restricted by decree of the Arbitration Committee or by Jimbo Wales" comes too close to "Every user is entitled to revert any article 3 times in 24 hours". Reverting an article (or even worse, many articles) 3 times each 24 hours for a prolonged period of time is itself disruptive and should be discouraged. As noted by whoever left the "abstain" before, the 3RR does not apply to Gzornenplatz/Wik in any case, as he is subject to a 1RR, jguk 21:04, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Lack of previous ban?

Presumably the ArbCom have asked Jimbo whether or not he has actually banned Wik/Gzornenplatz. It would be useful if the ArbCom would publish Jimbo's reply, jguk 21:05, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Gzornenplatz/Proposed_decision&oldid=9835551"