Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cromer high

Cromer high

Sigh - yes, I know there are other schools listed but, really, do we have to consider the alleged worthiness of every provincial state sinkhole in existence?? Delete. Eddie.willers 03:58, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep. The alternative to keeping or merging schools is precisely to have to consider and vote on the alleged worthiness of each school and its article. Kappa 06:59, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe I'm dense, but I do not understand what is wrong with considering each article on its merits rather than applying either kind of a blinkered, blanket philosophy. And before anybody wheels out the biting-newbies question, well, the newbies are writing an encyclopedia too and scrutiny is an important part of that process. Oh, and I'm abstaining. -Splash^talk 22:57, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete schoolcruft. Dunc|☺ 14:20, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm... a High School..... KEEP--Nicodemus75 15:20, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fix the name if it's kept (but I really hope it isn't). Proto t c 15:22, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "Consider and vote on the alleged worthiness of each school" is exactly what's appropriate. This article mentions nothing special or notable about the school. It's a Specialist school which sounds initially as if it might be slightly notable, but it turns out that "Currently there are over 2,000 specialist schools; which is over two thirds of the schools in England." The schools which are not specialist schools would appear to be more notable than those which are. Dpbsmith (talk) 18:07, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Schools are no more notable than apartment buildings. Bunchofgrapes 18:36, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]