Talk:Occult/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
OneClickArchiver creating Occult King of the Hill |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 07:49, 22 October 2023
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Occult. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Occult King of the Hill
I have recently come to the conclusion that self proclaimed occultists, often feel obligated to dismissing the ideologies of previous occultists. This is most notable with Anton LaVey and Aleister Crowley. I am not accusing these men of anything, I simply want to know if others have noticed the neccesity of occultists to break away from traditional occult ideas and dismiss them as rubish. In reality many of theses examples blatantly steal from the previous.
- This is a better subject for a newsgroup. I'm sure there are authors who state that Crowley and LaVey broke with tradition. What they say may or may not be worth including in some of the articles here. What we think about the issue is of no interest though. Fuzzypeg☻ 23:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Crowley had a lot to do with modern NeoPaganism, as he helped both Gardner and Nichols develop Wicca and Druidism respectively. SundarkAdept (talk) 00:57, 28 February 2023 (UTC)