User talk:Dbachmann: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:31, 11 April 2007

archive1: 21 Jul 2004 (UTC) – 10 Nov 2004 (UTC) / 2: – 25 Nov 04 / 3: – 19 Dec 04 / 4: – 11 Jan 05 / 5: – 8 Mar 05 / 6: – 6 May 05 / 7: – 1 Jul 05 / 8: – 12 Aug 05 / 9: – 7 Nov 05 / A: – 13 Dec 05 / B: – 16 Jan 06 C: – 22 Feb 06 / D: – 21 March 06 / E: – 19 May 06 / F: – 5 Jul 06 / 10 – 9 Aug 06 / <11: – 9 Sep 06 / 12: – 2 Oct 06 / 13: – 23 Oct 06 / 14: – 30 Nov 06 / 15: – 17:53, 4 Jan 07 / 16 – 05:16, 16 Feb 07 / 17: – 08:28, 19 Mar 07 / 18: – 02:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

DRV

I am sure you understand that my comment at the DRV on H.p. is primarily based on the feeling it would be more productive not to debate the matter further--not from any disagreement with your basic view--and i notice that Guy said the same--one of the few times he & I agree.DGG 22:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sure, it would be best not to debate it any further, after the out-of-process deletion has been reverted. If that doesn't happen, you know how these things go, we'll never hear the end of it. dab (𒁳) 22:45, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the edit warring has already started at Hindutva. Just look at the arguments given. How predictable. So much for cozy pipedreams of mergability. This may not be DGG's intent, but the message is that the Hindu section of WP has been abandoned as a hopeless case. Will that hurt WP? Who knows. After all, even the moon has kalańka. rudra 00:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

that seems to be the gist, yes: the Hindus are hopeless, let them build their dreamworld. Instead of commending the few Wikipedians that still hold out attempting to let sanity prevail, the verdict seems to be that they are somehow culturally insensitive for not letting the "ethnic" people revel in their own truth. This is racist: they are ethnic, they don't know any better, leave them in peace. I keep getting attacked as "racist" for my fundamentally anti-racist position that everybody has a brain and is expected to use it, regardless of where they are from. It is not alright to disrupt Wikipedia with bad faith tactics or utter stupidity just because you are "ethnic". If the Islamists or the Neocons did the same, the community would rise as one (well, as much as it ever does that) and stamp them out, but apparently it is much more acceptable indulge in dishonest revisionism if you are a Hindu, don't ask me why. dab (𒁳) 09:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Can you please take a look at Battle of Thermopylae? Some users are inserting the upper-bound of ancient estimates in the infobox, which is an impossible mythical 5.2 million Persians! Yet, the same users are removing the lower-bound of modern estimates which is 60,000. This doesn't seem NPOV at all.--Mardavich 02:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 :sure, it would be best not to debate it any further, ''after'' the out-of-process deletion has been reverted. If that doesn't happen, you know how these things go, we'll never hear the end of it. [[User:Dbachmann|dab]] <small>[[User_talk:Dbachmann|(𒁳)]]</small> 22:45, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 Well, the edit warring has already started at [[Hindutva]].  Just look at the arguments given.  How predictable.  So much for cozy pipedreams of mergability.  This may not be DGG's intent, but the message is that the Hindu section of WP has been abandoned as a hopeless case.  Will that hurt WP?  Who knows.  After all, even the moon has ''kalańka''. [[User:Rudrasharman|rudra]] 00:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
+::that seems to be the gist, yes: the Hindus are hopeless, let them build their dreamworld. Instead of commending the few Wikipedians that still hold out attempting to let  sanity prevail, the verdict seems to be that they are somehow culturally insensitive for not letting the "ethnic" people revel in their own truth. ''This'' is racist: they are ethnic, they don't know any better, leave them in peace. I keep getting attacked as "racist" for my fundamentally anti-racist position that everybody has a brain and is expected to use it, regardless of where they are from. It is not alright to disrupt Wikipedia with bad faith tactics or utter stupidity just because you are "ethnic". If the Islamists or the Neocons did the same, the community would rise as one (well, as much as it ever does that) and stamp them out, but apparently it is much more acceptable indulge in dishonest revisionism if you are a Hindu, don't ask me why. [[User:Dbachmann|dab]] <small>[[User_talk:Dbachmann|(𒁳)]]</small> 09:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 == Hi ==