Jump to content

Talk:Harem/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
 
Line 5: Line 5:
The first sentence under 'History' makes no sense:
The first sentence under 'History' makes no sense:
"Contrary to the common belief among some, a Muslim harem is the collective term for the wive(s)and in some cases concubines, only in the case of princes and the very rich it is generally part of a palace and its inhabitants do not necessarily consist solely of women with whom the head of the household has a sexual relation, their young offspring plus staff (women and eunuchs)." ..I'm attempting to fix it.
"Contrary to the common belief among some, a Muslim harem is the collective term for the wive(s)and in some cases concubines, only in the case of princes and the very rich it is generally part of a palace and its inhabitants do not necessarily consist solely of women with whom the head of the household has a sexual relation, their young offspring plus staff (women and eunuchs)." ..I'm attempting to fix it.

{{Clear}}
== Consider Joining the Sexology and Sexuality project ==
Are you a member of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Sexology_and_Sexuality |Wikipedia Sexology and Sexuality wikiproject]] ?

If not, consider joining if you want to make changes to this page, or other pages in this context.

If you don't have that kind of time, and just have a few changes, please note them in those talk pages, unless they are minor edits.

:'''Note:''' You do not need to be a member of this project in order to edit this page, whether or not the edit is minor, per [[Wikipedia:Be bold]], et al. [[User:164.11.204.56|164.11.204.56]] 19:46, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:56, 20 May 2017

Archive 1Archive 2

Huh?

The first sentence under 'History' makes no sense: "Contrary to the common belief among some, a Muslim harem is the collective term for the wive(s)and in some cases concubines, only in the case of princes and the very rich it is generally part of a palace and its inhabitants do not necessarily consist solely of women with whom the head of the household has a sexual relation, their young offspring plus staff (women and eunuchs)." ..I'm attempting to fix it.

Consider Joining the Sexology and Sexuality project

Are you a member of the Wikipedia Sexology and Sexuality wikiproject ?

If not, consider joining if you want to make changes to this page, or other pages in this context.

If you don't have that kind of time, and just have a few changes, please note them in those talk pages, unless they are minor edits.

Note: You do not need to be a member of this project in order to edit this page, whether or not the edit is minor, per Wikipedia:Be bold, et al. 164.11.204.56 19:46, 7 October 2006 (UTC)