User talk:Zawl: Difference between revisions
→Page mover granted: cautionary note |
|||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! [[User:Alex Shih|Alex Shih]][[User_talk:Alex Shih|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 07:39, 7 September 2017 (UTC) |
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! [[User:Alex Shih|Alex Shih]][[User_talk:Alex Shih|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 07:39, 7 September 2017 (UTC) |
||
:: {{u|Zawl}}, I have browsed through your 2016 and some part of your 2017 archives, and I did not find any major problem that stands out in particular. It appears that you have largely avoided controversies since the indefinite block incident last year. However, there may be parts that I have missed. I want to be clear that the page mover access can be revoked anytime by any admin, if there are evidences of controversial editing behaviour or problematic page moves. Be cautious, and let me know if you have any questions. [[User:Alex Shih|Alex Shih]][[User_talk:Alex Shih|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 07:58, 7 September 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== Since when has it been WP policy to writeonly in the past tense? == |
== Since when has it been WP policy to writeonly in the past tense? == |
||
Revision as of 07:59, 7 September 2017
| Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
| This is Zawl's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
Article policies
|
| Archives: 1 |
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
In response to "goal song".
Hello,
It just seemed to me that the terminology was wrong, as the majority of music played at sporting events contains no singing and thus cannot be called a song. But no worries, its only a small thing and nothing to stress about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.111.6.251 (talk) 01:10, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Page mover granted
Hello, Zawl. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).
Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.
Useful links:
- Wikipedia:Requested moves
- Category:Articles to be moved, for article renaming requests awaiting action.
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Alex ShihTalk 07:39, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Zawl, I have browsed through your 2016 and some part of your 2017 archives, and I did not find any major problem that stands out in particular. It appears that you have largely avoided controversies since the indefinite block incident last year. However, there may be parts that I have missed. I want to be clear that the page mover access can be revoked anytime by any admin, if there are evidences of controversial editing behaviour or problematic page moves. Be cautious, and let me know if you have any questions. Alex ShihTalk 07:58, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Since when has it been WP policy to writeonly in the past tense?
2605:E000:9161:A500:F8FF:295F:5705:F1CE (talk) 07:44, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- I've corrected them. It was a misunderstanding. — Zawl 07:45, 7 September 2017 (UTC)