Talk:Tripolitania

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Africa: Libya Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libya portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libya (assessed as High-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Tripolitanian Republic ?

So the article about the Libyan flag includes a mention of a 1918-1923 "Tripolitanian Republic" which redirects to "Tripolitania", which includes no mention of this alleged republic ? Italy was not on the losing side of WW1 and as far as I have been able to determine, did not lose control of Libya in the aftermath of that war, so what is this supposed republic ? Needs some details if anybody knows. Eregli bob (talk) 10:47, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 December 2022

It has been proposed in this section that Tripolitania be renamed and moved to Tripolitania (region).

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Tripolitania → Tripolitania (region) – Not the WP:PTOPIC. For example, the article Ottoman Tripolitania has twice the number of hits. New name consistent with e.g. Syria (region) and Palestine (region). Onceinawhile (talk) 14:14, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, this would also mean Tripolitania (disambiguation) → Tripolitania. Onceinawhile (talk) 20:26, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Page views are not the only method of determining a primary topic; in this case, because the existing Tripolitania article discusses the region throughout history, I feel that it serves as a broad-concept article with sufficient long-term significance to hold the primary title. Personally, I don't find the cases of Syria and Palestine to be analogous; both of those regions share their names with currently extant countries, so it would be WP:ASTONISHing for the titles to point to historical regions instead. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 20:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I don't see the point in a broad-concept article that isn't primary. Onceinawhile, you removed material from this article back in September. Why? What do you see this article as? Srnec (talk) 03:34, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Srnec: Over many years the scope of the article had become a confused mix between the specific modern post-Italian province and the general varied-definition historical region. The confusion likely came about because we were missing an article on the modern province, so I created it at Tripolitania (province), moving some but not all of the related text. This article was, is, and should remain a broad-concept article about the region and its related but widely-varied historical definitions, as per WP:DABCONGEO.

The nub of this debate so far seems to be whether a broad-concept article should always sit at the base name, even if it is materially less popular as a topic versus the individually-defined related articles. ModernDayTrilobite points out above that it wouldn’t be appropriate for the broad-concept article to sit at the base name if that base name is also the name of a country. We could make other such exceptions I am sure, making it all very complicated. Hence I advocate for a simpler interpretation – if, despite base title advantage, a broad-concept article doesn’t end up being the most viewed topic, then it probably shouldn’t sit at the base name. That would be consistent with the WP:BCA guideline which has a foundational assumption that …if the primary meaning of a term proposed for disambiguation is a broad concept….

Onceinawhile (talk) 12:31, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't work for history articles. If period A is the most popular in the history of X, it doesn't get to sit at "History of X". So the question is, is that what this is? It certainly seems to be what it is to me: a history of Tripolitania article, since the term refers to human geography. Srnec (talk) 01:49, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. They're all regions! But I would agree that this is the primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:51, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]