Talk:Lê Thái Tông

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Vietnam

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 15:16, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

– reverting undiscussed moves and redirect locks, restoring consistency ("Consistency – The title is consistent with the pattern of similar articles' titles") within Category:Lê Dynasty emperors, Category:Lý Dynasty emperors Category:Trần Dynasty emperors, Category:Early Lê dynasty emperors, Category:Mạc dynasty emperors and with main articles Lê Dynasty Lý Dynasty Trần Dynasty Đinh Dynasty Mạc Dynasty. Following also many RMs and last year's RfC majority. Sources mixed, a few emperors get mentions in paperback books, most only appear in Vietnamese and academic English sources. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:22, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support for procedural reasons and on the merits. There are some sources that can't type diacritics or have style manuals that prohibit diacritics. Wikipedia does not. — AjaxSmack 00:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.