Jump to content

User:Very Polite Person/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Field propulsion is a term encompassing several concepts of proposed and theoretical spacecraft propulsion systems that allow spacecraft to move without expelling propellant, but instead momentum and propulsion of the spacecraft is changed by interaction of the craft with external fields, such as magnetic and gravitational fields.[1] In effect, where current modern spacecraft generate motion by forcefully expelling matter, a field propulsion system may instead move the craft by causing external effects to forcefully manipulate the craft. Two methods have been claimed to have achieved successful proof of concept, which are electrohydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics. Other proposed theoretical methods include technologies like the Woodward effect, Alcubierre drives, and quantum vacuum propulsion. Such ideas often stem from theoretical physics and are influenced by concepts in general relativity, electromagnetism, and quantum mechanics.[2][3][4][5][6]

Background

[edit]

Placeholder.[1]

Practical methods (old)

[edit]

Although not presently in wide use for space, there exist proven terrestrial examples of "field propulsion", in which electromagnetic fields act upon a conducting medium such as seawater or plasma for propulsion, is known as magnetohydrodynamics or MHD. MHD is similar in operation to electric motors, however rather than using moving parts or metal conductors, fluid or plasma conductors are employed. The EMS-1 and more recently the Yamato 1[7] are examples of such electromagnetic Field propulsion systems, first described in 1994.[8]There is potential to apply MHD to the space environment such as in experiments like NASA's electrodynamic tether, Lorentz Actuated Orbits,[9] the wingless electromagnetic air vehicle, and magnetoplasmadynamic thruster (which does use propellant).

Electrohydrodynamics is another method whereby electrically charged fluids are used for propulsion and boundary layer control such as ion propulsion[citation needed]

Other practical methods which could be loosely considered as field propulsion include: The gravity assist trajectory, which uses planetary gravity fields and orbital momentum; Solar sails and magnetic sails use respectively the radiation pressure and solar wind for spacecraft thrust; aerobraking uses the atmosphere of a planet to change relative velocity of a spacecraft. The last two actually involve the exchange of momentum with physical particles and are not usually expressed as an interaction with fields, but they are sometimes included as examples of field propulsion since no spacecraft propellant is required. An example is the Magsail magnetic sail design.[10]: Sec. VIII 

Practical methods (new)

[edit]

Placeholder

Theoretical methods (old)

[edit]

Other concepts that have been proposed are speculative, using "frontier physics" and concepts from modern physics. So far none of these methods have been unambiguously demonstrated, much less proven practical.

The Woodward effect is based on a controversial concept of inertia and certain solutions to the equations for General Relativity. Experiments attempting to conclusively demonstrate this effect have been conducted since the 1990s.

In contrast, examples of proposals for field propulsion that rely on physics outside the present paradigms are various schemes for faster-than-light, warp drive and antigravity, and often amount to little more than catchy descriptive phrases, with no known physical basis[citation needed]. Until it is shown that the conservation of energy and momentum break down under certain conditions (or scales), any such schemes worthy of discussion must rely on energy and momentum transfer to the spacecraft from some external source such as a local force field, which in turn must obtain it from still other momentum and/or energy sources in the cosmos (in order to satisfy conservation of both energy and momentum).[citation needed]

Several people have speculated that the Casimir effect could be used to create a propellantless drive, often described as the "Casimir Sail", or a "Quantum Sail".[11][12][13][14]

Theoretical methods (new)

[edit]

Placeholder.

Field propulsion based on physical structure of space (old)

[edit]

This concept is based on the general relativity theory and the quantum field theory from which the idea that space has a physical structure can be proposed. The macroscopic structure is described by the general relativity theory and the microscopic structure by the quantum field theory. The idea is to deform space around the space craft. By deforming the space it would be possible to create a region with higher pressure behind the space craft than before it. Due to the pressure gradient a force would be exerted on the space craft which in turn creates thrust for propulsion.[15] Due to the purely theoretical nature of this propulsion concept it is hard to determine the amount of thrust and the maximum velocity that could be achieved. Currently there are two different concepts for such a field propulsion system one that is purely based on the general relativity theory and one based on the quantum field theory.[4]

In the general relativistic field propulsion system space is considered to be an elastic field similar to rubber which means that space itself can be treated as an infinite elastic body. If the space-time curves, a normal inwards surface stress is generated which serves as a pressure field. By creating a great number of those curve surfaces behind the space craft it is possible to achieve a unidirectional surface force which can be use for the acceleration of the space craft.[15]

For the quantum field theoretical propulsion system it is assumed, as stated by the quantum field theory and quantum Electrodynamics, that the quantum vacuum consists out of a zero-radiating electromagnetic field in a non-radiating mode and at a zero-point energy state, the lowest possible energy state. It is also theorized that matter is composed out of elementary primary charged entities, partons, which are bound together as elementary oscillators. By applying an electromagnetic zero point field a Lorentz force is applied on the partons. Using this on a dielectric material could affect the inertia of the mass and that way create an acceleration of the material without creating stress or strain inside the material.[15]

Field propulsion based on physical structure of space (new?)

[edit]

Placeholder.

Conservation Laws (old)

[edit]

Conservation of momentum is a fundamental requirement of propulsion systems because in experiments momentum is always conserved.[16] This conservation law is implicit in the published work of Newton and Galileo, but arises on a fundamental level from the spatial translation symmetry of the laws of physics, as given by Noether's theorem. In each of the propulsion technologies, some form of energy exchange is required with momentum directed backward at the speed of light 'c' or some lesser velocity 'v' to balance the forward change of momentum. In absence of interaction with an external field, the power 'P' that is required to create a thrust force 'F' is given by when mass is ejected or if mass-free energy is ejected.

For a photon rocket the efficiency is too small to be competitive.[17] Other technologies may have better efficiency if the ejection velocity is less than speed of light, or a local field can interact with another large scale field of the same type residing in space, which is the intent of field effect propulsion.

Conservation Laws (new?)

[edit]

Placeholder.

Advantages and disadvantages (old)

[edit]

The main advantage of a field propulsion systems is that no propellant is needed, only an energy source. This means that no propellant has to be stored and transported with the space craft which makes it attractive for long term interplanetary or even interstellar crewed missions.[15] With current technology a large amount of fuel meant for the way back has to be brought to the destination which increases the payload of the overall space craft significantly. The increased payload of fuel, thus requires more force to accelerate it, requiring even more fuel which is the primary drawback of current rocket technology. Approximately 83% of a Hydrogen-Oxygen powered rocket, which can achieve orbit, is fuel.[18]

The idea that with field propulsion no fuel tank would be required is technically inaccurate. The energy required to reach the high speeds involved begins to be non-neglectable for interstellar travel. For example, a 1-tonne spaceship traveling at 1/10 of the speed of light carries a kinetic energy of 4.5 × 1017 joules, equal to 5 kg according to the mass–energy equivalence. This means that for accelerating to such speed, no matter how this is achieved, the spaceship must have converted at least 5 kg of mass/energy into momentum, imagining 100% efficiency. Although such mass has not been "expelled" it has still been "disposed".

Advantages and disadvantages (new)

[edit]

Placeholder.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Choueiri, Edgar Y. (2012-05-23). "A Critical History of Electric Propulsion: The First Fifty Years (1906-1956)" (PDF). Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory and Princeton University. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2024-02-26. Retrieved 2024-03-14.
  2. ^ "NASA Field Resonance Propulsion Concept" (PDF). NASA, NASA Technical Reports Server. August 1979. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-12-08. Retrieved 2024-09-15.
  3. ^ "NASA Advanced beamed-energy and field propulsion concepts" (PDF). NASA, NASA Technical Reports Server. August 1979. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-12-14. Retrieved 2024-09-15.
  4. ^ a b Minami, Yoshinari; Musha, Takaaki (February 2013). "Field propulsion systems for space travel". Acta Astronautica. 82 (2): 215–20. Bibcode:2013AcAau..82..215M. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.02.027.
  5. ^ Gelbwaser-Klimovsky, David; Graham, Noah; Kardar, Mehran; Krüger, Matthias (2013-04-28). "Near Field Propulsion Forces from Nonreciprocal Media". Physical Review Letters. 17 (2): 215–20. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.170401. Archived from the original on 2024-09-15.
  6. ^ Froning, Jr., H.; Roach, R. (2012-08-17). "Field propulsion for future needs". American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. doi:10.2514/6.1992-3780. Archived from the original on 2024-09-15.
  7. ^ Akagi, Shinsuke; Fujita, Kikuo; Soga, Kazuo (May 27, 1994). "Optimal Design of Thruster System for Superconducting Electromagnetic Propulsion Ship" (PDF). Proceedings of the 5th International Marine Design Conference. Retrieved November 30, 2022.
  8. ^ US 5333444, Meng, James C. S., "Superconducting electromagnetic thruster", published 1994-08-02, assigned to United States Secretary of the Navy 
  9. ^ Peck, Mason A. "Lorentz-Actuated Orbits: Electrodynamic Propulsion without a Tether" (PDF). Retrieved November 30, 2022.
  10. ^ Zubrin, Robert M.; Andrews, Dana G. (March 1991). "Magnetic sails and interplanetary travel". Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 28 (2): 197–203. Bibcode:1991JSpRo..28..197Z. doi:10.2514/3.26230. ISSN 0022-4650.
  11. ^ "Running on empty". New Scientist. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  12. ^ DeBiase, R. L. (2010-01-28). "A Light Sail Inspired Model to Harness Casimir Forces for Propellantless Propulsion". AIP Conference Proceedings. 1208 (1): 153–167. Bibcode:2010AIPC.1208..153D. doi:10.1063/1.3326244. ISSN 0094-243X. OSTI 21370934.
  13. ^ DeBiase, R. L. (2010-01-01). "A Light Sail Inspired Model to Harness Casimir Forces for Propellantless Propulsion". Space. AIP Conference Proceedings. 1208 (1): 153–167. Bibcode:2010AIPC.1208..153D. doi:10.1063/1.3326244.
  14. ^ Seife, Charles, ed. (2000). Zero: the biography of a dangerous idea. A New York Times Notable Book (1. publ ed.). New York: Viking. pp. 187–188. ISBN 978-0-14-029647-1.
  15. ^ a b c d Musha, Takaaki (15 February 2018). Field Propulsion System for Space Travel: Physics of Non-Conventional Propulsion Methods for Interstellar Travel. Bentham Books. pp. 20–37. ISBN 978-1-60805-566-1.
  16. ^ Ho-Kim, Quang; Kumar, Narendra; Lam, Harry C. S. (2004). Invitation to Contemporary Physics (illustrated ed.). World Scientific. p. 19. ISBN 978-981-238-303-7. Extract of page 19
  17. ^ There will be no photon rocket, by V. Smilga http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/611872.pdf Archived 2017-05-17 at the Wayback Machine
  18. ^ Pettit, Don. "The Tyranny of the Rocket Equation". NASA. Archived from the original on 2016-10-29. Retrieved 2016-11-04.
Cite error: A list-defined reference has no name (see the help page).
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Very_Polite_Person/sandbox&oldid=1246057360"