I have noticed both of you are still reverting my edits on all articles. Please can you explain what you are trying to achieve? It’s sad you are doing this. I suspect you may be getting me confused with another user. Although, I’m not sure how given our usernames aren’t remotely similar. If you have a problem with my edits, let’s sort this out by asking moderators to step in. 2.96.227.72 (talk) 15:11, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's really easy. We hate sockpuppetry. You are banned for life from Wikipedia. You are not allowed to edit and any edits that you make can / should be reverted regardless of their merit. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:13, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am concerned by your behaviour. I think you are mistaking me for somebody else. At what point have I been banned? I would recommend chilling out. Anyway, I’ll be making sure your behaviour is flagged to moderators one way or another. 2.96.227.72 (talk) 15:19, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I saw that you've reverted my edits on the Irritable bowel syndrome article. Please note that removing constant mentioning of study types is according to WikiProject Medicine guidelines. It does not add any extra information (we should use secondary sources anyway and the paper's title in the reference will tell the reader what kind of study it is). More importantly it makes Wikipedia articles less accessible and written more like an academic paper. The average reader does not know and does not have to know what a meta analysis means. I'll reinstate my edits, please let me know if you disagree with any on a case-by-case basis.
