User talk:Werdan7

Redirects

I could use some help. How do you redirect a page? -Razorflame 20:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My Swiss Articles

Please don't delete any of my Swiss articles please. I have been working hard on making them simplified enough from the english version of Wikipedia to here, so any of the Swiss articles in the mainspace are the ones that I've went through and simplified.

Thanks, -Razorflame 01:37, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Congratulations: You have been given a Barnstar!

For your hard anti-vandalism work. — Lights (talk) 23:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Congratulations: You have been given a Barnstar!

For deleting my first attack page directed against me, I hereby award you this barnstar.

From Razorflame! -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 20:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Simple English Wiktionary

Hey Werdan7, I just created my first article on Simple English Wiktionary. Can you take a look at it to make sure that it is alright? Thanks, -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 02:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wait...

You're an administrator? I either totally forgot or never knew at all...--Isis §^(talk) 00:55, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Friends

I hope you and I can be friends. I have added you to my personal friends list and hope you will do the same. Razorflame (contributions) Talk 02:41, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Do you think that 1 month is still too early to do an RfA? Razorflame (contributions) Talk 03:16, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Patrolling New Pages

I have just been through the new pages page and have found that there are at least 500 articles that haven't been patrolled yet. Why don't the admins patrol pages regularly instead of not very often? Razorflame (contributions) Talk 05:26, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thanks

Dear Werdan7,

Thank you for your participation in my RFA which closed successfully with 19 supports and 1 oppose which didn't count since it was made by a sock of a banned user. If you have any comments, concerns, or any suggestions for me as an Administrator, feel free to leave a note on my talkpage. Thank you. Lights talk 13:44, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Congratulations: You have been given a Barnstar!

For showing me the test wiki. Razor fla me 00:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thanks!

Dear Werdan7.

I'd like to thank you deeply for participating in my RfA, which came out successful just today.

I'm happy to say that I'll be more active than ever now, and that any page that needs protecting or any vandal that needs blocking will be done so (unless someone beats me to it!). If you have any comments to make, concerns or even critisism, then please leave a message on my talk page.

Gwib^-(talk)- 00:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Missed one

Gulf of Saint Lawrence. A QD page. Razor flame 19:55, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simple talk

The simple talk page is getting a bit big. Can I archive a few of the oldest discussions on the page to reduce the size of it? Razor flame 19:13, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Year pages

Just to let you know, all of the pages you created that didn't have any content besides Events, Births, Deaths, and a navigation box have been deleted. It probably goes without saying, but please don't create any more empty pages. Thank you. · Ty grrr... 19:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Hey. I am considering running for WP:RFA, but I just want somebodys input if I should or not - heres a link to my edit count -- Da Punk '95 talk 21:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

It's nice to have you back again! Let's hope you stay this time :) Cheers, Razor flame 19:38, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a little present for you:

Somebody has given you some cookies! Now enjoy them!

Leo Belgicus

I was in the process of fixing up the article without having to delete it, but oh well. Cheers, Razor flame 14:59, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gshtrae with Tempo

I was just about to ask you if you would protect that page because it was recreated 4 times in the past 12 hours, but I see that you beat me to it. Cheers, Razor flame 16:36, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I have never met you, but I didn't notice any other people on recent changes who had this kind of access. Can you delete this page User:American Eagle/2 (I already moved it to a different namespace). I'll talk to you later, AmericanEagle 04:37, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Fail

I didn't withdraw...-- † Christian Man 16 04:55, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please relist it...it probably will fail no matter what...but it should have it's chance.-- † Christian Man 16 13:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay

I'll remember in the future, I wasn't just putting the on everybody's page, though. But I'm sorry. By the way, can you give a vote. I don't want it to fail for lack of them. Thanks, AmericanEagle 05:36, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see you haven't gotten in a message in 1 month (my last message to you), so I'll give you one. Thank you for deleting the subpage I asked for. Cheers -- ✰American Eagle 01:35, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wondering

How long is the one person going to be blocked? Is the person going to be blocked forever or for some odd reason like a year from now he will be unblocked?-- Running talk , the founder the Wikiproject Anti-Vandalism 05:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

<butting in> Hey there. That user is blocked indef because s/he was a vandal-only account. I wouldn't say forever though. If the user requests an unblock, and an admin unblocks the user for a reasonable reason, he will be unblocked. If he starts vandalizing again, then another block will be issued. 1 year blocks really only occur if an IP is a school IP or similar. -- RyanCross (talk) 06:01, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

=) I know it was a vandal account only.-- Running talk , the founder the Wikiproject Anti-Vandalism 06:03, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok..

I saw 2 new users be made at the same time. my guess is that there sockpuppets of the guy you just blocked(i'm not biting the new comers)-- Running talk , the founder the Wikiproject Anti-Vandalism 06:11, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

<butting in> I highly doubt it. The first one is just standing there (I thought he would have vandalized by now) and the second one seems to be doing good. Let me check if Werdan7 blocked the user from creating new accounts. -- RyanCross (talk) 06:17, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You do that but still until you find out i'm guessing there sockpuppets. I could be wrong.-- Running talk , the founder the Wikiproject Anti-Vandalism 06:19, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, according to the block log, you should see along with the block "account creation disabled". That means the user cannot create new accounts with his IP. No worries. They aren't sockpuppets. Werdan7, sorry for taking your job here. I just felt like I had to reply. ;) -- RyanCross (talk) 06:20, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, that's ok, I had to step out for a moment. I agree that neither accounts are related, although Printingprofessionals may be a promotional account, so I'll keep an eye on it.--Werdan7^{T @} 06:28, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Homeopathy

I'm sorry, but Giggy, by her own admission in her edit summry, did not check the sources, and accidentally changed things in ways that directly conflicted or misprepresented their arguments. That is not a more "NPOV" version, that is a less accurate version of an article on a subject that is famously unsupported by evidence. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:00, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

but the sources say that it almost certtainly doesn't work! and that's what dilution and succussion is: alternative processes of dilution and shaking. If you don't know anything about the subject, kindly don't lecture that accurate depiction is POV.

Seriously, check the sources. I can give you more, if you like. I didn't even quote the Lancet editorial that was prrinted witht he Shang editorial that said (paraphrase, but pretty accurate) that the time for research had passed, homeopathy had been disproven, it was time for doctors to tell their patients that homeopathy does not work. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For succussion and dilution - that's just the latin for "shaking" and "diluting". Check any homeopathic text that says how to prepare remedies, and tell me how you'd convert that into simple English.

What's wrong with stating the simple facts? Must we pussyfoot around things so that, instead of saying what is already a weaker form than the Lancet's position paper. (The Lancet, Volume 366, Number 9487, 27 August 2005 "The end of homeopathy"), what would you have us say? That there is no evidence? We're simple english Wikipedia. That requires a certain amount of plain-speaking. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:20, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it weren't for the major accuracy problems, I wouldn't mind changing the words, but once things started to say completely different things than the references, I started to get upsset =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent vandalism

Hi, regarding this, I think it is the banned user Freddy making lots more SOCKS. Thanks for jumping in when you did! Makes me almost want to submit myself for an RFA :) fr33kman ^{t - c} 03:52, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Username block

Hiya, thanks for fixing the settings, I was just about to do it when I noticed you had. Question; shouldn't "cock" be on the regex blacklist? fr33kman ^talk 01:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries on the block! You did the right thing. Your regex looks okay although *cock* would probably have been fine too; I can't imagine the acceptable username that has cock inside it. Let's see if that fixes it :) Cheers fr33kman ^talk 01:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Toolserveraccount

Hello Werdan7,
please send your real-name, your wikiname, your Freenode-nick (if you have one), your prefered login-name and the public part of your ssh-key to . We plan to create your account soon then. --DaB. 00:28, 12 March 2009 (UTC)