Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level". Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
| |
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. — Czello (music) 16:39, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- If we do that, since we usually go to full-protection for only a few days and MediaWiki does not currently allow us to layer full and semi-protections, the article would remain unprotected when the protection expires until we could reprotect it if necessary. Might 1RR be a better option? Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- 1RR would be a decent solution as this is a CTOPs article — Czello (music) 07:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swamini Brahmaprajnananda Saraswati (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism in AFD. Gauravs 51 (talk) 07:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Gauravs 51 (talk) 07:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: I eventually come across this page entitled as Sukerchakia Misl but before any further expedition, I immediately figure out an Jassu712 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who creating the problematic turbulence while allegedly having serious conflict of interest with WP:CASTE and acting like an arrogant individual while oversighting the poor quality source without providing any quotations not at all, look at this issue asap Our Panjāb (talk) 08:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- you are the one who creating trouble i already provided more reliable sources then you the only source you have who is gs chhabra you need multiple sources to cross check information it's true or but all you mentioned is self published book or website Jassu712 (talk) 08:09, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- and with my each reference i provide page number to with multiple sources to verify information unlike you i don't have any conflict of interest it's you who is obsessed with caste Jassu712 (talk) 08:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Comment:: look at his attention,within the matter of time he gambled the access of extended confirm right to hypothetically breaking the outlaw of Wikipedia Our Panjāb (talk) 08:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: look like suspect it self playing the victim card to gain the sympathy from the rest of us but in this case you are exceeding all regulation of Wikipedia, wait for some movement of time before doing such organised way of manipulation Our Panjāb (talk) 08:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- you are the one who playing victim let's see who is wrong i already told you to ask neutral point of view but instead you want to do edit war with me go and read "WP:V" you need some knowledge about Wikipedia Jassu712 (talk) 08:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- and instead of argue why don't you provide multiple reliable sources? with page number from reputable author's Jassu712 (talk) 08:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think so but we can clearly you see the repulsiveness of behaviour , as far i know @MaplesyrupSushi is the experience contributor who added the content on this page
- Disclaimer: this is not talk page respectfully leave this page before someone invigilate on behalf of us Our Panjāb (talk) 08:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- The Sikhs Commonwealth or Rise and Fall of the Sikh Misls by Hari Ram Gupta page number 293 clearly mentioned Maharaja Ranjit Singh ancestors are Sans jatt Jassu712 (talk) 08:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
+1 Temporary Extended-protection: Persistent vandalism. and edit war by User:103.132.8.24 using very abusing language even giving rape threats and Our Panjāb is also engaged in edit war and report by me and AKP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jassu712 (talk • contribs) 11:13, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:51, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment::yes he was engaged in edit war but i still request for page protection for avoiding future disruptive edit Jassu712 (talk) 13:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 15:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- List of programmes broadcast by Nicktoons (British and Irish TV channel) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP addresses has continued after a previous protection. SB678 (talk) 08:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated edits, mostly by unregistered users, changing his nationality from Russian to Ukrainian without any discussion. [1] [2] [3] [4]
That dispute itself is covered in the article and no serious scholar considers him Ukrainian in any meaningful way. --Երևանցի talk 08:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jlwoodwa (talk) 10:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive minor edits by various IP socks of blocked user User:Harry the house, going back months - most recently 146.199.140.43. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 11:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 146.199.140.43 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. Favonian (talk) 17:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Doraemon: Nobita's Great Adventure into the Underworld (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. M S Hassan 📬✍🏻 12:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Disruptive addition of unsourced content. HorrorLover555 (talk) 13:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:PIA. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:07, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Svito3 (talk) 14:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – block evasion occured right after the page was unprotected. Plasticwonder (talk) 15:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2a0d:e487:3100::/40 (talk · contribs).
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:54, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-protection - We have a series of IPs who're claiming SSR is still alive and being hidden by his management - a far cry from what was the case even last year but still not something supported by the sources. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: I think it would be a good idea to protect this article so that users without an account cannot edit them, since for about a month there has been a user with an IP from Macedonia (the last one he used was 77.29.162.92) who is constantly being blocked because he keeps vandalizing football team articles (Málaga CF, Real Oviedo, Granada CF, Athletic Bilbao, FK Partizan, FK Voždovac, etc.) AlejandroR1990 (talk) 16:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalized three times in the five hours after a six-month protection block expired. Ttwaring (talk) 17:21, 7 October 2024 (UTC)