Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Grodzinsky

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Keep Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:52, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Alan Grodzinsky

CV, and not too impressive at that. Denni☯ 23:46, 2005 May 31 (UTC)

• Delete. — Phil Welch 00:31, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity. K1Bond007 05:38, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not a CV base. Sjakkalle 06:43, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, once I've rewritten it. I think MIT professors have better things to do than post a fractional CV here, and since a quick Google suggest AJ Grodzinsky is the recipient of an NIH Merit Award, he's obviously doing some good research. But the article as it was written was terrible. Average Earthman 13:29, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Oh yes, and he's a Sc.D, not a PhD, so Grodzinsky clearly didn't write the original. Possibly an undergrad who attends some of his lectures did. I've improved the article. Average Earthman 13:44, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, Alan Grodzinsky is a respected researcher in OsteoArthritis.
  • Comment by 18.125.6.52 (talk · contributions)
• Keep, seems notable. Martg76 21:08, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. The version by Average Earthman is a vast improvement over the meaningless original, and the subject certainly seems notable enough. -- Captain Disdain 00:46, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Notable. JamesBurns 10:16, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and kudos to Average Earthman. --Scimitar 21:38, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep
  • Comment by 24.193.71.230 (talk · contributions)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.