Talk:Logopolis
Doctor Who C‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Television: Episode coverage C‑class | ||||||||||||||||
|
Dalek clip 2005-May-19
Was the Dalek clip in the end montage definitely from Destiny of the Daleks? I've just watched it, and it looks more like it's from Death to the Daleks to me. --DaveJB 17:22, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, it's from Destiny. Episode four, I believe. This is referenced in The Television Companion and the Fourth Doctor Handbook (both by David J Howe, et al.) and on the Outpost Gallifrey episode guide page and the "Brief History of Time (Travel)" website. --khaosworks 21:30, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Part 4's End Credits
In the Trivia section I've noticed that it is stated that Peter Davison gets credited before Tom Baker. This is not accurate and I recommend that this gets edited to keep all information about Doctor Who correct.
- Alan
Watcher
Was the Watcher played by Davison? Kuralyov 18:51, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nope — it was Adrian Gibbs, uncredited. (See here.) —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 20:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Just one addition to Josiah's note that may explain what Kuralyov was remembering. Josiah is correct that Gibbs had played the Watcher throughout the serial. However, during the regeneration scene we first see Baker lying on the ground. He then begins to merge with the Watcher. We then see Gibbs face in the white makeup of the Watcher. Then, for a brief moment, we see Davison's face in the same white makeup and then we see him without the makeup just before he rises up on his elbows. I don't mean to speak for Kuralyov (and apologies for doing so) but if this is what you are remembering then, technically, you could say that Davison did play the Watcher for just a moment at the end of episode four. I hope this is of some help.MarnetteD | Talk 16:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- But, "He (The Watcher) was the Doctor all the time!" Format (talk) 08:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Just one addition to Josiah's note that may explain what Kuralyov was remembering. Josiah is correct that Gibbs had played the Watcher throughout the serial. However, during the regeneration scene we first see Baker lying on the ground. He then begins to merge with the Watcher. We then see Gibbs face in the white makeup of the Watcher. Then, for a brief moment, we see Davison's face in the same white makeup and then we see him without the makeup just before he rises up on his elbows. I don't mean to speak for Kuralyov (and apologies for doing so) but if this is what you are remembering then, technically, you could say that Davison did play the Watcher for just a moment at the end of episode four. I hope this is of some help.MarnetteD | Talk 16:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
"Emboitment"
I vaguely remember this serial from my youth, particularly the computer-geekery about it. One of the key plot elements is a "charged vacuum emboitment"; what is an "emoitment"? The vast majority of Google returns point to Logopolis, and there are a few academic references to the theories of Charles Bonnet, but what does the word mean? What kind of heady mathematical alcohol was Bidmead drinking at the time? Is this the most hard science sci-fi ever broadcast on BBC1 of a Saturday teatime? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 14:22, 14 September 2008 (UTC
Doctor
Should I add The Watcher,since he is technically the 5th incarnation of the Doctor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.49.42.137 (talk • contribs) 15:23, September 19, 2008
- No, because the cast listing should reflect the programme's credits. And despite the line "the Watcher was the Doctor all along", Gibbs is credited as The Watcher.
- I could get into a fan debate about the difference between a "full" incarnation and a projection like the Watcher or Cho-Je, but that would get us into WP:NOTAFORUM territory. For Wikipedia purposes, we should just stick to the facts — in this case, the credits. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 16:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Regeneration4to5.gif
The image Image:Regeneration4to5.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:30, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 08:13, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Resolved
- C-Class Doctor Who articles
- Mid-importance Doctor Who articles
- C-Class television articles
- Unknown-importance television articles
- C-Class Episode coverage articles
- Unknown-importance Episode coverage articles
- Episode coverage task force articles
- Automatically assessed television articles
- WikiProject Television articles