Talk:Dougga

Africa: Tunisia Mid‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tunisia (assessed as High-importance).

World Heritage Sites Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Phoenicia: Ancient Carthage Low‑importance

	Phoenicia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Ancient Carthage task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Please confirm

I have translated the French page on Dougga as it was far superior to the English one, but I would like confirmation of one detail if anyone out there is able to provide it: The French original states that the site was prosperous from the reign of Diocletian until that of Theodosius the Elder. As far as I understand it, Theodosius the Elder was a general, not emperor, but his son, Theodosius I was emperor. I have therefore assumed that this is a mistake in the French original and that the reference should be to the reign of Theodosius I and not to that of Theodosius the Elder. Is this correct? A jacksn (talk) 12:47, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ERA

Note that this edit established the use of the page as BC/AD. Kindly maintain it consistently pending a new consensus to the contrary. — LlywelynII 09:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Name

This edit established the use of the page as American English. Kindly maintain it consistently, pending a new consensus to the contrary. — LlywelynII 09:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This edit included the detail that the name meant or means "pastures" in Berber. That was an unsourced detail but is there good reason to have doubted and removed it? — LlywelynII 09:04, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly, this edit glossed TBGG as being read Thuburgga. Is there a reason to think that was wrong? — LlywelynII 09:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]