Dyskusja wikipedysty:JWBE

Hi!

Hello JWBE, and welcome to Polish Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Thank you for logging in and for your contributions. I hope you like the place and you are going to stay. Our native language is Polish. If you feel you are stuck and need help, you can find answers asking any administrator or experienced Wikipedian (please note that in Polish Wikipedia there is a tradition of posting answers on the discussion page of the user we are talking to, except open discussions: such as votings, article talks or cafeteria).

You can also add this help template: {{pomocy|your problem here}} to your user page, and your questions are going to be answered shortly. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Babel Tower which allows you to find (also by a category) Wikipedians speaking foreign languages
Cafeteria for our foreign guests is a place to discuss any issues in other languages (English preferred)
Preferences allows you to manage your account (e.g. you can change your skin, or interface language)
Help page - (in Polish)

Remember: in pl.wikipedia.org we trust only GFDL, CC and PD graphic licenses, which means we do not accept any fair use content (including screenshots).

Note for interwiki.py bot operators: get the bot flag before running the bot. Bots running without the status will be blocked. Put your request for bot flag.

Once again welcome to Polish Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself :-)!

awersowy # 03:16, 26 lip 2009 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

Und von mir,herzlich Willkommen auf den Seiten der polnischsprachigen Wikipedia.Gruß aus Berlin.--J.Dygas (dyskusja) 13:34, 28 cze 2013 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

"hexafluorki"

Category you created has improper name - in Polish it should be "heksafluorki" or "sześciofluorki" and was deleted. Mithoron (pedo mellon) 19:18, 20 lip 2015 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

It should be "Heksafluorki", but I think there is no need for such category on pl.wiki. Wostr (dyskusja) 22:07, 20 lip 2015 (CEST)[odpowiedz]

Ja, da habe ich beim Erstellen nicht genau geschaut. Allerdings ist die Kategorie langfristig sinnvoll, in de:wp, en:wp und nl:wp praktisch vollständig vertreten. Viele Grüße --JWBE (dyskusja) 23:04, 20 lip 2015 (CEST)[odpowiedz]