Naudotojo aptarimas:JonasS

Vidiniai resursai:

Mano Wiki  |  Mano klausimai  |  Mano atsakymai |  Dienoraštis  |  Mano juodraščiai  |  Galerija  |  Pomėgiai  |  Archyvas

Profile

Yra dalyvio vizitinė...

Požiūris

1. Rašymas savaime nėra vertybė;
2. Enciklopedija yra labai svarbu, tačiau ji nėra viskas;
3. Laisva ir nevaržoma enciklopedija yra labai vertinga, tačiau ji nėra laisva ir nevaržoma;
4. Enciklopedija yra visos žinios, taip pat ir žinios apie žinias.

Veiksni citata

Populiarią enciklopediją „Wikipedia“ sukūręs Jimmy Walesas nusprendė sutelkti dėmesį į internetinę paiešką, praneša BBC.

Papildymas (2007.07.30), Wikipedijos paieška gali keisti Interneto paieškos rezultatų rangavimą: ([1]) :

Jimmy Wales sako, kad Interneto naršytojai, turintys galimybę talpinti straipsnius atvirojoje enciklopedijoje, galėtų paveikti ir Interneto paieškos būdą.

Išminties filosofija

1. Egzistuoja išminties tradicija, mokymas ar doktrina, daugiausia ezoterinė savo prigimtimi, kadaise mokyta slaptose mokyklose ir sutinkama kiekvienos religijos pagrinde;
2. Yra ir visada buvo tie, kurie žino; tie, kurie intensyviomis studijomis, meditacija ir lavinimusi įšventinti į išminties tradiciją. Jie buvo žinomi daugybe vardų: magai ar išminčiai, Pateptieji ar Budos, rišiai ir mahatmos, senųjų misterijų theodidaktikai. Jie tapo ezoterinių tradicijų saugotojais bei perdavėjais;
3. Yra būdas, takas, kelias, vedantis į išmintį. Gali būti daug takų, tačiau, iš principo, kelias kaip toks yra tik vienas. Ir jis apima gyvenimo būdą, savidrausmę, ryžtą mokytis, kas reiškia ne paklusnumą išoriniam mokytojui, o savąjį aukščiausiąjį ir nepažeidžiamą ego.

Iš nepublikuoto teksto

Argumentacijos, logikos klaidos, diskusijų nuostatų ignoravimas

Perkelta į archyvą. Aš nemaitinu trolių!

Administravimas

Sveikiname tapus Vikipedijos administratoriumi!

Prašome, prieš naudojantis administratoriaus privilegijomis, įdėmiai perskaityti elgesio rekomendacijas. Primename, kad administratoriaus teises reikia naudoti tik būtiniausiais atvejais, sprendžiant akivaizdžias problemas (vandalizmą, redagavimo karus ir pan.), šių teisių negalima naudoti asmeniniais tikslais. Jei kils kokių klausimų ar neaiškumų dėl administratoriams suteikiamų papildomų funkcijų, prašome klausti.

Tikiuosi ilgo ir sėkmingo bendradarbiavimo.

Sėkmės,
   knutux

Dėkui... Administravimo aš nelaikau privilegija, o greičiau papildomu rūpesčiu ir didesniu reiklumu (sau)... Nelaikau tai svarbiu pasiekimu, todėl nemanau, tad tai įvykis, vertas didesnio dėmesio - tad prašyčiau negaišti kitų su sveikinimais ir geriau tą laiką skirti Vikipedijos kokybei gerinti... --JonasS 09:31, 30 Gegužės 2006 (EEST)

Persistengta!

Jeigu žmogus yra kažkuo kaltinamas, jis turi teisę gintis ir dalyvauti diskusijose. Tai ne str. kurį reikia rakinti, kad nevyktų redagavimų karai. Prašau gerai pagalvoti prieš blokuojant kitus administratorius, nes akivaizdžiai viršijote savo kompetenciją. --Atlantas 19:17, 2006 Lapkričio 13 (EET)

Gerokai persistengta su tais blokavimais. User:Geltona kortelė.

Absurdas, tai buvo padaryta bandant sustabdyti trolinimą ir vandalizmą ... O aš nemaitinu trolių --JonasS 22:29, 2006 Lapkričio 13 (EET)

Dėl konfliktų kurstymo ir užsipuldinėjimo asm. puslapiuose

Manai, kad tokius dalykus reikia palikti? Aš asmeniškai manau, kad reikia trinti, kaip kad daroma en:wiki, tą patį siūlau ir projekte Wikipedia:Naudotojo puslapis. Beje, kaip administratorę kviečiu aktyviau prisidėti prie šių ir kitų taisyklių svarstymo, kad būtų priimta nors bendriausia tvarka. Nes dabar kas vienam atrodo normalu, kitam gali pasirodyt persistengta ir atvirkščiai. --Nomad 17:44, 2007 rugpjūčio 10 (EEST)

Nemanau kad šiuo metu tinkamiausias metas griežtomis priemonėmis eskaluoti galimus tolimesnius konfliktus. Padėtis šiuo metu pakankamai karšta ir tik tada, kai bus matoma, kad kitos išeities nėra, imtis ryžtingų sprendimų (pvz., gal būt pati savo iniciatyva tą puslapį ištrinsiu)... taisyklės dar nepriimtos, ir siūlomo (ar norimo) nereiktų imti taikyti kaip esamo... --JonasS 17:50, 2007 rugpjūčio 10 (EEST)

Paskutinius kelis mėnesius buvo bandoma spresti padėtį iš pradžių bandymais išsiaiškinti draugiškai, vėliau bandymais išsiaiškinti tiesiog korektiškai, dar vėliau bandymais ignoruoti. Tuo metu gal atrodė gera idėja, dabar mano nuomone atrodo klaida kad viskas buvo taip užleista, bet čia mano nuomonė. Šiaip ar taip, dabartinė padėtis buvo tokia, kad jau tik griežtos priemonės gali kažką keisti, kitos išeities tikrai nėra. Galbūt jei rečiau lankeisi, neatkreipei dėmesio kaip čia jau viskas įsisenėję. Kad taisyklės nepriimtos tas tiesa, bet vikipedijoje yra labai daug formaliai nepriimtų taisyklių, kurios tačiau taikomos vien remiantis common sense. Žinoma, common sense negali būti bet kokio poelgio pateisinimas, tačiau konkrečiu šiuo atveju aš manau ištrinti tekstą su lochais ir purvais yra teisinga. Ypač turint omenyje, kad tas naudotojas yra žinomas tokiais išsireiškimais (pvz. visai nesenas „Knutux jau deda į kelnes nes bijo kad tuoj ir jo veiksmus imsimės svarstyti“ ar senesni dar bjauresni). Atsakymas į administratoriaus įspėjimą „čia ne tavo reikalas tad nesikišk“ irgi šį tą rodo. Šiaip ar taip, jei manai kad reikia palikti, nesikišiu, perleidžiu tavo atsakomybei :) --Nomad 18:04, 2007 rugpjūčio 10 (EEST)

Galbūt. Tačiau visa tai tėra subjektyvios nuomonės (įskaitant mano), kurių aš neaptarinėju. Taipogi, neskatinu trolinimo (taipogi ir konfliktų - čia dėl „nesikišk“). Ir tiesiog informacijai - lankausi čia visąlaik pakankamai dažnai, kad jausčiau bendrą situaciją :) --JonasS 11:15, 2007 rugpjūčio 20 (EEST)

Sveiki, ar galėtų kas nors paaiškinti, kaip čia viskas toj Vikipedijoj veikia? Užsiregistravau Vikipedijoje, padariau įrašų apie savo kaimą, o jie buvo be jokio paaiškinimo ištrinti. Kaip suprasti šitą reikalą? Kokia čia pas jus kultūra. Nei padėkojimo, kad papildžiau, nei paaiškinimų. Tiesiog po keleto minučių ištrintas įrašas...

Dėkoju už Atsakymą, Darius Mankevičius Darius Mankevičius (aptarimas) 23:37, 26 vasario 2021 (EET)

ID of File:Vaisgina Ajuga genevensis.jpg

Dear JonasS,

I just changed the ID of your image File:Vaisgina Ajuga genevensis.jpg on Commons to Ajuga reptans. The plant on your photograph cannot be Ajuga genevensis because the stems are just not sufficiently hairy and the bracts are hardly lobed at all. So, even though I cannot clearly recognize any runners I believe there was sufficient evidence to rename the plant. Please note that I just changed the category and the scientific name, because your Lithuanian description is not understandable for me. Best regards -- Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:36, 30 liepos 2011 (EEST)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 23:10, 13 sausio 2017 (EET)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in English)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF). About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 10:00, 23 vasario 2017 (EET)

Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2018

Hi JonasS,

First of all, sorry for writing in English, but I don't speak any Lithuanian (aš nekalbu lietuviškai)

I have opened a discussion about selection of Lithuanian representatives to Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2018, a meeting of Wikipedians from our region, Central and Eastern Europe, here: Vikipedija:Forumas#Wikimedia CEE Meeting 2018. We would need to know who are the Lithunian representatives tomorrow (15 August) by the end of the day.

Unfortunately, we did not get a lot of input from the community yet. Can you please confirm if you are interested in participation as a representative of Lithuanian community?

Thank you, on behalf of Wikimedia CEE Meeting team – NickK (aptarimas) 17:59, 14 rugpjūčio 2018 (EEST)

Ukrainian names

Lithuanian Wikipedia, as the main title of the article, uses old Soviet translations of cities and provinces of Ukraine. Correct modern translations in your status are an alternative name. For example: Charkovas mistake, you need Charkivas, Zaporožė is wrong - real name Zaporižia and others. Where to be a forum to communicate for correction. The main title of the article needs to be a real modern name.--Bohdan Bondar (aptarimas) 11:55, 27 rugpjūčio 2018 (EEST)

@Bohdan Bondar: Zaparižė, old, lithuanian name. Or Zaparagė. In old maps i can found everything intersting.--Makenzis 12:03, 27 rugpjūčio 2018 (EEST)

MakenzisUnder the USSR, geographic names were included in the cartography of the world after they were spoiled by the Russian language. Old maps are not an auto source. they copied the occupation nicknames of Moscow

You must understand that independence was received only in 1991. Until 1991, the translation arose under the onslaught of Moscow and the Russian language.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ems_Ukaz

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valuev_Circular https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russification_of_Ukraine

also should know that from the middle of the 19th century until 1917 - the Ukrainian language was officially prohibited in the Russian Empire. The government of the Russian Empire forbade us to call Ukrainians and came up with a nickname for us small Russian. Therefore, names from old maps are political names influenced by the fact that we were not a separate country from Russia.  This wikipedia, like the Spanish and Portuguese - the only three who in the European Union will very much ignore the current trends of European cartography. A common trend of cartography is the rejection of Russian names. Your Wikipedia is on the list of three wikis, which does not want to fully use the Ukrainian names  Your Wikipedia is the first place in the Wikipedia of the countries of the European Union in terms of the number of Russian names.-- Bohdan Bondar (aptarimas) 19:40, 27 rugpjūčio 2018 (EEST)

По словарю иностранных названий оба варианты - Zaporožė и Zaporižia, Charkovas и Charkivas может быть употреблены официально. Hugo.arg (aptarimas) 21:21, 27 rugpjūčio 2018 (EEST)

Wikipedia uses the names, which are in the sources, it does not invent correct or more correct names or facts.--Dirgela (aptarimas) 21:37, 27 rugpjūčio 2018 (EEST)

Dirgela :Makenzis :Hugo.argWith the wikipedia of Western European there are no problems. And with the country's wikipedia, which, together with Ukraine, has freed itself from the Russian Soviet occupation - the refusal to look is incomprehensible. I do not want to throw out Russian names in the trash. Just swap places - make the main title of the article. This is necessary to ensure that Google maps have changed the translation, because they choose the version from Wikipedia.--Bohdan Bondar (aptarimas) 22:26, 27 rugpjūčio 2018 (EEST)

Wikipedia is not a subdivision of Google thus we dont really care about Google maps. If you think Google maps get something wrong, please write them. Like Dirgela said Wikipedia is based on sources, and names in Lithuanian are taken from sources in Lithuanian. --Nomad (aptarimas) 02:44, 28 rugpjūčio 2018 (EEST)

@Bohdan Bondar: In LTU we know „Kijevo kotletas“ only. Kijevas in LTU Kijevas, not Kiiv/Kijivas, Kijowas, Kijovas or others. In Ukrainian football season i like use Charkivas. With Zaparižė/Zapariža/Zaparagė problems, because everyone call this City Zaporožė and recognize as Zaporožė.--Makenzis 10:13, 28 rugpjūčio 2018 (EEST)

By the way, i created few towns Čornomorskas, Horišni Plavniai, Petrovė, Renis, Sarata, Tatarbunarai, Zoria. What do you think, everything is right in this case? --Makenzis 10:15, 28 rugpjūčio 2018 (EEST)

Makenzis nicely But you need Zaporizza European countries (90 percent) use Ukrainian language.

Your Wikipedia should not copy Google maps because the creator of Google maps is a Russian who left the USSR in the 1980s with the USSR. Google maps only recently corrected the Russian Kiev at Kyiv. Before that, they resisted for a long time. Google maps ignore the situation with the occupied Crimea and removed Ukraine from the Crimea. Hero.wego.com Bing map Baidu map Yandex map (international version) Michelin map ---Crimea is ukrainian--Bohdan Bondar (aptarimas) 10:38, 22 lapkričio 2018 (EET)

Naudotojas Fivetrees ieško jūsų

Parašykite man, prašau, laišką į fivetrees@yahoo.com Noriu susisiekti su jumis. --Fivetrees (aptarimas) 14:07, 5 kovo 2019 (EET)

Your feedback is needed - Improving the Content Translation tool

Hello Friend,

Apologies as this message is not in your native language.

The WMF language team is reaching out to you based on your position as an admin in the Lithuanian Wikipedia. In particular, we want to learn about your experience, the issues you encounter with articles created with Content translation.

We appreciate the great work you are doing in Lithuanian Wikipedia to ensure standard and quality articles are not compromised. However, it is a big task to encounter content that is not standard daily, and a difficult decision to delete them because they fall below standard.

Our observations

We noticed that articles created with the Content Translation tool in your wiki are deleted more frequently than in other Wikipedias. We say this because, from our statistics, 6813 articles were added to Lithuanian Wikipedia in 2020; out of the above figure, only 67 articles were translated using the Content Translation tool, and 67% (45 articles) were deleted. Therefore, the deletion rate and the tool's low usage signals a problem or deficiencies peculiar to Lithuanian Wikipedia. The Content Translation tool can increase content creation in your Wikipedia and is an excellent way to efficiently introduce newcomers to adding content and expand on existing ones.

Our request

So, we want you to participate in a survey. The survey will give us insight into how we can improve the tool to get quality articles and reduce the number of deletion, hence making your work easier.

Please follow this link to the Survey:

Take the Survey
To know how the information collected from the survey will be used, please read the Privacy Statement.

If you are not comfortable with taking the survey, that is fine. You can still provide us with feedback in this thread or via email on the following questions:

• What makes the articles created with content translation fall below standard in your Wikipedia?
• What are the common mistakes that editors that use content translation make?
• How do you think we can improve the  Content Translation tool that will help you with your work or make your task easier and reduce deletion of articles in Lithuanian Wikipedia?

So please, feel free to give us feedback in any way that is most convenient for you.

Thank you so much, as we look forward to your response

UOzurumba (WMF) (talk) 14:00, 21 birželio 2021 (EEST) On behalf of the WMF language team.

Reminder: Your feedback is needed - Improving the Content Translation tool

Hello Friend!

The WMF Language team earlier reached out to you to participate in a survey to give us insight into improving the Content Translation tool to make your work as an admin easier. Towards improving the quality of content in your Wikipedia and avoiding the case of content deletion.

Again, we are reaching out to you as a reminder to Take the Survey as the survey will close on 9th July 2021 (23:59 UTC). The survey will only take you between 10 to 15 minutes. Please read the Privacy Statement to know how the information collected from the survey will be used.

If you already took the survey- thank you! You don't need to retake it.

Thank you, as we look forward to your response.

UOzurumba (WMF) 22:17, 6 liepos 2021 (EEST) On behalf of the WMF Language team.

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

20:17, 4 sausio 2022 (EET)

Your advanced permissions on ltwiki

Hello. A policy regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, interface administrator, etc.) was adopted by community consensus in 2013. According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing activity on wikis with no inactivity policy.

You meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no logged actions for 2 years) on this wiki. Since this wiki, to the best of our knowledge, does not have its own rights review process, the global one applies.

If you want to keep your advanced permissions, you should inform the community of the wiki about the fact that the stewards have sent you this information about your inactivity. A community notice about this process has been also posted on the local Village Pump of this wiki. If the community has a discussion about it and then wants you to keep your rights, please contact the stewards at the m:Stewards' noticeboard, and link to the discussion of the local community, where they express their wish to continue to maintain the rights.

If you wish to resign your rights, please request removal of your rights on Meta.

If there is no response at all after one month, stewards will proceed to remove your administrator and/or bureaucrat rights. In ambiguous cases, stewards will evaluate the responses and will refer a decision back to the local community for their comment and review. If you have any questions, please contact the stewards.

Yours faithfully. --Superpes15 (aptarimas) 20:26, 7 vasario 2024 (EET)